It’s hardly an unbiased source, but the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee today released the results of a survey that showed Congressman Ron Barber leading his Republican challenger, Martha McSally, by 14 percentage points in the race for Congressional District 2.

The survey of 400 likely voters, conducted Sept. 27-30 by Grove Insight, showed that 54 percent like Barber, while 40 percent were behind McSally. Only 6 percent of the voters were undecided.

The survey also showed that Barber was viewed favorably by 51 percent of voters and unfavorably by 32 percent. The numbers weren’t as positive for McSally; 38 percent had a favorable impression, while 32 percent had an unfavorable impression.

Daniel Scarpinato, the former Arizona Daily Star reporter who now serves as a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, dismissed the survey in an emailed comment.

“Democrats know this poll is completely bogus,” Scarpinato said. “If it were even close to accurate, then why are they planning to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in television ads beginning this week to distract from Ron Barber’s record of walking lock-step with Nancy Pelosi?”

The poll shows a larger lead for Barber than earlier surveys. A July survey by Team Barber showed him with a 13-point lead, while an August poll by Team McSally showed Barber with 5-point lead.

We suspect the race is closer than the DCCC survey shows, but we’d guess that Barber is still in the lead. His name ID is still a lot higher than McSally’s in the district and the national mood has been shifting in the direction of Democrats, so she’s got a steep hill to climb to pull off an upset in Southern Arizona. On top of that, the NRCC has yet to reserve air time here in Southern Arizona, which suggests the NRCC and other third-party groups don’t see much value in backing McSally—and given that the targeting map is mercilessly poll-driven, that means the polls can’t be that good for her right now.

Getting hassled by The Man Mild-mannered reporter

5 replies on “New DCCC Poll Shows Barber Leading McSally By 14 Percentage Points, but NRCC Calls Survey “Completely Bogus””

  1. The idea that a campaign would stop trying to win (with TV ads, for example) simpy because it was winning is illogical. Why would a federal campaign with a fair amount of money simply cease spending money on the campaign a month out from election day? Scarpinato could have challenged the sample, sample size, the method, etc., but didn’t, because he has nothing but fallacious reasoning to back up his criticism.

  2. Were I a search consultant for the Republican National Committee, I’d consider Colonel McSally an ideal candidate for a generic Congressional district almost anywhere in the country, provided her political philosophy wasn’t too conservative for the district. A district where she had lived intermittently during her Air Force career would seem nearly perfect. But the district served by Stewart and Mo Udall, Jim McNulty and Jim Kolbe, Gabby Giffords and now Ron Barber, is not a generic district in search of a generic candidate. All its members have had roots here, in Congressman Barber’s case since high school.
    i’m not a search consultant for the RNC; I’m a 17 year Tanque Verde Valley resident and a Democratic volunteer in every campaign in CD8 and now CD2 since Gabby first ran in 2006. I walk and I talk and I listen, and everywhere I’ve gone since February I’ve encountered people who know,like and admire Ron. I’m convinced that Ron Barber is the representative tailor-made for the district. The home he’s lived in for decades is in the district; his 45 year employment career is in the district. He served the district as Gabby’s District Director, responsible for the exemplary constituent services which have been a tradition in the district. His politics are moderate, centrist, even bipartisan.

Comments are closed.