If you're more concerned about the possible source of the #DNCLeak -- completely unproven at this point and promoted by the same media that are in collusion with the DNC -- than about the fact that the Dem primaries were rigged (see recent remarks by Harry Reid), then you are the reason that so many of us will never support Clinton, no matter how much fearmongering you attempt.
No, Clinton would NOT have won without the DNC's thumb on the scale, stealing or tossing out the votes of thousands (perhaps millions) of citizens and feeding false stories to the media. In sports, when someone is proved to have cheated, their "win" is rescinded. Why do we have lower standards for "democracy"?
electionjusticeusa.org released a report that said: "In our research we examined the election results of the 2016 presidential primaries, and found irregularities in the overwhelming majority of the twenty-one states that we analyzed. The data indicates, in particular, that the totals reported on the Democratic side in the race between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders may not be correct. In state after state, independent examination by two separate analysts found suspect statistical patterns giving Clinton inflated percentages, that in all likelihood, are not fully based on actual votes, and showing Sanders with what appear to be artificially depressed totals."
Check out the details yourself. http://electionjusticeusa.org/index.php/re…
We have some of the most corrupt elections in the industrialized world, and you want us to fall in line? Not happening.
Let's leave aside for the time being the excellent question raised by a commenter on your previous piece on this topic, "What makes you think the data is accurate?"
That commenter pointed out that representatives of this district have a track record, during the last three years, of repeatedly being caught in lies in communications with the public, and that given what we've seen in the past, these behaviors seem likely to occur in cases where what is being reported is politically useful (e.g. enrollment figures given immediately preceding a board election).
You write, "That means that during the last two years, HOLDING ONTO students for the entire school year had a significant role in slowing the overall decrease of students." You seem to like that term "holding onto," which you use repeatedly throughout the piece.
But the numbers don't necessarily mean what you suggest. Overall enrollment change during any period reflects transfers in as well as transfers out, something that was previously pointed out to you in discussions of UHS enrollment. If enrollment at the beginning of the year was 1000 and at the end was 995, it doesn't necessarily mean the district "held onto 995 students for the entire school year." It may mean that the district lost 30 and gained 25 during the course of the school year.
As commenters have written many times, you have to be on the sites in this district to understand what the numbers mean. Gaming the numbers in various ways is a standard-issue administrative practice. You have not been on the sites, and you never make the effort to talk to those on the sites who might be able to help you understand what is ACTUALLY going on, as opposed to what the numbers the district produces suggest is going on.
(What happened with that audit report not too long ago, David? Did it confirm the % of classroom vs. admin spending the district had been self-reporting?)
Now it makes sense. As the students aged and the discipline problems became greater the parents took their kids and left. It's also the same time frame that the ADS had an online comments section where parents and teachers could post their stories without identifying themselves. (Out of fear of retribution.) This has gone on in TUSD since the mid 90s when the board was taken over by radicals.
At this point it is much like trying to drag the Titanic off the ocean floor. It's found peace right where it is at.
Peace on TUSD. Before they peace on you.
My favorite band and they are coming to play in Tucson! It doesn't get any better than that!
"Facts are stupid things."
Ronald Reagan (1911-2004)
Calling D'souza an historian is like calling Homer Simpson a gourmet restaurant critic. Just one tiny error of hundreds, THERE WERE NO REPUBLICANS EXISTING DURING ANDREW JACKSON's term of office.
Dick Morris was on the Clinton payroll for years. But she doesn't have problems with bad decisions does she?
Dinesh D'Souza is a right wing propagandist that subscribed to the desperate attempts at smearing Obama and made a documentary to push that :
1. He is born in Kenya
2. He is a muslim
I removed my kids from TUSD 9 years ago as soon as Tanque Verde started open enrollment. After enduring 3 years of school closure threats I had had enough. I love the small classes and wonderful teachers and the kids all know each other. They are getting a first rate personal education. Nothing would make me return to TUSD.
Dinesh D'Souza and Dick Morris. Quite the brain trust you got there.
"The fact that Bernie made as good a showing as he did, and was willing to take the high road when the revelations came out, means the Democratic Party has to take his influence seriously." TDB
Really? The Democratic Party, and pointedly the DNC, have proven they are the black hole of the political universe. They will suck up all energy and continue on as nothing has really happened. Working against a party candidate? No problem? Thinly veiled anti-semitic/anti-atheist plots to derail the candidate? No problem.
Watching Sanders kowtow to the party, a party he had never been a member of til this election, was disgusting. He should have walked out with his supporters. These people who trusted him and worked their butts off in his campaign have every right to be turned off to politics ... and to sit this one out or vote their consciences.
Thanks Jim. Interesting video. Really ought to help America see just who she is.
Sounds thrilling. Did he make a version for grown ups?
I'm with you on this one, MH. My first election-& the last time I voted third party-was the 1980 Presidential. Of course, even if all third-party votes had gone to Carter, that bad actor who wound up in the White House for eight years would still have done so. All the same, I learned all about wasting my vote then (never mind how much better Carter looks in hindsight). & Who else remembers the Nader fiasco?
The fact that Bernie made as good a showing as he did, and was willing to take the high road when the revelations came out, means the Democratic Party has to take his influence seriously. Meanwhile, any vote not for Hillary will just get p!$$ed away, and make it that much more likely we'll get a textbook fascist for president (hopefully, checks-&-balances would keep him from some of the more egregious parts of his agenda, but not without a lot of damage & wasted energy).
There's a bigger story not being told for whatever reasons: The online Arizona Daily Independent, with a FOIA request, obtained a bunch of county emails that show County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry, Deputy John Bernal, planner (Dr.) John Moffatt, PCDOT Director Priscilla Cornelio, former State Transportation Board Chair Steve Christy, and others working closely with non-government private groups and individuals -- Tucson-Metro Chamber of Commerce, Sun Corridor Inc., Imagine Greater Tucson and Southern Arizona Leadership Conference, lawyer Si Schorr, lobbyist Michael Racy, and more -- to shape county policy contrary to express Board of Supervisors' policies. Check out the July 25 story at https://arizonadailyindependent.com/?p=104….
Love the circular peak meter!
I wish that he will put out garbage cans as well. The trash left on the beautiful deserts is all over many counties. I am a raging Liberal, but I am not for illegal immigration. I still would rather have someone seeking a future then those that buy their way in to our country, like the Chinese and Green Valley Hospital.
The benefit to those that the polititions pander to exists, or better immigration policy would have been passed decades ago. Hence the first vote by the right to allow green cards for below minimum wage. Our jobs have been lost by those same politicians. Our tax dollars and jobs are overseas, hidden in our massive corporate pirate companies. Low wages are also an effect of massive manipulation of law, passed by those we vote for.
Greed is the topic here, and the dollars are floating up. Screaming about border crossers is foolish and shows a lack of understanding that our, "Representatives", do not work for America anymore. Corporations like Amazon and Walmart now allow pirated products to grace their shelves. I recently bought gloves the said, "Designed in America, Made in China. Disgusting!!! This is where our borders need the protection. How could we survive on artificially low wages without the laws passed that allow cheap Chinese products into our country, child credit tax breaks and welfare. Our very Representatives are not Patriots!
Finally, a fair review of this film.
It's very socialist. They're required to help you. Without ANY kind of socialism, you would be completely on your own.
I'm glad you've lived...and (hopefully) learned.
GOING TO SEE IT SUNDAY
Check out dick morris video of hillary---must see
Tucson Weekly |
7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 |
(520) 797-4384 |
Powered by Foundation