The Tucson Unified School District voted 3-2 Monday to select Heliodoro Torres Sanchez as the sole finalist for the position of superintendent. Michael Hicks and Mark Stegeman opposed having only one finalist to chose from.
The district is hosting a forum from 7 to 9 p.m. tonight at Catalina Magnet High School with Sanchez so community members can ask him questions.
Here’s our immediate take (this is, of course, not knowing who the other candidates were since those names were not been released by the district): We’re just not sure about Sanchez.
He has no significant CEO/superintendent experience. His resume doesn’t reflect the qualifications outlines on the job description. This is a board, a district and a population that, frankly, eats superintendents alive for breakfast. It puts Gov. Brewer and her scorpion chow to shame.
Sanchez looks like a nice guy and seems smart. We talked to some folks in Odessa who told us the father of two young children is a devout Christian who likes to work on classic cars. His wife was just made principal of an district school in the Ector County Independent School District.
But before he was named interim superintendent of EISD upon the prior superintendent’s retirement, Sanchez worked as chief of staff, and his resume reflects someone who has jumped from job to job.
Those who’ve been covering school districts for some time wonder if this is a short stop resume padding for Sanchez—kind of like Elizabeth Celina-Fagin, who was only here for less than two years, went on to a district outside of Denver, Colo. and is in the midst of not-so-happy populace that doesn’t like most of their schools being turned into charters.
Here’s a little more about what we know about Sanchez (and don’t forget to read next week’s issue for additional information): The EISD in Odessa did something we’ve never been able to do. They passed a $125 million bond. They also recently settled a desegregation complaint. The racial make-up is similar to TUSD, in that the Texas district has 65 percent Latino student population, though its student population is around 30,000. TUSD has gone from 70,000 to 50,000 in about five years, so who knows? We could be getting close to 30,000 pretty soon.
The bond money the Odessa district approved is going to build middle schools. Right now, they have a model where high schools include grades 10-12 and middle schools are grades 7-9. But there are have been issues with test scores. The public may have also not been happy that the district spent $100,000 on a positive “news” advertising campaign.
That may be why a majority of the district’s board was replaced this year. Citizens elected new faces after a campaign in which the issues included poor test scores and how the district dealt with a new curriculum many felt wasn’t presented to the schools correctly, and the training offered to the teachers. There were also accusations of bullying associated with the curriculum—bullying by administrators toward teachers.
Some board members were supposedly surprised that Sanchez was looking for work elsewhere. The 38-year-old interim administrator was working on strategic planning with the public and board—signs folks took that he was preparing himself to apply for the job. As a source suggested, maybe Sanchez just wasn’t sure he could get the votes he needed to be hired with a new majority on the board.
At one school in Odessa where test scores were particularly bad, all the ninth graders were taken out and bused across the district to a different school. That, we were told, made a lot of people mad. Ninth grade was returned to that school, and then the middle school announcement was made to go with the bond.
So, what are you going to ask Sanchez at tonight’s forum? Here are a few suggestions:
1. Do you feel you are leaving your last school district better than you found it?
2. Are you familiar with the Mexican-American studies issue in Tucson and what are your thoughts?
3. How do you plan to work with a board that is often split 3-2 in its votes and doesn’t have a lot of trust behind that sacred dais?
4. Why have you gone job to job, and how can we guarantee that you are going to stay here more than two years? How about sticking around for at least 10, even when we give you a lot of shit?
5. What are your thoughts on turning around TUSD’s reputation? More money to marketing and advertising as was done in Odessa?
6. Are you a fighter, brother, because we could really use a fighter?
7. What are thoughts on charter schools and would you like to see the district expand into this area even more?
8. This is a fractured community that has been through so much — from classes closed, curriculum and books banned, to school closures and the death of the neighborhood. Any suggestions on how to make things better?
9. What did you learn about the desegregation complain in Odessa that you think will help you understand TUSD and what we’ve been dealing with the past 40 years?
10. Why should we feel that despite your lack of experience that you should be hired?
Read the constituent letter than went out his morning from Stegeman. Sanchez entirely his pick either, although he sent a follow-up email letting folks know he still believes the board can do what they need to do — because, yeah, they’ve always shown that to be the case, right?
It is important to add that I believe that all members of the Board are acting sincerely and in good faith according to what they perceive to be the best interests of TUSD and its students.
And of course I hope it is completely clear that I will work with and support whomever the Board ultimately selects as the superintendent.
Here’s Stegeman’s entire letter:
Dear supporters and correspondents,
It is a cliche but true that a school board’s most important decision — by far — is its choice of superintendent. This decision requires great care, time, and thoroughness.
Therefore, I am concerned that, less than a week after getting its first look at the applicants and with input only from the search firm, the TUSD Board on Monday announced a single finalist. The vote was 3-2 (Hicks and I dissenting).
To choose the chief executive officer of an organization having almost 7,000 employees, the Board (in my opinion) did only a fraction of the work that it should have done, reviewing and analyzing in detail the candidates’ records and references. It has had only a brief opportunity to meet candidates. It chose the single finalist without any input from the superintendent’s cabinet or internal and external stakeholder groups. Unlike in the past, no local committee of volunteers had reviewed applications. There had been no public forums, public postings of the candidates records, or opportunities for public input.
The final decision is only the Board’s and properly so. But additional time with the candidates and the chance to receive others’ useful insights would have been invaluable to the Board as it worked to reduce the field to one.
The Board majority has emphasized that choosing the finalist is not the final decision, that it will study the input received after Dr. H.T. Sanchez’s visit today. But it is hard for people to evaluate a candidate next to an unknown alternative.
How would the university and community react if the Board of Regents, after a brief hidden process, unexpectedly presented a single candidate for President of the University of Arizona? Even the TUSD Board’s internal schedule had been arranged to accommodate visits by up to four finalists.
Dr. Sanchez, the lone finalist, has a record somewhat similar to what Dr. Fagen had when TUSD hired her in 2008. He has changed jobs frequently and has only about 3 months of superintendent experience, at his smaller Ecktor County (Texas) school district. After Ecktor’s superintendent announced his retirement last spring, the Ecktor Board appointed Dr. Sanchez, on a 4-3 vote, to his current position as interim superintendent.
None of this implies, of course, that Dr. Sanchez would not be an excellent superintendent for TUSD. It does show that he has a thin record, relative to the magnitude of the TUSD superintendency.
Dr. Sanchez will appear in a community forum from 7-9 p.m. tonight at Catalina Magnet High School. The district has said that attendees will be able to submit questions to Dr. Sanchez and that he will have time to respond. The forum will be audio-streamed through TUSD’s usual channel (“Audio of Meetings”) at www.tusd1.org/governingboard.
I will write soon concerning the district budget and, separately, with a post-mortem on the school closure process.
Thank you for your interest in TUSD.
– Mark
This article appears in Jun 6-12, 2013.


Stegeman and Hicks didn’t vote against Sanchez being a finalist, it was against him being the ONLY finalist. I haven’t found anyone who likes the idea of only one finalist a good one.
O.K. I understand that sometimes we need to get things out quickly, but, please, a little proof reading. The rest of the typos were obvious in their meaning, but I want to be clear that I understand this one, Mari:
6. Are a fighter, brother, because we could really use a fighter?
??
Is the pronoun “you” missing?
Yes, my Isadoro, it was a fast one … thank you both. Back at the keyboard.
Mari, missing pronouns notwithstanding, there is one more question that must be asked, “With a wife that was just appointed as a principal in Texas and two small children to uproot, and knowing the microscope that TUSD operates under on a daily basis, why do you want this job?”
No doubt Marc, no doubt … thanks for adding another question.
I don’t think it really matters who the next superintendant is as TUSD has suffered so much trauma this past year that the picture isn’t going to be pretty the next five years. Pedicone trashed the Tucson community, blabbering about how the bond issue didn’t pass. Well, parents of TUSD students overwhelming voted yes, though because TUSD admin wanted something like 50% of the pie it didn’t pass.
Oh, the FBI is investigating TUSD Ops department for selling “surplus” equipment like electronic white boards in broad daylight and pocketing the money. Something like $500,000 in equipment was given away. Oh, and TUSD was going to spend $500,000 on a new logo and advertising.
TUSD is too big. It needs to be split into two districts, plain and simple. Eastside got gutted as TUSD’s bean crunchers think we’re going to bolt to charter schools.
I’m glad the new guy is young, perhaps less like Pedicone who looked down on TUSD’s parents, students and teachers, though as there is only one candidate, this isn’t a choice for the board and on the surface it looks like a potential corruption issue as the TUSD school board paid a *ton* of money to a search firm, and all it got them was one candidate.
I see the new sup. as a peacemaker, (I guess I’m naively judging this on his being a devout Christian), who can figure out how to deal with the MAS issue. TUSD’s has a history of special school programs for minorities which engender a lot of anger. I saw it as a student with MeCHA, and MAS seems to be the same. I don’t think these programs “work”, (the studies are biased), and they make the TUSD classroom a hostile place for those who don’t see the world through racism-tinged glasses and hatred.
Sadly, the new path to success in Tucson runs mostly through Catalina Foothills, (or maybe you’re smart enough to get into UHS), then you go to the U of A or another college doing a science/math related field. Latino and non-Latino parents know that putting your kid in a school with MAS and TUSD lunacy means likely not finishing school, or having a warped view of the world, and then dropping out of college, if you make it that far.
Schooling is way too early to politicize kids, quite possibly with warped ideas of how the world works. Kids should be joining Science Club, Chess Club, Math Club . . . and other clubs, not MAS. Mexican American Studies is just one major out of probably hundreds at the U of A. The U of A is *wonderful* opportunity in Tucson’s backyard with phenomenal programs in astronomy, biological sciences, mathematics, and on and on. Just flip through the schedule of classes. TUSD shouldn’t assume that Latino students just care about a small subset of Latino activists that teach critical race theory, there is so much more to the world!
Adelita and the rest of the TUSD school board should forget about MAS and focus on more helpful, but politically exciting topics like diabetes education, science and math prep for Latinos . . .
Ed, it’s part of the deseg plan, so who ever get’s this job is still gonna have to deal with things like Chicano literature, etc. We may as well find out what he thinks, but hell math and science are still part of the curriculum … you didn’t think Tom Horne would let us get rid of that, did you?
Ed, ya shoulda been there.
I was disappointed by the small turnout for HT Sanchez’s forum. The audience was comprised mostly of TUSD teachers – but it was on short notice. Good to see the governing board was there, as was Sylvia Campoy who represents the Montoya plaintiff in the deseg case. There’s a few other people I can think of that should have been there.
And of course, Sanchez presented himself well.
Applause was understandably polite – we’ve all gotten sick on this ride before.
Mari, you’ve probably gotten nauseous a few time over the years of covering this – what did you think of him?
I have concerns, but I’m proud to say I’m still hopeful.
It looks like the fix is in. How could they have only one finalist? This kind of thing will be happening all over the country in Schumer’s amnesty bill goes through.
When Amphi chose Vicki Ballantine as their supe, the board created a citizens committee to review and score applications. The ten finalists were scored down to three finalists and then those finalists attended community forums and answered questions. Those meetings were well attended, considering how small Amphi is compared to TUSD.
Dr. Sanchez may be a fine man, but sending just one candidate to the community was the wrong thing to do. It eliminated the community input and potential support necessary for a candidate to be successful. I will always wonder, why the board didn’t allow other applicants to be vetted by the stakeholders.
Adelita Grijalva wanted this guy and her and her sycophants are the board majority so that’s that. Thank goodness my kids aren’t in TUSD.
My question is simple: Will he turn off the AC at the schools that have been shuttered? I live across the street from Schumaker Elementary and the AC has been going full tilt for the week now that it’s been boarded up.
Thanks for the good reporting combined with reasonable opinions.
Jamie: That sounds bad. I have passed your comment on to the superintendent.
Jamie, one of the worst decisions ever made in TUSD was to centralize the control of heating and cooling. In other words it can’t be controlled by the individual schools. It has resulted in schools with rooms that are freezing cold right next to rooms that will blister your skin with heat. In order to shut down the AC at a school it must be done from a central location and someone must order that to happen. Hopefully that someone will realize that in order to begin saving money those school systems must be shut down. Of course if it was controlled in the individuals schools the custodian could have done it when he left on the last Friday, assuming of course he was one of those custodians who was willing to help because he knew what his fate was in the future of TUSD.
Considering the “fair and equitable” hiring practices TUSD adheres to – certainly no principal is able to select the best candidate, in their opinion, to fill ANY position at their school – it is amazing to me that the board is able to simply select the single candidate that they feel is the best for the top job in our district. Applicants for many positions in TUSD far lower than superintendent have to, in addition to making it through the paper screening, go through several interviews, submit writing prompts, and be scored on their responses by a panel of peers and administrators. A reasonable addition to the current process would be to have the cabinet interview Dr. Sanchez, as well as the other top prospects, as well as gathering input from the rank and file in our district. He, or she, will, after all, be our boss.