It’s safe to say that appointed U.S. Sen. Martha McSally has some work to do to win over the same female voters that President Donald Trump is driving into Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden’s camp.
A few weeks before McSally lost her 2018 Senate bid to Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, an NBC/Marist polls showed women favored Sinema by a 13 percentage point margin. That gap isn’t looking any better this year, as McSally—who was appointed the Senate by Gov. Doug Ducey to complete the late John McCain’s term after her 2018 loss—faces Democrat Mark Kelly. An early June New York Times/Sienna College poll showed women favored Kelly by a staggering 22 percentage points.
Salon today surfaced a 2007 paper that McSally wrote during her time pursuing a graduate degree in which she suggested that women in the military get pregnant—or, as she put, embrace the “foolishness of a lifetime commitment (motherhood)”—as a way to shirk their military responsibilities.
Arizona Republican senator and former Air Force combat pilot Martha McSally once published an academic paper in which she said military servicewomen should be counseled against the “foolishness of entering into a lifetime commitment (motherhood)” to avoid deployment, and called for the Pentagon to repeal the policy that allows women to use pregnancy as an excuse to “skirt” their commitment.
The article, titled “Women in Combat: Is the Current Policy Obsolete?” appeared in a 2007 edition of the Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy. At the time, McSally, the first female combat pilot in U.S. history — and the first-ever losing Senate candidate to immediately receive a Senate seat — was pursuing a second graduate degree at Air War College.
She later expanded on the article in a lecture at the Duke University School of Law, which hosts a full video on its website.
The Salon article further notes:
In the article, the former squadron commander calls for a cultural shift to teach servicewomen that it is “not appropriate” to have a child just because they want to.
“The military must foster a culture in which military women understand that it is not appropriate to get pregnant whenever they desire,” she writes. “Instead, women need to realize their duties take precedence. They must take measures to prevent unplanned pregnancies and plan for pregnancies to occur only when they are in non-deployable situations.” She does not elaborate on what those measures might include, and later rules out abortion as an acceptable option.
McSally goes on to explain that the primary “issue” with her proposal is that senior officials would have trouble saying with certainty exactly what a woman’s “intent” was behind her pregnancy.
This article appears in Jul 2-8, 2020.

Mark Kelly takes PPP money after defrauding Pima County tax payers and moving away after the County funded his operation.
What kind of Sen would he make?
Another John McCain with no hair.
I’ll take someone who protects the country over anyone. If we can allow destructive protestors an opinion, we can allow McSally an opinion.
She’s been toast for a long time. Now she’s beyond saving. Pretty sure the Republican Party is not going to spend a nickel more on her race.
Martha is sticking with Trump to shirk her responsibilities to Arizona.
Trump or Communist China? We hear you leftists
China sell out. ignorant babble. Mark kelly is an establishment corporate democrat like clinton and biden. I am a lefty and like AOC and bernie sanders we oppose sending jobs to china. The silicone valley tech billionaires and amazons jeff bezos are not in the left wing of the democrat party. As sun tzu said if you know your enemy and your self and you need not fear the outcome of a hundred battles, if you know neither you will always lose! Know your enemy. I know mine!
Im sure businesses downtown that were destroyed during the uncontrolled protests will be voting for McSally since they got no help from the democratic mayor and city council.
Kellys tourist balloons to space, takes a million dollars from Pima County taxpayers, blows up Raytheon’s windows and now is being sued by them.
https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2018/0…
I’m fascinated by the Colonel McSally I just viewed speaking out strongly without fear or favor. Can anyone tell me whatever became of that warrior? I only met a Colonel (Retired) Martha McSally when she decided she’d like to become a Member Congress here in Arizona and became a reciter and repeater of a set of safe statements beyond which she would not and still will not move. No bravado any more, just relatively harmless, sort of mindless ‘positions’ that take no courage, no conviction. Gosh, what I’ve just written almost seems to describe the man who appointed a losing senatorial candidate to the seat that might better have gone to a McCain, perhaps Cindy or Megan.
Fake sen. mc squeely seems to either hate being, or just hates women.
On the issue of skirting deployments or badly planned pregnancies, Martha McSally might have more support than her critics realize. How many American workers, military & civilian, men & women, have had to take on extra work because of the “light duties” or extended vacations of women who use poorly planned pregnancies to dump their responsibilities on co-workers? It’s not just avoiding deployments in the military. I know hard-working women & men who resent all work-shirkers among their colleagues. A pregnancy should be considered a perfect example of “personal responsibility”.
#micass55 Lesbophobic much?