On Election Day, we Arizonans will not only be choosing among the many candidates running for office; we’ll also be voting up or down on as many as 10 ballot measures. While some are as boring as determining for whom to vote for mining inspector, many are profoundly important and will affect our lives directly for years to come. Vote “yes” on these.
• Proposition 106, the Arizona Health Insurance Reform Amendment. A “yes” vote would bar any Arizonan from being forced into any health-care plan, and it would secure the right of any Arizonan to purchase medical care on a fee-for-service basis. The addition of this amendment to the Arizona Constitution will present a challenge to recently passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the federal health-care package) which will force people to purchase approved insurance products. So, now the “commerce clause” not only allows the federal government to control everything we do, but it will control us absolutely. Even if you like the federal legislation, a vote for this ballot prop will allow the legal issues to be resolved in court.
• Proposition 107, the Arizona Civil Rights Amendment. A “yes” vote would end discrimination based on race, sex and ethnicity in government at all levels. It is important to understand that “affirmative-action” programs, which will be eliminated under the law, are not “equal-opportunity programs.” In fact, they are quite contradictory. The ugly assumption is that some people, by virtue of their race, are inferior to others and are not capable of competing on an equal footing. If you believe that to be true, just do not ask the government to be involved.
• Proposition 113, Arizona Save Our Secret Ballot Amendment. A “yes” vote would require secret ballots for public offices and referenda, and designations of employee representation. This is a nationwide movement inspired by the looming federal legislation known as “card check,” which would allow employees to fill out a card to be collected instead of a secret ballot. The purpose of “card check” is to make it easier for unions to organize workers. I am certain that it will make it easier—particularly among employees who do not want union representation. Clearly, the idea is to enable intimidation and cheating by labor unions. Clint Bolick of the Goldwater Institute makes the point: “‘We feel that the secret ballot is absolutely necessary in order to ensure that workers are not intimidated into voting for a union they might not otherwise choose.’ So wrote Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) and 15 colleagues in a 2001 letter to the Mexican government. Why then is Miller sponsoring legislation, now the Orwellian-named Employee Free Choice Act, that would eliminate the secret ballot for authorizing union representation in this country?”
• Proposition 203, Arizona Medical Marijuana Act. A “yes” vote would allow Arizonans suffering from certain diseases to use a small amount of marijuana, medicinally, without fear of arrest and prosecution. It is ironic that the federal government classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug (morphine, cocaine and methamphetamine are Schedule II), virtually preventing medical research, then justifies the classification by saying that there is no medical application. So, we are left with measures such as Prop 203 to allow medical use. The bottom line is whether your mind and body belongs to you or to the government.
• Proposition 302, Arizona First Things First Program Repeal. A “yes” vote would repeal the First Things First program, which is an early-childhood-services program, and put its $324 million into the general fund. The money would then be used for “health and human services for children.” I will not bother with the argument that parents, not the government, should be raising children. This program did pass as a referendum, so the people do not agree with me. It is strange, however, that this middle-class benefit is funded primarily by taxing lower-income working people through a tobacco tax. This is part two of a plan to balance the budget, the first being the recently passed one-cent sales-tax increase. If Prop 302 fails, the Legislature will cut other child services, some of which might actually help poor children.
This is a fine time to remind everyone that the opinions above are those of the author, and not the Tucson Weekly.
This article appears in Oct 21-27, 2010.
It is good that the Tucson Weekly presents a number of viewpoints on current issues. While I agree with the author explicitly on one proposition (203) I disagree to varying degrees on the rest.
I am in particular disagreement with the author’s justification for a Yes vote on 107. The simple fact of the matter is that there still is such a thing as white privilege. At this point in American history “equal opportunity” means that the privileged (and mostly white) educated elite have the opportunity to continue holding positions of power and wealth while the poor unprivileged (mostly non-white) masses retain the opportunity to work in low paid, labor intensive, and intellectually void jobs. The opportunities of today are not equal. It is still true that best thing you can do for your children’s future is to make sure that they’re born white, male, and upper middle class. This is a sad state of affairs that we must recognize and work to change. Affirmative Action programs were instituted in recognition of this fact and our society is not ready to do away with them yet. I will be voting No on proposition 107 because I believe in “Equal Opportunity” and recognize that we’re not there yet.
Zack, what a CROCK! I was ready to cast my ballot until I realized you disagreed, to varying degrees. Now I have to rethink EVERYTHING.
You are welcome to your opinion. Keep it to yourself, you ignorant fool.
This author has it completely wrong about • Proposition 113, Arizona Save Our Secret Ballot Amendment. What he does not understand is that the secret ballot idea is strictly to give employers time and leisure to threaten and cajole workers OUT of having a union. The card check doesn’t intimidate anybody, it’s over in a minute, the deed is done, and if a majority of workers want a union, they have it.
On the other hand, having to wait for the NLRB to arrange a secret ballot allows the employers time to intimidate, threaten, and harass workers into voting against the union. Why do employers support this particular secret ballot? Because employers do not want workers to unite and ask for fair treatment as a group. Employers love the idea of the so-called ‘secret ballot’ because they emphatically don’t want workers to have a voice in how they are treated at work.
W Corvi, you ignorant slut; the definition of an ‘opinion’ is a though shared. You can’t welcome him and then unwelcome him. The paper is an opinion piece, not a secret. Unless of course Boegle deletes your comment in which case the comment turns into a secret to add to the many secrets the Editor likes to keep.
Thought, not though in the first sentence.
All the Hoffmans are confusing. Wasn’t there a failed legislature candidate named Hoffman and is this the same Hoffman on Inside Track?