State Sen. Vince Leach: “It is unfortunate that Pima County is taking actions that are not consistent with the state.”

The Pima County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 along party lines this week to update health code regulations for restaurants and bars to reduce transmission of COVID-19, but three state lawmakers are asking the Arizona Attorney Generalโ€™s Office to step in and force the county to rescind the rules.

State Sen. Vince Leach and state Reps. Mark Finchem and Bret Roberts say that the county is exceeding its authority in creating the regulations and have asked Attorney General Mark Brnovich for an investigation.

“We’ve seen throughout this crisis how important it is to balance health concerns with the need to reopen businesses and get Arizonans back to work,” Leach said in a prepared statement. “Gov. Ducey and the Legislature have been working with experts to find that balance and determine the best course of action for the entire state. It is unfortunate that Pima County is taking actions that are not consistent with the state. The cumbersome regulations in its proclamation will not facilitate an easy reopening for businesses.”

Members of the countyโ€™s Back to Business Bars and Restaurants Task Force said that while they helped create guidelines and best practices, they didnโ€™t think their recommendations would become regulations with fines attached.

โ€œWe offered to help be a part of this from the very beginning and now weโ€™re the ones being targeted with fines,โ€ said Ray Flores, owner of El Charro and its related restaurants. โ€œIf itโ€™s really about public health and human safety, then all businesses should have to go through this. This is not a restaurant problem, this is a human population problem.โ€

Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry said the goal of the task force “is to help the business community get back to business, not hinder it.”

Huckelberry said the county had heard mixed reaction from the public since enacting the new regulations earlier this week.

“We have received considerable feedback from some businesses and the public that the adopted measures donโ€™t go far enough, that theyโ€™re too liberal and should be more restrictive while the pandemic is ongoing,” Huckelberry said. “We have also heard from some businesses and some members of the public that they go too far, are impractical, or that we should let individual businesses decide whatโ€™s safe for their business operations during a pandemic. We appreciate all of this feedback and will be making amendments to the minimum public health safety standards as necessary to continue to strike the balance of protecting public health and getting people back to work in a safe manner during a pandemic.” (See Huckelberry’s full comment at the bottom of this article.)

The task force, which was composed of eight restaurant and bar owners as well as five county health department staff members, was organized late April with the job of crafting guidelines and best practices for bars and restaurants in the county. Among the recommendations: wellness and symptom checks; cloth masks and gloves to be worn by all staff; patrons exhibiting signs of COVID-19 are not permitted on premises; and no more than 10 diners allowed per table, as well as no bar-top seating.

Flores said not only it was disappointing to see such a highly regulated industry such as food service now being threatened with fines, but restaurateurs were being expected to act as pseudo-healthcare workers with no training and very little guidance on how to proceed.

โ€œNobody in the restaurant business wants to make anyone sick,โ€ Flores said. โ€œ At the same time, nobody in the restaurant business is a healthcare professional.โ€

One of the main regulations concerning task force members and restaurateurs alike is the requirement to take wellness/symptom checks of โ€œall restaurant employees, vendors, contractors, third party delivery service workers as they arrive on-premises and before the opening of a restaurant.โ€

Dan Bogert, COO of the Arizona Restaurant Association and a task force member, said he doesnโ€™t disagree with temperature checks for restaurant employees. However, checking third-party delivery drivers can pose potential problems for restaurant operators, said Bogert.

โ€œOur main concern on some of the things they put forward are mainly safety-related and liability-related,โ€ Bogert said. โ€œWhen youโ€™re talking about doing temperature checks of people that arenโ€™t your employees…we have no structure around temping a contractor or a third-party delivery driver.โ€

Sean Humphrey, co-owner of John Henry’s Cocktail Bar and a task force member, took issue with the โ€œNo Bar-Top Seatingโ€ rule for bars, even though the county is allowing parties of 10 or fewer in restaurants. He said he sees no difference between 10 people sitting around a table or across a bar.

โ€œI donโ€™t know where exactly they came up with the number of 10 per table. If 10 people are sitting next to each other at the table, how is that somehow safer people being spaced out every other stool at a bar?โ€ Humphrey said. โ€œThis is not a one-size-fits-all kind of thing.โ€

Other requirements concerning task force members and restaurateurs are supplying staff with cloth masks and hand sanitizer when they are in short supply these days and the Pima County Health Department doesnโ€™t have any to share with reopening businesses.

Josh Jacobsen, owner of three southside Lucky Wishbone restaurants and ARA board member, said he sat in on a few calls with the task force. Developing new regulations for enforcement was never the goal, Jacobsen said. Developing best practices for the service industry was.

โ€œWhen they changed them from recommendations to regulations, I think that came out of left-field for a lot of people,โ€ Jacobsen said. โ€œI think the recommendations are in the right direction for what we should all strive for. But when they turned them into regulations that are completely unattainable in some cases, it puts restaurants at such a disadvantage.โ€

Dr. Bob England, director of the Pima County Health Department, clarified how the county health department would enforce the new guidelines approved by the Pima County Board of Supervisors in his video public health update on May 14.

“We are not going to have people sitting in the bushes while you eat,” England said. “If there’s one thing I’ve learned about our registered sanitarians and others in the year I’ve been here, it’s that they want to help businesses do the right thing.”

Education and assistance will be the health department’s focus while the new regulations are in place, England said. The regulations will stay in place until the pandemic is declared over by Pima County’s chief medical officer, Dr. Francisco Garcia.

“Actual enforcement of any kind is going to be a last resort,” Dr. England said. “We want all of us to continue to do what we know we should to prevent transmission in this disease.”

The Pima County Board of Supervisors also adopted a set of temporary regulations to help restaurant owners in unincorporated Pima County expand their outside dining area while under new indoor occupancy restrictions during Wednesday’s emergency meeting. Parking spaces, sidewalks and vacant lots could be used as additional seating upon approval from Pima County Development Services to ensure the areas are cleared for dining service. County officials said they are planning on providing same-day review and evaluation of temporary outdoor expansion requests in an attempt to help restaurants reach full capacityโ€”or as close as possibleโ€”as quickly as possible.

UPDATE: Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry has responded to restaurateur concerns and the legislators’ request for an Attorney General investigation:

Pima Countyโ€™s Back To Business (PCB2B) effort has brought together more than 120 members of the business and faith community and teamed them with County and regional public health experts to craft a plan for safely reopening businesses and other public venues in Pima County during the COVID-19 pandemic, which is ongoing.

The goal of this effort is to assure the public that it is safe to resume dining, recreating, exercising and lodging in Pima County because the County, through its statutory duty to protect the public health, has established, in cooperation with the business community, a set of minimum standards that will help protect workers and the public from the transmission of COVID-19.

The goal is to help the business community get back to business, not hinder it. However, with that in mind, this has been a fast-moving process, and since the Board of Supervisors, via Proclamation, adopted these initial standards on May 13, we have received considerable feedback from some businesses and the public that the adopted measures donโ€™t go far enough, that theyโ€™re too liberal and should be more restrictive while the pandemic is ongoing. We have also heard from some businesses and some members of the public that they go too far, are impractical, or that we should let individual businesses decide whatโ€™s safe for their business operations during a pandemic.

We appreciate all of this feedback and will be making amendments to the minimum public health safety standards as necessary to continue to strike the balance of protecting public health and getting people back to work in a safe manner during a pandemic.

I share the Boardโ€™s concern for the public health of the entire community and will, therefore, be asking the Board of Supervisors at its meeting of Tuesday, May 19, to consider at least three clarifying amendments:

โ€ข That drive-thru and counter service restaurants are not required to have call-ahead or reservation systems. This was never our intent, but recognize the adopted protective measures were unclear on this point. We will ask the Board to make it clear.

โ€ข That restaurant staff should not have to try to determine if a prospective patron is ill with COVID-19. Instead we will ask restaurants to install posters at their entrances stating that anyone with COVID-19-like symptoms should not enter. The symptoms will be spelled out on the poster.

โ€ข And we will ask the Board to rescind the civil penalty and instead ask that if inspectors find restaurants who are not complying with all of the protective measures that such will be posted to the Countyโ€™s website similar to the results of normal health inspection reports for all restaurants.

As for the complaint filed by members of Legislative District 11 with the Attorney General, Pima County has vetted all of the adopted minimum public health safety standards with the County Attorney and believe that these standards fall well within the Countyโ€™s statutory requirement to protect the public health.”

15 replies on “GOP State Lawmakers Seek To Overturn Pima County’s Emergency Rules on Restaurants, Other Biz”

  1. Board has not been reading the news. These types of rules have change strong blue areas into red areas. Look at California, and the Democrat loses. These types of rules has cause the Democrat to loses. Board keep doing this and the board will turn full red and Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry, will be looking for a new job. These rules will give Trump a Pima County win.

  2. > Look at California, and the Democrat loses.

    That was a single district which was only recently flipped in 2018. And, it largely had to do with local anger over the scandal that enveloped the Democratic congressperson who won in 2018. You’re broadening the cause way too much to fit the agenda of the Republican Death Cult.

  3. I am so sick of this hyper-partisan, political based, sh@t show that is foisted on us 24/7 through all means of mass media as a reflection of who we are as a people.

    What is most disheartening is that we continue to see politicians — with clear political agendas — using the fear this pandemic has created to further their political goals, regardless of the very real risks to lives, livelihoods and the security of this nation.

    If this madness is allowed to continue unchecked — as it is now, soon people will look at traffic Stop signs as attempts by an over-reaching government to curb personal freedoms and gleefully blow through them as a demonstration of liberty and freedom and deride those that obey them as snowflakes and sheepole worthy of only contempt for their compliance and cowardice.

    Get a grip. Scientists and medical professionals are trying to save our lives, but we ignore their advice and rebel like spoiled children, sulking in our rooms convinced that everyone else is having more fun than we are, or sneaking out in defiance to show them you’re not the boss of me.

    I am not red. I am not blue. I am an American who’s life experiences are both unique and shared. I will not be neatly categorized by the media or politicians and pitted against my fellow Americans as a statistic to further some intellectual or political agenda.

    Cease and desist with your polls, your political wonks, your boutique news programs and your attention-seeking, headline-making politicians. I can and will make up my own mind, but rest assured, I will not put my fellow Americans at risk through my actions or inactions, and I will never place their value on an economic scale to be weighed against gold.

  4. Good for them…I hope this is happening in other states also. The “rules and regulations” are ridiculous and unnecessary and for the most part expensive and undoable. Let the people decide what businesses and restaurants they want to support. Get gov. out of them!

  5. The problem is always legislators who basically know nothing, like this bunch, constantly thinking they always know better than local governments. Let us allow all the Pima County local taskforces the chance to work on the practical aspects of this complicated sitation, and come to reasonable solutions. With state legislators like Finchem and Leach constantly sticking their micro noses into local issues, nothing will work out well.

  6. False news: England was never more than an interim director and his successor has been named. Facts matter, Hunnicut wannabe.

  7. Apparently amongst this group here it’s ok to hate old people and white people. Nobody responded to the first poster.

  8. young black I asked a question why are republican elected officials old white. Ever see a picture of republican congressional delegation?

  9. Hey hey! Yet nnother example that perfectly illustrates the hypocricy of the Republican party’s supposed “principles” that prioritizes local control over an over-reaching government.

  10. I’m an old white guy, but I’m disgusted with all the old white guys in the Republican Party that care only about how to make a buck. This old white idiot in the picture might change his mind when he gets to the age where he needs a nursing home.

  11. ybguy I judge the republican party for what it is RACIST! trading abraham lincoln for strom thurmond and nixons southern strategy. j.d. watts got tired of being the republican house negro when he quit.

  12. Just do the right thing that’s best for the citizens of Arizona – Pima County etc. Who cares if they are white, pink or orange? I don’t.

Comments are closed.