Red for Ed supporters join a September 2018 protest against the removal of the Invest in Education initiative from the November 2018 ballot. Credit: Jim Byrne

While hundreds of thousands of votes still remain to be counted in the state, it appears a proposition to hike income tax on Arizona’s highest earns to fund education programs is likely to pass.

As of Wednesday, Nov. 4, Proposition 208 had the support of 53 percent of voters and was leading by 265,589 votes.

That lead has narrowed from last night, when supporters of Prop 208, Invest in Education, declared victory in their push to approve the 3.5% surcharge on income exceeding $250,000 for single tax filings, or $500,000 for joint filings. The elevated tax rate would go into effect for tax years beginning in 2021.

The funds from Prop 208, also known as the Invest in Education Act, would go toward hiring teachers and classroom support personnel while increasing their base salary and funding supplementary education programs.

After analyzing the first major drop of returns, Invest in Education announced their victory at a virtual press conference last night at 8:30 p.m.

Rebecca Gau, the executive director of Stand for Children Arizona, part of the coalition in support of 208, says the decision to declare victory was made with careful consideration of the likelihood the proposition would pass.

“We were very aware of the kind of lead we needed with the initial results that get released from the Secretary of State, and we looked at our models, and it was pretty clear that although the numbers would change over the night, we knew there was no way that they could make up the difference, and there still is no way they can make up the difference,” Gau said.

Garrick Taylor, the executive vice president for the Arizona Chamber of Commerce, part of the opposition group against 208, said the call was made too early.

“The results might hold, but typically holding a victory press conference 30 minutes after the polls close would be viewed as premature,” Taylor said. “They can do what they want, I’ll just say it was unusually early.”

He also expressed concerns about Arizona’s voters leaning toward supporting the initiative, which would bump Arizona’s top individual tax rate from 4.5 to 8 percent, causing the state to rank in the top 10 for the highest personal income tax rate in the U.S.

Once all the votes are counted, if Prop 208 does pass, Gau says it would “represent a huge change that Arizonans needed to see.”

“It’s creating educational and economic opportunities for all Arizona students. But there are provisions in it that will help those who need it most in a lot of ways as well. And it looks like voters agreed,” Gau said. “We’re looking forward to a different way of thinking about education in Arizona that’s not controlled by politicians, but that respects the needs of the classroom and the needs of our students.”

Prop 208 has roots in the “Red for Ed” movement in 2018 when teachers protested salary and school budget cuts. Invest in Education tried to push a similar proposition that year, but the Arizona Supreme Court removed it from the ballot.

Gau said after the measure failed in 2018, Invest in Education “went back to the drawing board,” meeting with attorneys, business leaders and education professionals to solidify the 2020 ballot measure.

“This was definitely a stronger proposal, both in terms of the funding mechanism and also in terms of how money is going to be spent. It’s going to directly impact some really key needs in our state,” she said. “It is a direct result of the Red for Ed movement, and I think it finally gets it over the finish line for all those teachers who hung out at the Capitol in the heat in the spring of 2018.”

10 replies on “Prop Hiking Income Taxes on Highest Earners To Fund Education Appears Likely to Pass”

  1. “Invest in Education” is a lie. Whenever politicians speak of “investing” you know they’re lying. The teachers’ union won, the kids in AZ won’t see a difference.

  2. Yes they will. Things always get worse with more money. It eliminates needed self control and examination.

  3. I might remind you Barbara that 90% of antifa rioters claim to have college educations. Something is wrong with public education. They are destroying the US.

  4. Interesting that the voters in Illinois—repeat—blue Illinois, rejected a tax increase on the “rich.”

  5. More interesting is that PA —repeat—red PA, would vote for Biden to end fracking and destroy their economy.

    I am starting to have second thoughts about this complete election. The democrats are looking very bad. Something is definitely amiss.

    Now I look back at Russia, Ukraine, Hunter’s laptop, Joe’s lies, Iran Deal, Impeachment and all the things the democrats lied about….and I ask myself, are they lying again?

    They do have a proven track record. Let’s find the evidence and clean them out.

  6. Jessie

    The dems are corrupt, so of course they’re lying. That’s actually redundant and doesn’t need repeating. They cheat at everything and harassed our president unmercifully for his entire term. Now they ask for “unity” and “coming together.” I haven’t heard, “reach across the aisle” yet, but it’s coming. Whenever Republican reach across the aisle, their pockets get picked by the dems other hand.

    There’s a reason Biden has a crooked smile.

  7. Those are some serious deflections there wess. Dems are corrupt cheating liars? Have you been in a coma for the past 5 years? Your Grifter Old Party are the masters of being corrupt cheating liars. Snap out of it and pay attention.

    Dems harassed the president unmercifully? Where do I begin with that nonsense? The simple fact is that when you run on a platform of hate, it will eventually get tossed back at you. All tRump ever does is stoke infernos. The fact that you are blind to this speaks volumes about your character.

    And sure, Biden may have a crooked smile, but at least he can smile. All tRump has is that smug “it’s all about me” look on his head. In those rare times when he actually does smile it looks forced and extremely unnatural. The look gives you the impression that he’s either really constipated or he forgot to put on his diaper and he’s struggling to hold liquid in. The baby-man has more than earned any harassment he has received.

  8. No, no, no wess. The word you’re looking for in place of “deflection” is “reality”. I understand that you CONservatives aren’t that much into reality as an actual thing, but, you should at least be able to type out the word. How did you enjoy the rest of the truth that I typed out for you?

Comments are closed.