It’s a scenario most of us are familiar with: you’re working at a restaurant or two or three, trying to make enough money to get through college or life in general, and flu season hits. One of your coworkers is out of town, the other is also sick and another just won’t answer their phone. Even if they did answer, it’s not like you can afford to lose out on tip money for the day. So, you go in, try your best not to cough on someone’s quesadilla and hope the six or so hours of sleep you get after is enough for your body to repair itself. Not only is this a germ nightmare when food is involved, it’s also unfortunately common when you work for an employer that doesn’t offer paid sick leave.
Well, during today’s study session for Tucson’s City Council, which begins at 1 p.m., officials will be looking into a proposal to change it so all employers will be required to offer paid sick leave. According to supporting materials for the day’s session, four states and 20 cities already have put measures into place to ensure earned sick and safe time is offered.
“The purpose of these laws is to assist all workers in addressing their own health and safety needs and the health and safety needs of their families by requiring employers to provide a minimum amount of earned sick time, including time for the care of family members. Under Arizona Revised Statutes Section 23-364(I), the City of Tucson has authority to prescribe employee benefits related to earned sick time within the boundaries of Tucson.”
However, one group that represents a subset of employers that often do not offer these benefits is none too happy with the idea. The Arizona Restaurant Association issued a letter to Mayor Jonathan Rothschild on Dec. 7 to voice their concerns with the proposed measure, though it is still in its very early stages.
“This mandate is extremely harmful to restaurant owners, who have razor thin profit margins of only 2-4 percent…The restaurant and hospitality industry is inviting for many people who are looking for flexibility or an enjoyable work environment. We are the industry of opportunity…Mandating an employer’s ability to offer benefits is not only cost ineffective, but also discouraging for new or expanding restaurateurs to locate to Tucson.”
The letter goes on to state that, according to Arizona Revised Statutes 23-204, regulating employee benefits, like paid sick leave, is not in the hands of state municipalities.
In last week’s cover story, the city’s food arch—including its restaurants—was looked at as a whole. In doing so, it was revealed that nearly 40,000 people in Tucson are employed in food and beverage service or retail jobs. With so many individuals in the city working in the field, it seems the question of mandated benefits would at least be one worth looking into. However, by sending a letter before the study session even commenced, it seems the Arizona Restaurant Association, which is based out of Scottsdale, wanted to send a clear message about the proposal.
This article appears in Dec 3-9, 2015.
What the? Why would anyone want to eat at a restaurant whose owner would trade their patrons (and employees) health and safety for greater profit? Why would the Arizona Restaurant Association put itself in a position to be at odds with the interest of public health or worker protections? There surely must be some cost savings on food negotiated from fuel surcharge reductions. A nickel more for a burrito, if necessary, won’t be a deal breaker to protect both public and worker health.
After owning a business that provided sick leave, I can attest to the regular misuse of this benefit. Employees routinely used sick leave for hangovers, or just wanted an extra day off work. Without requiring a physican’s note, sick leave is the most abused privlage for employers.
Before I retired I worked at a place that we got sick days and paid holiday pay. When we first started we only got like 3 sick days a year and no vacation until after being there a year. After 3 years we got 2 or 3 more sick days and another week vacation.
work in a deli like Walmart they do not care if you have a note from doctor or not they write you up so you can still loose your job if they would at least make it so you can not be written up and loose your job would be nice
In 40 years I have missed three days of work. Guess I have been blessed. Never really thought about it. Then I read that the San Bernadino terrorist killer, took off time because his wife was pregnant. The office through a baby shower for he and his wife, who came back and slaughtered all of them.
What a sick world we live in.
Sick leave should be provided by every employer,I mean their already getting away with paying their employees the bare minimum while they laugh all the way to the bank. If an employee gets the flu and is out of work for a week then choices like should I pay rent or buy food arise. No one should be put in that position to decide what’s more important, food or shelter. It’s not anyone’s fault for falling ill. Employers use you take advantage of you and with most if you fall ill and cannot come to work will replace you. And make up whatever reason that suits them is to why you were terminated.B.S.
Open your own business and see if you change your thinking.
They only pay their employees about 2 bucks an hour. Like having to pay a server $16 for a missed shift is going to break the bank.
I would support it if they maintain a ready pool of replacementvservers from the massive illegal population in AZ. The City has budget excess money to burn, so pay the replacemnts until they actually sub for a sick worker. You want in business? Get in business.
Another silly nanny law proposal. Good employees will not be let go, they are needed. Just another attempt at fascism.