Voting has always been considered a cornerstone of our democratic processes. It is how we keep our government officials in line, hiring or firing them as we see fit.
As voters, we must always look closely at government officials who endeavor to change the process by which we hire and fire them.
Democratic Tucson City Councilman Richard Fimbres brought up the idea of making November’s city election a vote-by-mail affair at a City Council meeting in March. The public hearing was held at the council meeting on April 5, and the council voted 5-2 to make November’s election vote by mail.
The city charter does allow for the designation of any election to be a “mail ballot election.” However, the questions that immediately come to mind are, “Why?” and, “Why now?”
Councilmembers Fimbres and Regina Romero spoke of saving money and increasing voter participation as compelling reasons for mail ballots, and they point out a national trend toward mail ballots; Oregon has been using mail-only balloting since voters approved a citizens’ initiative in 1998. I don’t argue that there is a trend; I am happy to stipulate that the rise of mail ballots is a national problem. Regarding voter participation and supposed cost savings, they are more wishful thinking than fact.
Research performed in California, and sponsored by the Pew Center on the States, shows that the introduction of mail-ballot-only systems actually reduces participation by 13.2 percent overall, while reducing participation of urban, Asian and Hispanic voters 50, 30.3 and 27.3 percent, respectively. It also shows a 5.99 percent participation advantage for Democrats over Republicans.
Research done at the University of Oregon contradicts these findings, but the data were derived from survey responses, not by tracking individual voters through four cycles, as the California study did.
Anyway, I am not the only one who believes that the act of voting should not be equivalent to the act of paying your sewer bill. Voting is something for which you should take time. It is serious. Right now, “early” or “absentee” ballots may be requested from the city clerk by people who may not be able to go to polling places. The change to all-mail ballots seems to make a difference only for those who are not serious about elections.
This is better?
There are some good arguments for cost savings, though much of what is saved on poll workers is spent on additional printing and postage. Though this November’s election will be a mail-ballot vote in Tucson, by law, the city must still provide at least one polling place per ward, and the city will also provide drop-off facilities for those who prefer hand-delivery to mailing the ballot. The duty of ensuring accurate elections is probably not the first place to turn for cutting fiscal corners.
So, what’s the real story? If the Democrats believe in mail ballots, why don’t they go for a charter change instead of this one-time deal? Well? Republican Steve Kozachik, with a second from Democrat Paul Cunningham, made a motion to put the idea on the November ballot so the people could decide whether or not to change the way we hire officials. It was voted down by the rest of the officials.
The answers to, “Why” and, “Why now?” may be one and the same. In the last City Council election, the Democrats lost Ward 6 to Republican Kozachik, and came within a couple of hundred votes of losing Ward 3 to Republican Ben Buehler-Garcia. Those results, and current national trends, must have Democrats squirming in their chairs. Something must be done to influence the outcome of the election this go-round, and what better way to do that than with mail-in ballots? We all learned in grade school about “chain of custody” of ballots, whether they were machine ballots or paper cards, which prevent any hanky-panky. There is no chain of custody with mail ballots.
I’m not accusing Democrats of conspiring to commit voter fraud. I’m just trying to come up with a believable explanation for this one-shot mail-in deal, and the rejection of the more reasonable referendum suggestion. Any ideas?
This article appears in Apr 14-20, 2011.
Jon must be a Republican. You Think? Jon if you really want to keep that “chain of custody” thing going, just look at what you wrote – THERE WILL BE A POLING PLACE IN EACH WARD.
One thing Jonathan forgot to point out is that public voting, especially as practiced in the US, is the greatest “civility institute” ever created. It’s amazing that we can regularly go out to vote and that there is no major threat of violence or intimidation, especially given the high level of emotion that often attends political differences. There are exceptions, of course, such as the Jim Crow South, or if a citizen currently lives in a neighborhood where the Black Panthers show up to “volunteer.” But all-in-all, our elections are a nationwide “teachable moment” as pertains to the democratic process and civil society. We risk losing that sense of community and shared values (though we differ in political views) if mail-in voting replaces doing so in the public square.
TT is right, voting at the poll, in person, is one of those times when folks with all sorts of political leanings can come together in peace. In this regarding TT makes nothing out of the first person to comment and their idea that having a single polling spot in each ward will help make this, as TT says, a “teachable moment.” ONE single polling location means only 6 in the entire city.
Wow TT and Dan! So you two don’t vote by mail? So you two go to the polls at a City of Tucson election? So you two don’t vote early or by mail in even numbered year elections? So you two opposed the creation by the Republican controlled legislature for the permanent early voting list? So you two opposed the changes to the laws to allow more people to vote early? So you two opposed the recent change in state law to consolidate polling places in even numbered year elections?
The facts, in Tucson there are six Wards with 244 precincts and with the vote, 60 voting places or ten per Ward, which isn’t true.
Since the permanent early voting list, the number of registered voters has signed up has increased more than two-thirds, from 62,000 in 2009 to more than 106,000 presently, representing close to half the total registered voters in the City, Democratic, Republican and even Hoffman’s Libertarian party.
Since the changes in the early voting laws done by the Arizona Legislature, more than 60% of votes cast their ballots in this manner and that number is growing.
The political parties and candidates encourage people to vote early and to sign up for the permanent early voting list.
There was no back room deal, nothing nefarious done on this. It was to deal solely with the process. Hoffman’s statements about otherwise are ludicrous, especially about the charter. The Council can vote to put something on the ballot, what the Council did was about how to ensure registered voters get their ballot, nothing more, nothing less.
As it was reported at the Mayor and Council, the Town Clerks of Oro Valley and Sahuarita, have had no reported cases of voter fraud with their vote by mail elections and they have had them since 2002 and 2003.
Ten other cities in Maricopa County use the vote by mail process. The biggest city Phoenix, will be using a hybrid process, with 25 polling places, and with more than twice the precincts than Tucson, do the math.
Enough with the whining and remembering. Ask a young person if they vote and so, how. The answer will be by mail. Voting has evolved over the age of this country and will continue to do so. The most important thing is to get people to exercise their franchise, the ballot, by casting it.
Note to uofarain… Early voting is not the same as requiring most voters to vote by mail.