In Sickness and In Health

Will U.S. Rep. Martha McSally remain wedded to the GOP agenda or will she show an independent streak?

Southern Arizona Congresswoman Martha McSally (R-AZ02) doesn’t typically go out on a limb when it comes to controversial issues. She has sidestepped questions about whether she’d vote for President Donald Trump, how the government should deal with undocumented people now in the country, whether she supports a new tax on imported goods and a host of other topics.

But last week, McSally uncharacteristically went all in on the Trumpcare proposal to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Even as the legislation was coughing up blood toward the end of the week as public approval was dropping to 17 percent in polling, McSally was a loyal soldier for House Speaker Paul Ryan. On Thursday, March 23, McSally’s office sent out a press release celebrating her work on an amendment to add $15 billion for the states to provide maternity care, substance abuse treatment and mental health care.

“We aren’t landing a helicopter, we are landing a 747, and we need a lot of runway to ensure a smooth transition to a system that lowers costs, expands choice, and increases quality of care,” McSally said in her prepared statement.

It was more like trying to land a flaming dumpster. The next day, Ryan pulled the bill after it was clear he didn’t have the votes to pass it out of the House of Representatives. As more concessions were made to Freedom Caucus hardliners, more moderate Republicans abandoned a bill that would result in 24 million Americans going without health insurance if it were enacted.

Much of what McSally was celebrating in her amendments wouldn’t have been necessary if she hadn’t been supporting underlying legislation that gutted requirements that insurance companies cover maternity care, substance abuse treatment and mental health care in the first place.

Whether McSally’s full-throated defense of the healthcare proposal will come back to haunt remains to be seen. (And a lot will depend on whether Democrats can find a legit challenger to McSally, a rising GOP star and peerless money-raiser.) But her reputation as an independent voice standing up for Southern Arizona is increasingly threatened by her voting record this year.

Journalists at at fivethirtyeight.com are keeping a running tally of how often members of Congress vote for Trump’s agenda. As Monday, March 27, McSally has a perfect 100 percent record of voting for Trump’s agenda in Congress. Given that the Democrat she unseated, Ron Barber, was dismissed as a “Pelosi lapdog” for voting with Democrats 75 percent of time, McSally doesn’t yet appear to be following through on the promise to be an independent voice standing up against her own party when necessary.

The next big test for McSally—and the rest of the GOP—is the upcoming tax reform rodeo that Republicans are tackling because healthcare couldn’t be squared away in four weeks of backroom meetings and middle-of-the-night votes.

As with the ObamaCare repeal, the ultimate goal of the tax reform is granting a massive tax cut for struggling millionaires and billionaires who have done enough to subsidize the poor in this nation. But the healthcare fail means that Republicans have about a trillion dollars less to play when they try to cook the books to make it look as though the tax cuts don’t explode the deficit.

One of the key elements of Ryan’s reform is a “border-adjustment tax” that would put a 20 percent tax on imports. It’s supposed to jumpstart American manufacturing, but it would be disastrous for Arizona at a time when trade relations—and dollars—are rebounding following the SB 1070 disruption.

Last week, Sen. John McCain came out against the border-adjustment tax, telling Politico it “would destroy America’s economy. … First thing will happen is that there’ll be retaliation. You think the Mexicans are going to sit still for it?”

McCain’s fellow Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake spoke out against the border-adjustment tax on the Senate floor, saying it “could make everyday consumer products more expensive at the very places that middle-class families shop the most.”

McSally has yet to stake out a position on the border adjustment tax, which has drawn big opposition from retailers such as Walmart and Target. A McSally spokesman told the Weekly in January that McSally “understands well the economic opportunity that commerce with Mexico brings to Arizona. When Congress tackles tax reform later this year, she will thoroughly analyze all proposals for their impact on southern Arizona residents.” Her office hasn’t responded to more recent efforts to suss out her position.

Wherever McSally eventually ends up on the border adjustment tax, the overall tax reform package will test another one of her core principles: Lowering the deficit. Is McSally going to support a giant tax cut for the wealthy that will be financed by future generations? We should know the answer soon enough.

Zona Politics with Jim Nintzel airs at 5 p.m. Sundays on community radio KXCI, 91.3 FM and at 1 p.m. Saturdays and 11 a.m. Sundays on KEVT, 1210 AM. Nintzel also talks politics on The John C. Scott show at 4 p.m. Thursday afternoons.

Getting hassled by The Man Mild-mannered reporter

11 replies on “The Skinny”

  1. They say you should judge people not by what they say but by what they do. If that’s true, based on the contents of the American Healthcare Act the people in power wanted to see the poor — both young and old — just die.

    Of course, no one will come out and say that, but there is this elitist attitude in Washington that people without means are not real people if they were, they could just go out and get jobs or stop buying “luxury” items such as cellphones and spend their money taking care of themselves.

    Those in congress and the senate talk about eliminating entitlements, even when they are the most entitled class out there. People in the military have to spend at least 20 years to retire with benefits. These guys just need to spend four years to get a full retirement with benefits.

    How many former senators, congressmen and congresswomen are out there living off of those entitlements? How much could be saved if they took a cut? We’ll never know because despite what they say, what they do is take. Perhaps if they had to live within the meager means that most Americans do, they would begin to see the choice they have given us is get rich or get dead.

    “When a man tells you that he got rich through hard work, ask him: Whose?”
    — Don Marquis (1878-1937)

  2. That is the same argument that Palin was attacked for during the ACA debacle. How coincidental you make it once again.

  3. McSally has already shown an independent streak. Rather than go issue by issue, take a look at The Heritage Foundation’s conservatism ratings for Arizona senators and congressmen. Most of Arizona’s GOP members score in the 80-90% range for voting conservative (as judged by Heritage) position. Last I looked, McSally’s conservatism score was 43%. Not non-ideological enough for you? Then maybe your tract is more about political parties than policy.

  4. McSally wont change. She’s as Republican as a right- wing conservative can be. I have to give her credit for being more intelligent than the average Republican but the bar has been set very low for those people.

  5. You can learn things you don’t know from the comments section. (As opposed to the articles themselves)

    ” McSally’s conservatism score was 43%. “

    My thought is that you could get right of that.

  6. What a tightrope these GOP politicians have to walk these days. The actions and results of those depraved, state supported, hacking Russian-spy trespassers may take a long time to unravel, so it is currently hard for an elected politician to hedge a bet and decide what’s best to do. A safer bet, however, is that someday in the future there will be an avalanche of disgrace spread among office holders who stand strong with Trump to assist and attend his cover ups (e.g., Nunes). If Congress cannot utilize its powers to distance committees from the president’s manipulations, and if the president continues to defy the courts through slander, then changes could be profound in a government that loses that vitality of checks and balances. If that happens, then we all will be able to watch a decline in our quality of life for many years to come.

  7. “Independent streak”? Like her vote to sell our privacy to telecom advertisers? They got what they paid her for.

  8. If you are that curious, how do you know she is an idiot? I will bet you missed the magic rings in her ears.

Comments are closed.