Credit: Courtesy of Wikimedia

The three Democratic candidates for governor—Steve Farley, David Garcia and Kelly Fryer—debated at UA Saturday, April 7. They covered a lot of ground, but I want to focus on their statements about education.

Full Disclosure: I haven’t decided who I’m going to vote for in the Democratic gubernatorial primary, though I do know who I’m voting for in the general: the last Democrat standing. Any one of them will be a vast improvement over the current officeholder, who somehow manages to call himself “the education governor” with a straight face. So I’m reporting what I heard at the debate, not expressing any personal preferences.

Though the three Democrats varied a bit, they stand pretty close together in their overall views about education and miles away from Doug Ducey, meaning they’re for strong, well funded public education, including a substantial raise for teachers. All three agreed teachers should get at least a 20 percent raise. Fryer wants it to be 25 percent. Farley wants a 20 percent raise for the classified staff as well.

The only direct question about education in the debate was about where the new education money will come from.

The three had different proposals for how to add money to the state budget: raising taxes on the wealthy, getting rid of corporate tax exemptions or a combination of the two. None of them suggested we increase the sales tax.

David Garcia presented a both/and funding proposal. He wants to reverse corporate tax exemptions — carve-outs which allow specific corporations to pay lower taxes — and get rid of private school tax credits. He also wants to increase taxes on the one percenters. The result, he said, will be a more progressive tax structure in Arizona, which is currently one of the most regressive in the country. Garcia didn’t put a dollar figure on the amount his plan would bring in.

Steve Farley said the state has 330 corporate tax loopholes, and by ending some of the loopholes, we can bring in $3 billion. He will use $2 billion for education spending, which is more than enough to cover a 20 percent raise for teachers as well as classified staff. The remaining billion dollars will be used to lower the sales tax by one percent.

Kelly Fryer doesn’t believe much money can be raised by getting rid of corporate tax loopholes, so she essentially discarded that idea. She recommended a variety of ways to tax the rich. She wants to increase taxes for people who make over a million a year. According to the Economic Policy Institute, the income of Arizona’s one percenters begins at $309,000, so she’s looking at a smaller pool of taxpayers than Garcia. However, she also wants to put a sales property tax on every home over a million dollars, as well as what she calls a “vacation tax” on people who own homes in Arizona but don’t actually live here. Fryer said her plan will raise $2.7 billion, and she’ll give teachers a 25 percent raise.

Funding was the only education question the candidates were asked to respond to, but they added other education-related ideas to the discussion as well.

Steve Farley stressed his strong support for public schools. His parents were public school teachers, he said, and his two daughters went to public schools. He criticized the poor funding levels and the resulting shortage of teachers and counselors in our schools as well as our crumbling school infrastructure. He called schools “the best tool we’ve ever invented to allow people to lift themselves out of poverty,” and said we can fund them adequately without adding to the financial burden of the poor and middle class. He emphasized that his legislative experience as both a representative and a senator will allow him to work across the aisle and pull together the votes needed to get rid of corporate tax breaks.

David Garcia presented the most specific recommendations, which isn’t surprising since he’s an education professor at ASU, was an assistant superintendent with the Department of Education and ran for Superintendent of Public Instruction in 2014. He condemned “the Koch brothers approach to education in this state. They cut, then they criticize the schools because they don’t improve.” Talking directly to teachers, he said, “Teachers, we’re going to treat you like professionals.” That means paying teachers adequately, and more. “Teachers, we’re going to let you teach,” he continued. “We’re going to roll back and cut back on our fascination with standardized testing. . . . There are no multiple choices in life. The more we prepare students for multiple choice questions, the less prepared they are for life after high school.”

Kelly Fryer made a few general statements about education, mentioning she had been a teacher and she benefited greatly from her own education. However, she focused more on her experiences working with the community as CEO of the YWCA.

6 replies on “The Democratic Gubernatorial Candidates On Education”

  1. Go back and read the paragraph you wrote about Garcia and his “specifics.” You’ll find nothing but heated rhetoric and shopworn platitudes. Ducey and his backers are praying that we nominate Garcia, a well-meaning and charismatic man to be sure, but not someone who can go toe to toe with Ducey on the facts. They would love it if our nominee for governor was a college professor and former ADE bureaucrat who wants his first elected job to be leading our state. On Saturday night, the main arguments Garcia made about the potential strength of his candidacy were related to his surname, which is another line of attack Ducey and his dark money haters can’t wait to exploit. Democrats and friends of public schools who want to truly wage a substantive fight against Ducey would be wise to avoid once again hoping that Garcia has what it takes to defeat our enemies.

  2. Most of us supports Garcia for State Sup. His loss was an embarrassment to the incompetent Douglas. I am concerned that if Garcia supports public education, does he sit on a charter school board? Charter schools ARE NOT public schools. They are private schools, often family, crony run or for profit businesses, receiving public money.

  3. So is Garcia the only one promising to eliminate private school tax credits? Safier’s summary doesn’t mention that “policy initiative” for the other two candidates.

    Catholics (over 1,000,000 of AZ’s voters) will definitely be keeping an eye on who, if elected, may be intending to strike a death blow to the Catholic school system in Arizona, because that’s what eliminating private school tax credits would mean at this point.

  4. “They (Kochs) cut, then they criticize the schools because they don’t improve.”

    Not true.

    Schools did improve, at least up to 2015, despite the cuts or maybe because of the cuts and the Kochs spent a tone of money on ads in Arizona to say so. Arizona had the highest combined math and reading score gains in the nation from 2011 to 2015.

  5. Falcon9? A comment from Falcon9, one of the anonymous handles John Huppenthal used? While I respect commenters’ anonymity, it would put my mind at rest to see a comment from the commenter saying he/she is not Huppenthal. Or if it is Huppenthal, him saying it was just a slip of the keyboard.

Comments are closed.