Today’s NY Times has a story, Arizona Hopes New Charter Schools Can Lift Poor Phoenix Area. I haven’t read about this in Arizona media or seen some kind of press release. I don’t expect to learn what’s going on in Arizona education in the Times.
The story begins by saying Arizona’s charter school movement has been aimed at middle class families and is now looking to serve low income students “starting, in effect, an experiment in urban education.”
Bad beginning.
Charters have been experimenting in urban education for years, with questionable results. True, the conservative “education reform” folks love to trumpet the successes of BASIS charters, ignoring the fact that most of their success can be attributed to their selective student body. (After laying the BASIS groundwork, they’ll add in stories about a few other charters whose students would do well pretty much anywhere they went to school to add heft to the “charters are better than ‘government schools’” mythology.) The charter PR machine tends to ignore the urban and suburban schools that trade mainly in low income students, because those places generally end up with low scores on high stakes tests, just like the “failing government schools” they love to criticize. In fact, according to a recent national study, Arizona’s charter school students score significantly lower than similar students in school district schools, a fact pointed out later in the NY Times article.
The plan is “to open 25 high-performing schools over five years within the 220 square miles of the Phoenix Union High School District.” It’s the brain child of the Arizona Charter School Association, a private charter school promotion organization heavily funded by pro-privatization money. “We believe we know what works,” says ACSA president Eileen Sigmund, ignoring the fact that, so far, Arizona charter schools could take a few pointers from district schools on how to get their test scores up.
But I guess they figure with the millions they’ll be getting from the Walton Foundation, the very conservative family that owns Walmart and is a huge contributor to the whole school privatization movement, they’ll be able to do better than they’ve done in the past.
Here’s a fun part of the story. Lisa Graham Keegan commented that Arizona charter schools haven’t done a good job meeting the needs of their communities. “We didn’t force the issue of quality in the early days,” she said. Keegan must be using the royal “We,” because she was the primary force behind the original 1994 charter bill in the state senate, then she went on to be Superintendent of Education where she got the charter program rolling. Her plan: leave the charters to the “invisible hand of the marketplace,” which would weed out the bad charters and leave the successful schools to ply their trade. After a few decades of mediocre results, I guess Keegan has decided the invisible hand could use a little help.
The teams running the schools are going to be heavy with Teach for America alumni. TFA is the program that sends college grads into mainly low income schools — they usually stay two or three years, then leave education to go on with the rest of their lives — with nothing to guide them but a little bit of training over the summer. TFA has moved increasingly into the charter school sector, where the teachers are mostly young and their average longevity in the classroom is three to five years, so the raw TFA recruits fit right in.
The teaching methodology they plan to push in the 25 schools stresses order and routine. Teachers follow a set program, and students aren’t given a lot of room to diverge from the packaged curriculum. It’s a good way to make minimally trained, minimally experienced teachers look competent, and a good way to burn them out in a hurry. Most teachers don’t go into the profession to paint by the numbers.
Eileen Sigmund made a promise in the story I’m betting she’ll live to regret. She expects the new schools which will serve students from low income families to get A’s on their state report cards in their first three years, or “there are several exit points.” It’s going to be a wild ride.
This article appears in Jan 16-22, 2014.

Sad closing statements from Sigmund. David, do we know of any charters that are legitimately succeeding at educating the whole child in Tucson?
“David, do we know of any charters that are legitimately succeeding at educating the whole child in Tucson?”
With all respect, the issue with charters is not whether or not they educate the whole child, but whether they meet their obligation as public schools to at least try and educate all children. The answer to that is a resounding “No.” You don’t need the fingers of one hand to count the percentage of tough to educate students in any of the prominent charter schools.
Howie Fischer sure as hell isn’t going to report on it, and since the Star doesn’t have a Statehouse reporter of its own …
Eileen Sigmund’s bio short version: She’s not an educator.
Long version: She’s a venture capitalist with taxpayer money
“Since joining the Association in June 2007, Eileen led the Association in notable efforts including: developing a model that measures “value-added” growth in achievement, which is used for A-F rankings of all Arizona schools; creating trainings that enable teachers and school leaders to collaboratively use data; launching joint purchasing programs; filing lawsuits for equitable funding for all K-12 students; increasing positive public perceptions of charters; and, building a comprehensive program to support prospective charter school operators. In 2013, Eileen launched the separate nonprofits of New Schools For Phoenix which recruits and trains leaders to open high quality schools for low-income Phoenix students and the Center For Student Achievement which is focused on high-quality school improvement initiatives, with a particular emphasis on professional development and the publication of rigorous and transparent research and evaluation. Eileen has a strong advocacy background, having served as a journalist, litigator, and lobbyist. Eileen is an Education Fellow in the two-year Fall 2013 cohort of Pahara-Aspen Education Fellows; a member of the Board of Directors of the Arizona Chamber Commerce & Industry, and on the Advisory Council of the Charter Schools Development Corporation.”
https://azcharters.org/staff-bios
Check it out. Payroll for this group must be huge. Your tax dollars funding their bad ideas.
This has NOTHING to do with lifting the poor. It has EVERYTHING to do with filling the pockets of charter school companies. It has been proven over and over these schools make NO difference and it has been proven that owner companies make great profits
ALERT: 100% education voucher for ALL children!
While we fiddle…are children’s education being ignored?
Voucher sent to every child in Arizona via their parent to choose home,
private, or public education. (1) Will give parents their prior-right to
ed/train their child. (2) Will give every child education opportunities.
(3) Will reduce cost for education/training. (4) Will help reduce private
and public debt.
Thanks and Good Luck
Mr Safier wrote:
“Eileen Sigmund made a promise in the story I’m betting she’ll live to regret.”
Go check the AZ ADE map of schools and look in the poorer areas of Phoenix for ‘A’ rated schools. 9 out of 10 of those schools will be charter schools. Here is more info on the group creating those schools so you can lob more ad hominem attacks on those trying to give poor students a way out of their failing schools. http://newschoolsforphoenix.org/