Credit: Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

The Green New Deal is an aspirational list of ideas of ways we can improve the environment and lift people’s standards of living.

Do we need a Green New Deal? Is it doable? Can we afford it? Democrats are asking those questions seriously while Republicans pretend the GND would mean an end to hamburgers, milkshakes and airplanes.

The best thing about the Green New Deal is people are forced to talk about climate change and the environment. The topics now have a place at the political table. The more politicians and others talk about them, the better the chances we’ll do something to address them.

On another front, some Democratic presidential candidates are advocating for Medicare for All. Others are calling for a private/public partnership which guarantees health care for everyone.

What’s the best way to deliver health care to the most people? How will we pay for it? Democrats are holding a vigorous debate on the topic while Republicans make another stab at killing Obamacare and claim to have a plan of their own, something which they’ve been talking about for years but have yet to unveil.

This is another issue which no presidential candidate can avoid talking about. Like the environment, health care has a seat at the political table. It cannot be ignored, and that’s a good thing.

Kamala Harris, Democratic candidate for president, has pulled another chair up to the table, this one for teachers. Harris says teachers are underpaid and under-appreciated, and she wants to increase their salaries using a combination of federal and state funding.

Should we increase teacher pay? Can we afford it? What’s the best way to do it? Thanks to Harris, every Democratic candidate will have to address those issues, and Republicans will have to figure out how to fight against a salary increaseย without sounding like they hate teachers and children. The discussion and debate will increase the possibility that teachers around the country will see a substantial pay increase sometime in the not-too-distant future.

Thank you, Kamala Harris.

The details of Harris’ teacher salary proposal are less important than her making it one of her signature issues. Still, the specifics are important. Here is what she proposes. (You can read Harris’ statement in her op ed in the Washington Post.)

First, the federal government will fund a 10 percent raise for teachers across the board.

Next, for every dollar a state puts into raising teacher salaries, the federal government will put in three dollars.

Special consideration will be given to teachers working in schools whose communities are most in need. Harris wants to make sure teachers in those communities are paid more than other professionals whose educational qualifications are similar to teachers’. That bears repeating. Right now, teachersย make significantly less than their counterparts in other professions. Harris wants teachers working in needy communities to make more. Be still, my heart.

According to Harris, these investments will bring more people into teaching at a time when we’re suffering from teacher shortages, and it will encourage people who have the talent and inclination to be great teachers to enter the profession and stay there, knowing they can make a decent living for themselves and their families on a teacher’s salary.

How will Harris pay for all this? I’ll let her do the talking.

We will pay for this plan by increasing the estate tax for the top 1 percent of taxpayers and cracking down on loopholes that let the very wealthiest, with estates worth multiple millions or billions of dollars, avoid paying their fair share.

Harris joins the chorus of Democratic candidates singing the praises of increasing taxes on the rich. It’s yet another issue that has found a place at the table this presidential election.

We’re going to have a whole lot of stuff to talk about this campaign season.

7 replies on “Kamala Harris Wants To Raise Teachers’ Salaries”

  1. So teachers will be part of the socialist redistribution of wealth. We get it. Got it. Trump 2020.

    Wouldn’t they be better served to unionize and have lobbyists in DC?

  2. It would be easier to just take 90% of the wealth of those evil rich guys and give teachers a huge raise.

  3. Since the late 60’s when I entered the work force, the national minimum wage has fallen to 60-65% of what it was. Since the pay scale of 85-90% of all workers is scaled to the base pay it has led to the American worker’s wages falling in tandem. The rich and mega corps on the other hand make 10 times what they did (after inflation). So yes, the class war was already held, the wealth has already been redistributed. The 0.1% has already won. You 2, lost and don’t even know it. So sad.

  4. “The best thing about the Green New Deal is people are forced to talk about climate change” — nailed it.
    I read a study showing something like 75% of people believe climate change is a problem. But only about 30% would pay $10 a month to do anything about it.
    Sometimes I lose my faith in humanity just a little bit.

  5. I’d pay $100 a month…easily. We only have one world, there’s no need to over exploit it. Sad that, if you’re correct, 25% of people don’t understand and/or outright refuse to understand that. I witnessed that douche nozzle Pat Robertson say that we should take advantage of every resource we can because God will take care of us no matter how much we use and abuse all the resources on this planet. Seriously!? You and your followers are going to rely on your non-existent sky-pixie to take care of something we as the human race should be taking care of? Absolutely incredible!

  6. The US is the largest contributor to global warming according to scientists. How can they allow more people into the country? They must start calling for deportations.

Comments are closed.