LET’S MAKE A BACKROOM DEAL!
The GOP primary in Congressional District 8 is a crowded affair: Republicans Jonathan Paton, Jesse Kelly, Brian Miller, Andy Goss and Jay Quick are all fighting for the chance to take on Democratic Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in November.
For weeks, the district has been abuzz with rumors that Kelly’s team tried to make it a little less crowded by persuading Miller to drop out of the race.
Adam Kwasman, manager of the Kelly campaign, says that’s not the case. He says Miller’s presence in the race actually benefits Jesse, because “Miller is taking votes away from Paton.”
But Miller’s campaign manager, Sam Stone, says that Kwasman had a different perspective when they met for lunch a few months back. At that time, Stone says, Kwasman tried to talk Stone into persuading Miller to drop out of the CD8 race and instead run for the Arizona Legislature.
“He went so far as to offer to raise Brian $50,000 to run against (Republicans) Terri Proud and Vic Williams in (Legislative District 26),” Stone says.
Why would the Kelly camp want Miller out of the race? Stone says polls done by the various campaigns show that “Paton has a marginal lead over Brian and Jesse, and that Brian and Jesse are splitting a fair number of votes between them. Both appeal to a sort of anti-establishment, anti-incumbent mood that’s in the country right now.”
Kwasman admits that he did meet with Stone “to discuss Miller’s political future. … It was complete kibitzing.”
But Kwasman flatly denies offering to raise any money.
“I would love to have $50,000 that I would be able to offer,” he says.
Stone says that Kwasman also offered him a job with Kelly’s office after the election. But Stone didn’t take the offer too seriously.
“Personally, I don’t think there’s any circumstance under which Jesse Kelly is likely to win, either in August or November,” Stone says.
Kwasman denies offering Stone a job.
“I said that Sam’s great at what he does, and I’d love to have him on board,” Kwasman says. “That’s different from making an offer.”
DUCKING DEBATES
Republican state Sen. Al Melvin has declined a challenge by his Democratic challenger, Cheryl Cage, to a series of one-on-one debates before the November general election, saying he can’t fit it into his schedule.
“I told her I’m busy,” Melvin says. “I’m going door to door.”
Cage, who lost the Legislative District 26 Senate race to Melvin in 2008 by fewer than 2,000 votes, says she thinks Melvin won’t debate her because he would have to defend his “abysmal” voting record.
“I mean, it’s completely against what the voters of LD26 want,” she says. “He voted for payday-loan people to stay in business, and 63 percent of our constituents voted against that. He voted 100 percent of the time against public education, and we passed Prop 100 by a 2-to-1 margin.”
Though the two will not debate one-on-one, they will attend several candidate forums alongside other legislative candidates in the coming months.
Melvin says voters can also learn about the candidates on their own.
“I would encourage people to look at her website and look at my website,” Melvin says. “You know politics is education—there are many different ways for the voters to see the positions of the candidates.”
But you won’t be seeing Melvin’s positions on KUAT’s Arizona Illustrated or in the editorial pages of the Arizona Daily Star and The Arizona Republic.
Melvin says he and other Southern Arizona Republican lawmakers are issuing a boycott of the major local media outlets until the news organizations add at least one “center-right” person to their editorial boards.
“They’re totally slanted to the left,” he says. “There is nothing fair and balanced about it, and we’re not going to be a party to it.”
Though they are still talking to reporters from the papers, Melvin says they will not have anything to do with the editorial boards—and will not participate in endorsement interviews.
“The outcome is so obvious from the beginning that it makes no sense for us to participate (in the endorsement process),” he said.
GETTING BY WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM HIS FRIENDS
Green-turned-independent Dave Ewoldt has beaten Democrat-turned-independent Ted Downing‘s effort to get him tossed off the November ballot.
Both men are running against Democrat state Sen. Paula Aboud in midtown Tucson’s Legislative District 28. And both are eschewing party labels.
Downing, who represented LD28 as a Democrat in the House of Representatives for two terms before losing a primary race to Aboud for the Senate seat in 2006, has a big gripe: Aboud and her companion, Terri Berg, helped Ewoldt make the ballot by passing his petitions.
Aboud didn’t return a phone call from us, but Ewoldt says that Aboud and Berg offered to carry some petitions for him, because they’d been talking throughout the spring about the burdensome requirement that he had to collect 655 signatures to make the ballot.
Ewoldt actually could have qualified with just 46 signatures if he had remained a Green, but he decided that he’d have a better shot if he embraced the independent label.
“The Greens are still looked at by Democrats as spoilers,” Ewoldt says. “They’re looked at by Republicans as tree-hugging feminazis.”
DISASTROUS DOWNTOWN DEAL
The Tucson City Council has settled a year-long legal dispute by handing over $750,000 and at least $125,000 in subsidies to downtown developers Scott Stiteler and Don Martin.
The city entered into a predevelopment agreement with a partnership that included Stiteler and Martin back in December 2008. The idea was to give the developers land in exchange for private investment and redevelopment downtown, with a provision calling for the city to pay damages if a development agreement couldn’t be reached.
Last summer, the deal completely fell apart, partly because of complaints from the Rialto Theatre Foundation. Rather than trying to salvage the deal, Stiteler and Martin walked away and then demanded compensation.
Stiteler and Martin will get $750,000 from the city’s strapped budget after they’ve shown that they’ve spent three times that amount fixing up their own properties on Congress Street. They’ll also get $125,000 in permit-fee waivers for that work, and a special, below-market-rate deal on parking spaces in a new city garage. That element of the deal has the new Rio Nuevo board hopping mad, because they want that revenue to help pay for the parking garage.
The city will get money for a piece of downtown land that it’s selling to Stiteler, and the developers will give $50,000 to Skrappy’s Youth Club.
Councilwoman Karin Uhlich considers her support for the predevelopment agreement one of the biggest mistakes of her first term, but says there was “enormous pressure” to approve it.
“I wouldn’t support that kind of provision in the future,” Uhlich says. “Unfortunately, it’s a lesson learned.”
Uhlich calls the settlement “the best we could make in this situation.”
Find early and late-breaking Skinny on The Range, our daily dispatch.
Follow the Skinny scribe on Twitter: @nintzel
This article appears in Jun 24-30, 2010.

I highly doubt the Kelly campaign offered $50,000. Wouldn’t they use that towards their own campaign?
We have been hearing nothing but half-truths, untruths and straight out lies from Miller’s campaign. I don’t trust them.
Why is stone so specific about 50000? I can’t not believe this is true kwasman’s arguments don’t add up…
Max… sonoran has a running segment dedicated to Kelly’s lies…
I’ve heard this about the Kelly Campaign as well; and, the usual denials are going out to everyone. However, I’ve been watching Jesse Kelly and his campaign and in my opinion … it is probably true!
Del who works for the Miller campaign and Adam M. who wants a job with the Paton campaign so bad its pathetic …. You guys are so desperate to take out Kelly that its hilarious. You have nothing to back up this story but lies from the campaign that has been lying since day one. Sucks to be a part of a losing campaign doesn’t it?
Uh huh, sure Sam. The Miller campaign has done nothing but lie their way through this past year. Look’s like somebody needs some attention … and press!
Let us see, Kelly is a known liar and his campaign reflects his lack of integrity. So, why would I believe anything the Kelly Campaign has to say? I don’t believe anyone associated with the Kelly Campaign! They scream at the top of their lungs … you guys lie! But, it is they who lie … they don’t investigate or use common sense to determine truth. Adam has admitted everything with the exception of those acts which are criminal in nature. This alone leads me to believe Sam Stone. And, yes offering assistance to campaign is a bribe and is illegal. Furthermore, offering a position to someone, working for another campaign, as enticement to leave a candidate and before they are elected is also considered a crime! I hope the State of Arizona investigates these allegations.
As someone not part of this whole fray, what lies have each campaign been telling? From my experience Jesse comes off like a jackass everytime he opens his mouth. And I haven’t read anything about Miler lying, so where the hell do you people get this? Please be specific for the rest of us. Thnx.
Here are at least two instances where Jesse Kelly and/or his campaign has lied to the public at large:
http://sbrc1.com/2010/01/08/another-look-a…
You have to read all the comments.
http://sbrc1.com/2010/01/08/another-look-a…
http://gvnews.com/articles/2009/08/25/edit…
I think you start to see a pattern!
The Kelly Campaign has always been deceptive. Jesse Kelly has been asked a lot of question and he just won’t answer them. He evades questions like the plague! He has not real depth in his knowledge anyway. He barely graduated High School and brags about it. Sad! He really isn’t a good choice for public office.
“Del who works for the Miller campaign and Adam M. who wants a job with the Paton campaign so bad its pathetic …”
Who wouldn’t want a job for Miller or for Paton? They are two honorable guys who would do amazing in Washington D.C… I don’t see an insult there to me or Del really…
Keep it positive Kelly supporters, I know it’s tough when you get bad news like this article but don’t go throwing infantile tantrums just because your guy caught a bad media break midweek in June…
Personally, I believe the contents of the article. It seems that Mr. Kwasman admits to a majority of the information, yet has denied the allegation of $50K and the offering a position to Mr. Stone. Both of these can get him into legal trouble, so I believe that these are convenient untruths by Mr. Kwasman to keep him out of incurring legal problems.
The real issue is that do we really want to vote for a guy with so much baggage of untruths and misbehavior attached to him, his campaign and even his family! I do not think that he is a good candidate and is the greater evil of the mess of candidates. If we want better elected officials, we have to start with more ethical, moral and honest candidates. This man appears NOT to have any of those qualities.
First of all, the Kelly campaign could not necessarily take $50,000 for their own campaign as I’m sure those donations would come from many of the max donors that are by law not allowed to donate any more to his campaign (ie. His family and his campaign managers family who have all max donated for both the primary and general election already). The Kelly campaign has been caught in a running list of lies and deceit. The other two campaigns, not one. It’s a shame Kelly is trying to run an anti-establishment campaign, but has been the first one to jump on any endorsement he can get. I ask, where is his loyalty? Certainly not to the citizens of CD 8. We don’t need another power hungry politician in Washington.
The fact is, we don’t have any concrete or even half way reasonable proof that any of this happened. It all just amount to mud slinging.
We should vote based on the issues and forget these same-old same-old methods of mud slinging. Otherwise we will be part of the problem we are trying to correct: a corrupt and broken political system.
Why don’t we look at voting records etc. and see who is a true conservative instead?
Funny Froggey, Adam Kwasman stated that he recorded the conversation! He could clear this up for us if he wanted to! I tend to believe the Miller people.