Two articles put UA’s Freedom School back in the news, directly and indirectly.
First story: At a time when Ducey’s proposed budget is squeezing bloodย from every funding turnip it can find, the governor managed to find a million dollars to give to the Koch-backed libertarian outpost at University of Arizona. It includes $100,000 to develop a “civics and constitutionalism curriculum for K-12 and postsecondary education institutions.”
Second story: An Associated Press story on the Star’s front page discusses how the Koch brothers give money to Virginia’s George Mason University to hire professors, then demand a say in who is hired and fired. Not covered in the story is a similar arrangement at UA’s “Freedom School.”
The Ducey budget.
Ducey and Republican legislative leaders have been scrambling to pull together a budget with enough money to fund a 9 percent salary increase for teachers. That means, among other things, cutting $35 million from hospitals, cutting $52 million from Medicaid prescription costs, taking $20 million from the state’s settlement with Volkswagen andย adding $16.7 million to property taxes in Tucson.
But with all the cuts, Ducey found $2ย million to give to the Koch-backed “Freedom Schools” at UA and ASU, a million dollars each. The current budget is the first one with a line item for the Koch-backed “Freedom Schools.” This proposed budget will be the second.
Call the $2 million what it is: a taxpayer funded gift to the universities’ libertarian centers in exchange for millions of dollars from the Koch donor network to help fund Ducey’s reelection efforts.ย In 2014,ย based on the promise that Ducey would be Arizona’s Great Right Hope,ย the Koch brothers and their affiliates spent millions onย his first gubernatorial campaign. The reported total ranged fromย $1.5 million to $5 million depending on how much dark money spent on the campaign came from the Koch network.
Since then, Ducey has proven himself to be the real deal. He’s cut taxes every year and pushed through an expansion of private school vouchers. In 2017, he told the millionaires and billionaires gathered at the Koch Donor Summit, “I needed the power of the network” to push the voucher expansion to cover all K-12 students through the legislature.ย Ducey has every reason to expect to receiveย a hefty chunk of the $400 million the Koch network plans to spend on the 2018 elections.
Of the million dollars going to UA’s “Freedom School”โtheย “Freedom School” isย actually two entities, theย Center for the Philosophy of Freedom and theย Department of Political Economy & Moral Scienceโ$100,000 is earmarkedย to develop a “civics and constitutionalism curriculum for K-12 and postsecondary education institutions.” That means taxpayers are funding the expansion of the course,ย Phil 101: Ethics, Economy, and Entrepreneurship, which is currentlyย being taught in four local school districts as well as a number of charter and private schools. Creation of the course was funded by a $3 millionย grant to the Freedom Center from the John Templeton Foundation. Using the grant, David Schmidtz,ย founding director of the Freedom Center, created the course out of whole cloth. He and associates wrote the curriculum, wrote and self-published the textbook and trained the high school teachers in summer seminars. Schmidtz is listed as the teacher of record for the high school courses.
If the budget being considered by the legislature passes, taxpayers will pick up the tab for maintaining and expanding the spread of libertarian-centered courses into public high schools around the state.
The involvement of private donors in “Freedom School” hiring.
The general rule at universities is, private donors are welcome to fund professorships, but the actual hiring is left to the universities. The Koch brothers like to be more involved. In 2008, the Koch Foundation insisted on significant control of hiring and curriculum at Florida State University as a condition of its financial support. The Associated Press article in the Starย discussesย a similar situation at the Mercatus Center located at George Mason University in Virginia. A Freedom of Information Act request revealed that the Koch Foundation chose two of the five members of the committees tasked with hiring and firing professors. That meant theyย only needed one vote from another committee member to decide who would be hired using their money, and the professors knew they could be fired by the Kochs if their instruction deviated from the brothers’ ideology.
The hiring situation at UA’s Freedom Center is somewhat less intrusive, but the donors still have the ability toย play a significant role in who gets hired with their money.ย A Freedom of Information Act request from the group Kochs Off Campus asked for an itemized list of Freedom Center funders. The documents reveal that three funders required the university to show them the credentials of the candidates to be hired.
The three funders areย The Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation,ย Randy P. Kendrick and Earl G. Kendrick, and theย Thomas W. Smith Foundation. The Kendricks are an Arizona couple who have given millions to the Koch donor network and have worked with the Kochs on a variety of projects. Theย Thomas W. Smith Foundation isย “dedicated to supporting free markets, [and] has started paying for scholarly centers on campuses,” according to a member of its board of trustees. It has partnered with the Koch Foundation in creating centers at a number of universities including UA. You can learn more about these and other Freedom Center funders in an earlier post.
The Koch Foundation and the Kendricks used identical language in their agreements with the UA about the way the university uses their money to hire professors. Both say, “The University agreed to recruit and hire a tenured professor to work in the Freedom Centerย and agreed to show the credentials of the candidate for hire” to the funders. In the agreement with theย Thomas W. Smith Foundation, theย language is more explicit about getting prior approval from the foundation before hiring a professor.
“The University agreed to hire a new full-time tenured or tenure-eligible professor to work inย the Freedom Center and agreed to show TWSF the credentials of the candidate for hire priorย to extending an offer.”
The donor agreements with the university make it difficult for UA’s “Freedom Schools” to claimย their professors and curriculumย are academically independent from their donors.
George Mason University has denied for years that the Kochs had any control over the choice of professors. When the Koch’s arrangement was made public,ย GMU President Angel Cabrera apologized, writing that the agreementsย โfall short of the standards of academic independence I expect any gift to meet.โ UA’s president should make a similar apology and take appropriate measures to make sure all departments at the university are free of interference from donors.
This article appears in Apr 26 โ May 2, 2018.



“The general rule at universities is, private donors are welcome to fund professorships, but the actual hiring is left to the universities.”
But the endowment typically requires that the person hired to fill the endowed professorship have a particular academic interest that the donor wants to see advanced: breast cancer research, civil rights for LBGT people, etc. The Koch endowments seek to attract people who are interested in individual freedom as a philosophy of ethics and government, and it’s par for the course that the money be used to hire people like that. There’s nothing unusual about this process. The people objecting to it are objecting because they disagree with the Koch’s ideology, and the ideas that the Koch’s want to advance.
And while we’re on that subject, what is wrong with a little ideological diversity in the social sciences academy? There are more self-described Marxists in the American social sciences academy than self-described conservatives. Don’t we owe it to the students to provide a little balance? Diversity, we are told, is our greatest strength. What’s wrong with the Kochs bringing a bit of diversity to a handful of departments in a handful of schools?
Come on Nar we all know the diversity crowd hates diversity.