We need to stop playing games with the issue of climate change. The situation is deadly serious. We have just come out of the warmest year on record, and all the recorded 10 hottest years on the planet have occurred since 1998. The online journal Science Advances has predicted that the Southwest is entering a period of drought that will be the worst in 1,000 years.
While climate change is certainly the biggest single threat the planet is facing, it’s not the only one. Faced with endless resource wars, freshwater depletion, habitat loss, soil depletion, nuclear threatsand unrestrained mining and extractivism, the prognosis is not good. In fact, the situation is so bad that since 1970, global biodiversity has declined 30 percent , with a 60 percent rate in tropical areas, and freshwater biodiversity has declined by 55 percent and by 33 percent in the oceans. That is why Tucson’s upcoming official Earth Day Parade and Festival is so very out of step with what the times call for. Despite the intentions of many good people involved, and whatever legitimate efforts are represented, they will be participating in a spectacle of green washing—a celebration of an unsustainable status quo dressed up in earth tones.
We are at such a dire point in our natural history that we have no choice but to pursue radical (as in getting to the root of the problem) solutions, or we are going to lose everything. There is no time left for half measures and false solutions. The sponsors of this corporate Earth Day not only do us a disservice, but actively divert us from the gravity of the situation and the kind of response we need to give.
The four primary or “platinum” sponsors of Tucson’s Earth Day events are the City of Tucson, the Central Arizona Project, Quick Print and the Southern Arizona Environmental Management Society.
The backing of the Southern Arizona Environmental Management Society (SAEMS) is an affront to all true environmentalists. Included among its member organizations are Rosemont Copper, Raytheon and Materion Ceramics, formerly known as Brush Wellman. Some of the other 200 corporate and government members include Alcoa Aluminum, the City of Tucson Department of Environmental Services, Tucson Water’s Water Quality Division and the still majority coal burning Tucson Electric Power. Not featured among their ranks are the kinds of grassroots groups and movements most of us associate with environmental activism.
This is not a bottom-up kind of group attuned to the voices of the people, but rather, an organization that represents the voices of boardrooms and shareholders.
Are we to believe that the heads of Raytheon care anything about the ecological health of our region, much less the planet? Rather, they see global warming as an opportunity to make more money. In her book This Changes Everything, Naomi Klein writes that, “…in a moment of candor, the weapons giant Raytheon explained, ‘Expanded business opportunities are likely to arise as consumer behavior and needs change in response to climate change.’ Those opportunities include not just more demand for the company’s privatized disaster response services but also ‘demand for its military products and services as security concerns may arise as results of droughts, floods, and storm events occur as a result of climate change.’ This is worth remembering whenever doubts creep in about the urgency of this crisis: the private militias are already mobilizing.”
The goals of war profiteers like Raytheon and Materion are in direct conflict with the goals of the climate justice and ecological movements. According to an article by David Querio in Biz Tucson, “Raytheon, the world’s largest missile manufacturer, builds missiles for just about everybody except rogue nations. The Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines bear missiles from Tucson, as do the militaries of 40 countries. Any time your hear about Tomahawk, Sidewinder or Stinger missiles, they were designed and manufactured in Tucson by Raytheon.
Since 1954 the company has produced and delivered more than one million missiles.”
Rare is the voice that proclaims anything about missiles as environmentally friendly.
Earth Day co-sponsor Materion is a producer of beryllium ceramic products the uses of which include essential applications for the nuclear and military industries. Beryllium dust and fumes that result from the production process are harmful both to the company’s workers and the community. The Arizona Daily Star reported that some 35 employees of the Materion/Brush Wellman plant have contracted beryllium disease, which leads to fatalities in about a third of those affected, leaving those who survive with lifelong disabilities. It was revealed in 2009 that the US Department of Justice had paid out $1.4 million toward compensation and care of disease sufferers. In 2001, Materion, in its past incarnation as Brush Wellman, was penalized $145,000 for releasing beryllium dust into the air via a clothes dryer. Materion’s new agreement with Pima County lets the plant self monitor its safety features. SAEMS is connected to the military-industrial complex in other ways as well. A 2010 letter from SAEMS President Kristie Kilgore notes that
“Collaborating with environmental community members such as Davis-Monthan Air Force Base…provides a forum to learn from one another on fronts such as sustainability and contingency planning.”
This is, once again, typical green washing, casting the Air Force base as an “environmental community member” concerned with “sustainability.” We tend to turn a blind eye to the ecological effects of militarism and when we don’t, there are actually exemptions and gag rules in place to circumvent or outright prohibit breaching this issue. For instance, the United Nations climate summits fully cooperate with a rule that exempts the US military from discussion in negotiations.
The US military is on of the world’s largest energy consumers, responsible for 90 percent of US government fuel consumption. It constitutes the world’s single largest institutional purchaser of petroleum products and single largest institutional emitter of green house gasses. According to a 2005 report by the American Forces Information Service, “Jet fuel constitutes nearly 70 percent of the Department of Defense’s petroleum product purchases.” With a US military budget that roughly is equal to the rest of the world’s combined military expenditures, and with globetrotting military advisers and multiple and endless wars and bases around the world–that’s a whole lot of jet fuel. We already see how companies like SAEMS’s Raytheon and Materion are linked dependently to the military. But there is no need to in turn link them to Earth Day.
Davis-Monthan is sometimes trumpeted as an environmentally friendly base by virtue of its large array of solar panels. But even if the military and big corporations are to develop new, clean energy sources, that’s simply not sufficient. The military and its industrial allies exist not so much to “protect our freedoms” as to protect the access of global corporations to resources and markets. Even if every bomber were solar powered, what we can expect from the marriage of militarism and unrestrained capitalism is more resource wars, more extraction, more privatization and more profit.
Let’s be clear that it’s not the workers at Raytheon and Materion who are to blame. We should stand shoulder to shoulder with these workers to demand safe conditions and economic conversion from a war economy to one that is focused on healing our planet, fixing our national infrastructure and taking care of our people. During the large marches against the Iraq War, more than a few Raytheon employees marched with us. One engineer told us that Raytheon would be well suited to convert to light rail production. We don’t want these workers to lose their jobs. We want their jobs to be for peace and the planet.
The green washing that we will see at Tucson’s official Earth Day events will extend beyond issues of war and militarism. Witness the participation of Rosemont Copper as an SAEMS member. Just this month of March, another ocelot has been photographed in the Santa Rita mountain area threatened by Rosemont’s proposed copper mine. The mine also puts at risk jaguar habitat and an important and sensitive water table. Canadian based Augusta Resources, the proposed mine’s parent company, reports the mine will use “approximately 5,000 acre-feet per year delivered at 5,000 gallons per minute.” An issue paper by Rosemont Mine Truth states, “To put that amount of water into perspective, the Rosemont Mine will consume the water of over 15,000 households each year it operates … The Rosemont Mine will be located at the headwaters of Davidson Canyon in the Cienega Creek Watershed. According to Augusta’s documents, at well over a mile wide and up to a half mile deep, the pit … will be larger than the Berkely Pit in Butte, Montana, a closed copper mine that became one of the nation’s largest superfund sites.” A proper grassroots, peoples Earth Day would be protesting and denouncing this mine, not providing it cover.
It is also not enough to just denounce militarism and corporations that assault the Earth. The issue of climate change, or rather, climate justice, and other ecological threats cannot be adequately confronted without the participation of government. But what we don’t need is for the city and county to support a military-industrial-extractivist Earth Day.
The Arizona Peace Council and Alliance for Global Justice are coming together with other activists and sincere environmentalists to be present at this years official Earth Day celebration to protest this green washing and to present an alternative, indeed, a reminder of what that original Earth Day back in 1970 was all about. We want to take back Earth Day, to bring it back to its activist roots. We will call for real solutions, not false ones, and we will we will advocate for our elected officials to pursue policies that put people and planet before profits.
We are not alone in this. We are working with coalitions locally, nationally and internationally to develop a calendar of actions as similarly minded people around the world take the road to Paris,
December, 2015. That is where the United Nations is charged with coming up with new measures for dealing with climate change.
Unfortunately, the doors of these summits are open to big businesses, but closed to most of us, and the process is producing many a declaration, but very little that is substantive and enforceable. That is why we must be there from Tucson to Washington, D.C. to Paris, demanding system change, not climate change.
Why is it important to take back Earth Day? Because by doing so, we begin to take back our movement. We begin to save the Earth, not from the top down, but from the grassroots up.
James Jordan is a Tucson resident and activist, and national co-coordinator for the Alliance for Global Justice.
This article appears in Apr 2-8, 2015.

C’mon. This is America. Of course Raytheon and Rosemont are bankrolling the parade. Money is the state religion. Who’s gonna pay for the cops? The toilets? Not the Sierra Club, they’re volunteers.
Besides, if we all just get a Prius instead of a Hummer, it will all be rainbows and unicorns, right? Everyone knows gas loses it’s carbon when you put it in a prius; the hybrid synergy drive catalyses it into dihydrogen oxide, and it neutralizes the effects of gluten and high-fructose corn syrup as a nice bonus! I’m trying to buy rights to the chimney output of the cement plant up in Marana to boot – a real goldmine (why aren’t they also on the earth day board anyway?)…
All those cauldrons of methane boiling off in the arctic ocean and Yamal are sure to replace fracking and lead to our clean energy promised land. It’s different this time. Jobs for everyone!!!
Looks like we have stopped talking about the science. take another bong hit everybody….
System change is needed and the first system that should be changed is our monetary system. Present U.S. monetary system is used by threat of force from the U.S. military across the globe. In this system almost the entirety of what we use for money is created by banks when they make loans. As the loans are paid off the money is extinguished on the banks books and no longer exists. The banks are allowed to charge and keep interest and fees for money that they have created. Since only the principal amount of the loan is created as money and nothing is created for the interest and fees that also must be repaid, it is a system designed to put and keep us all in debt. At this it is succeeding very well.
Since the banks create the money, they get to make the decision on that for which it is to be used. Understandably environmental uses are behind whatever is last on the list. Money creation should be done debt-free by our federal government. Money would then be spent not loaned into existence for the actual things that people value — clean air, clean water, clean renewable sustainable energy, a real healthcare plan, rebuilding our broken infrastructure, etc.
Linking Social Justice to Monetary Reform explains it all.
http://www.alpheus.org/linking-social-justice-to-monetary-reform/
Excellent article. All but for the same omission every individual and ‘environmental’ group makes when talking about climate change. All ignore the elephant in the room: livestock raising. Not one word about animal agriculture. Not one word about factory farms. And yet they are the single most responsible party for the emission of greenhouse gasses – more than all the cars, trucks, buses, airplanes and ships together in the world combined. More than all the jet fuel you, James Jordan, are talking about.
Yes, Confined Animal Feeding Operations produce 18 percent of the world’s greenhouse gasses according to the United Nations. World Watch in Washington, DC states the true figure is a staggering 51 percent.
Yes, James Jordan: “We need to stop playing games with the issue of climate change. The situation is deadly serious.” But I can’t take you seriously until you face up to the meat industry.
Apparently you not afraid of Raytheon and Materion. But why then do you fear Cargill, Tyson Foods, and Smithfield Foods? There are 32 meat packing plants in Arizona. There are 63 beef cattle feedlots in Arizona. There are 920,000 cows in Arizona, all farting and shitting. That’s where the greenhouse gas methane comes from and methane is up to 100 more potent than C02.
“We are at such a dire point in our natural history that we have no choice but to pursue radical (as in getting to the root of the problem) solutions, or we are going to lose everything. There is no time left for half measures and false solutions.”
We have no choice than to pursue the radical solution of veganism.
Come to the Reclaim Earth Day for Earth and all Living Beings booth at the Earth Day event on April 18, 9-2 at Reid Park
Thanks to James and TW for pointing this out. Again. I quit going to Earth Day celebrations a long time ago after Exxon and others began to co-opt them. But I have never forgotten the original intent of the Earth Day. We need to keep calling out the corporations and individuals that collectively work to push the planet over the brink just so they can have more money to live out their last days in comfort. And I include the politicians who pimp these services in that group as well.
Excellent article. Thanks, James. Sadly, it is no longer shocking to hear a manufacturer of killing machines brag how the company will profit from the coming resource wars resulting from climate scorching. War is a good business for the few that the many have to shut down. Conversion from war to peacetime manufacturing. Conversion from fossil and nuclear to sustainable.
I have some questions on this piece. Mr. Jordan has indicated that we have no choice but to pursue radical solutions to climate change, but seems to also want to exclude big industry from participating in these solutions. I wonder what we will accomplish if we bar the groups who are arguably the largest contributors to climate change. While grassroots organizations do great work to help conserve and restore our natural resources, they are by their nature, limited in resources themselves, and more radical solutions may be attainable by pressuring (hence including) industry to make changes in their practices. These companies track their waste, not by the pound, but by the ton. If we can include them in sustainable practices, we can reduce landfill waste, air emissions, water quality degradation, and more, by much larger amounts than by pressuring small, home-grown companies, whose contribution to pollution and climate change is negligible by comparison. Should big industry do more to reduce their footprint? Yes, always yes. Will they do so if excluded from environmental organizations and events? Unlikely. I say they should be involved with these organizations so that the community at large can hold them responsible for reducing their emissions, waste, and climate change contribution. I’d like to know what Mr. Jordon thinks of this stance.
I also question the criticism of the southern Arizona environmental management society. They do have such industry members, but they also participate in highway cleanup events, grants to local schools for environmental projects, and support hight education through scholarships to students pursuing environmental degrees here in Tucson, which seems, to me, very in line with grassroots efforts this article advocates for. I don’t understand, outside of their membership, what offends Mr. Jordon about this organization.
What, precisely, should we be doing on Earth Day to move alternatives forward? I’m all for it, but need some specific direction, other than simply protesting. Is there literature to distribute, a booth to staff with information about alternatives, etc.? Many well-intentioned people are very busy – I have a business to run, and have just lost my husband. If given some very detailed, specific actions to commit to, I believe many – certainly I – would step up. Please give us that information…thanks!
Reveal yourself, “A ConcernedTucsonon”. Only cowards hide behind their messages.
What makes you say that? It’s not true.
The most proactive individual act you can make towards reducing climate change effects is to eat a plant based diet. Meat and dairy products produce almost 20% of greenhouse gases.
Before judging SAEMS, one might take the time to research the roots of the organization. SAEMS was established as an educational forum for regulated industry and environmental professionals in southern Arizona, including offering continuing education, service to the community through clean up days, and networking to achieve higher standards. It was an honor to serve on the board of directors for many years in an era when SAEMS welcomed all environmental professionals to the forum to share multiple perspectives. Through sharing we learn, grow and are able to work together even when we hold opposing view points. Kristie