Several months ago, Ricky Hidalgo was standing outside with his young
son when a couple of local gang members decided to have some fun.
Driving an old Chevy pickup truck tricked out with chrome rims, they
peeled out of a nearby alley, guns pointed in the air.

“They came out shooting and unloaded their guns,” Hidalgo said. “I
grabbed my son and turned my back to the shooters.”

The car spun its tires at the end of the next block, then turned and
drove slowly back, past his house. “They acted like nothing happened,”
he said. “I looked at them, and they just mad-dogged me—stared me
down.”

Hidalgo recalled the event on a recent evening while sitting in his
front yard with his mother and two uncles. He’s 27, and has lived in
the same tidy, one-story brick house on the corner of Seventh Avenue
and 33rd Street, in the heart of South Tucson, for much of his
life.

Back in the 1990s, when he was a teenager, the neighborhood was even
worse than it is now—overrun with crack houses and prostitutes,
with drive-by shootings and brawls. Just sitting out on the front porch
was unwise.

“You couldn’t really come outside like we are right now, have a
little barbecue and carne asada, whatever, because guys would just come
and mad-dog you, stare at you, like, ‘What are you doing out here?'” he
said.

About 10 years ago, though, things started to change. Police cleared
out the crack houses and drove off the prostitutes. The neighborhood
took a turn for the better. Families could enjoy fresh air on a
Saturday night.

Now Hidalgo sees those gains slipping away.

“It’s getting worse again,” he said.

While Hidalgo’s neighborhood may be entering a downward spiral, it’s
not a problem he can take up with Tucson Mayor Bob Walkup, or any other
Tucson City Council member. The Tucson Police Department won’t be much
help, either.

South Tucson is a city within a city, an independently governed town
of about 5,700 people embedded in the heart of the southside, just a
mile from downtown Tucson. It collects taxes and elects its own mayor
and City Council; its public works and sanitation departments fix the
potholes and pick up the trash; its fire department puts out the
occasional blaze. It even has a court and a judge.

This setup works OK on a day-to-day basis, residents say, but
there’s one major problem: When it comes to keeping the peace, the
South Tucson Police Department is basically on its own. In the heart of
the violence-plagued southside, that can be a tall order to fill.

The U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Community Oriented
Policing Services, which provides grants for police agencies to hire
additional officers, recently ranked the South Tucson Police Department
as the most troubled police department in Arizona, out of the 82
departments that applied for federal assistance in 2008-2009. The
program’s ratings system measures crime rates and municipal
finances.

“It’s the highest combination of crime and poor fiscal health that
exists out of all the applicants in the state,” said Gilbert Moore, a
spokesman with the Department of Justice.

Cops in South Tucson are paid far less than their counterparts in
the Tucson Police Department. Cops starting out in South Tucson earn
around $31,000 per year, while TPD officers just out of the academy
earn $45,500. Higher-ranking officers earn even less; a sergeant with
TPD can earn between $74,131 and $77,854, while sergeants with South
Tucson earn about $40,000 per year. However, the crime South Tucson
officers face is no less serious. Just this August, for instance, two
men—one armed with an SKS assault rifle—forced their way
into a motel room in South Tucson. When an officer arrived on the
scene, alone, the armed men drove their sports-utility vehicle straight
at him, forcing him to shoot the driver multiple times, seriously
injuring him.

“It’s high-intensity here, for sure. We recognize it,” said South
Tucson City Manager Enrique Serna.

To many locals, South Tucson is defined by far more than its crime
rates. To Brian Flagg, who has lived there for more than 25 years, the
city has a tight-knit sense of community that sets it apart from other
low-income areas in the Tucson metro area.

Flagg lives and works at Casa Maria, a low-slung adobe house on East
26th Street that serves food to nearly 1,000 local people in need every
day. As head honcho at Casa Maria, Flagg makes all of $10 a
week—part of the vow of poverty he took back when he was in his
early 20s. Many of those he serves are immigrants from Mexico.

“All in all, I’m positive about living in South Tucson,” Flagg said
recently, sitting on a tattered couch in the dim suite of rooms where
he’s lived for 23 years. “To me, it’s the closest thing to living on
the other side. It’s got a whole different atmosphere about it. It’s
less uptight.”

South Tucson can feel like a world apart from much of the rest of
Tucson. About 80 percent of the population is Latino, with the
remaining fifth divided about evenly between whites and American
Indians. (Tucson, by comparison, is 70 percent white.) Mexican heritage
runs deep, and for years, the city’s signature public event was its
annual Norteño Music Festival, a showcase of the
accordion-driven popular music of northern Mexico. Spanish is commonly
spoken as a first (and sometimes only) language.

South Sixth Avenue, the city’s main artery, is not much to see; it’s
a gritty commercial strip of auto-body shops and used-car lots,
bodegas, liquor stores and payday lenders, with a few weed-choked empty
lots and vacant storefronts here and there.

South Fourth Avenue, however, is the real heart of South Tucson.
Quiet and low-key, it feels almost like a small-town main street, with
a south-of-the-border vibe. It’s also where to find some of the best
Sonoran-style Mexican restaurants in all of Arizona.

As for the residential streets, a few blocks are tree-lined, with
historic, well-maintained adobe homes. Others are rundown, with
ramshackle buildings and dilapidated houses. Where residential streets
intersect with South Sixth Avenue, drug dealers and prostitutes mingle,
even at midday.

High crime has been an issue for decades, and South Tucson’s
rough-and-tumble reputation was already well-established when Flagg
moved here in the early 1980s. It didn’t bother him much at
first—his aim was to lift up the poor, not stomp out crime. But
by the time 1997 rolled around, crime was impossible to ignore, even to
a latter-day St. Francis with a mellow disposition and a California
surfer’s drawl.

“It really, really, really looked shitty here,” said Flagg, now 54.
“You couldn’t walk 10 steps up or down South Sixth Avenue without
somebody trying to sell you crack or a prostitute propositioning
you.”

A succession of grisly murders in 1996 and 1997 gave residents a
sense of being under siege. An 11-year-old boy was gunned down in a
drive-by while celebrating his birthday. A father of young children
found a stabbing victim dead in his yard one morning. A young man was
shot dead in a convenience-store parking lot on a Sunday afternoon. A
torched car was discovered in an empty lot with a bullet-riddled body
in the driver’s seat.

At the end of 1997, the year the violence peaked, the police tallied
the damage: 4 murders. 14 rapes. 180 aggravated assaults. 91 robberies.
225 burglaries. 123 stolen cars. For South Tucson—population
5,753 in 1995—it was the equivalent of one serious crime for
every 20 residents.

Out on the streets, Flagg tried to rally locals behind an
affordable-housing initiative. But all anyone wanted to talk about was
crime. So he and his friends at Casa Maria kicked off a grassroots
movement to curb the violence.

“I never wanted to be a crime-fighter in my whole life,” Flagg said.
“But hell’s bells, that’s what the people wanted.”

Flagg and his allies focused their attention on the South Tucson
Police Department. Cops at the small agency, they found, were among the
worst-paid in the state, though they worked in what amounted to one of
the most dangerous neighborhoods. Perpetually underfunded, the
department’s image was that of an understaffed, poorly trained,
ill-equipped and ineffective force, a place where young cops spent a
few years getting experience before jumping ship to better-paying
jobs.

The meltdown of 1997 finally upended the status quo. By the end of
the year, the grassroots movement started at Casa Maria lit a fire
under city and county officials, and in a series of packed church
meetings, elected leaders pledged to deliver the resources to curb
crime.

A charismatic and experienced new police chief was recruited to lead
the force. Cops got raises, and staffing reached its highest levels in
years. A federal grant was secured to support community policing. Gang
members were pursued and prosecuted with the help of a state task
force. Police raided dozens of drug houses, and in some cases,
bulldozed them to the ground.

The result was a renaissance in the tiny city. Crime dropped by half
in just three years. A new shopping center opened, anchored by a Food
City supermarket, bringing in thousands of dollars in new tax revenue.
In 1999, President Bill Clinton even dropped by Mexican restaurant Mi
Nidito. South Tucson was a “city on the mend” with a “surging” economy,
the Tucson Citizen reported in February 2000.

“South Tucson is a model of inner-city redevelopment,” then-city
manager Rene Gastelum told the paper.

Declaring victory and achieving it are entirely separate things.

In the nearly 10 years since the opening of the shopping center,
South Tucson has seen little, if any, business growth. The city budget
is back on life support after years of falling revenues. A corruption
scandal has darkened the Police Department’s reputation. And as crime
creeps toward its highest levels in years, the Police Department budget
has been pared to the bone.

“This place has gone to hell in a handbasket,” said one veteran cop,
who requested anonymity because he still serves on the force. “They’ve
squeezed the life out of us. It’s terrible.”

Sixto Molina, the police chief credited with orchestrating the
dramatic drop in crime, left in the summer of 2007, after clashing with
city leaders over funding. His replacement oversaw a rapid downsizing
of the force. Experienced cops have retired or left for other jobs.
Now, some of those who remain fear the department has become
dangerously dysfunctional.

“If we have a major incident in South Tucson, we don’t have the
resources to deal with it,” said Sgt. Dan Snyder, a South Tucson cop
for 19 years and the president of the police officer’s union. “It’s
systemic failure.”

Events over the past year have taken the situation from bad to
worse.

In May 2008, armed federal agents swarmed South Tucson’s City Hall
and Police Department, seizing documents and copying computer files. It
was the climax of a months-long investigation of Lt. Richard Garcia,
second in command, who confessed to stealing $460,000 from the evidence
room and the city’s anti-racketeering accounts. Garcia told
investigators he had blown the money on gambling sprees, booze and
strippers.

As residents reeled from the news, they were hit by another blow:
The city was running a deficit of $850,000, in a general-fund budget of
less than $5 million. The deficits triggered deep cuts in staffing and
services.

To make matters worse, one of South Tucson’s top cops now says city
management is misappropriating tens of thousands of dollars in state
and federal antiracketeering funds, money generated from cash, property
and other assets seized during police activity.

It is a charge that South Tucson has faced before. In 1994, an
investigation by the state Attorney General’s Office found that city
officials knowingly diverted anti-racketeering money into the city’s
general fund and spent it on salaries and basic operating expenses.
Legally, the funds must be used to supplement law-enforcement
activity.

According to Snyder, they are at it again. As South Tucson’s
task-force agent for the Drug Enforcement Agency, Snyder directly
oversees the department’s asset-seizure program.

“The city visualizes this as a slush fund,” he said. “All of the
money that was supposedly budgeted for the Police Department was
redirected for other things.”

An examination of the South Tucson budget shows that the city has
virtually emptied its anti-racketeering accounts to pay for basic
expenses like fuel, vehicle repairs and office supplies. As recently as
2007, the city paid for these items largely out of its general fund.
Using the anti-racketeering funds to pay for basic Police Department
expenses frees the city to spend general-fund money elsewhere, Snyder
said.

“That’s not how it’s supposed to work,” he said.

Ruben Villa, the city’s finance director, defended the use of the
anti-racketeering money, also known as RICO funds. He explained that
South Tucson is now so broke that it can no longer afford to pay for
basics such as fuel for patrol cars or vehicle repairs out of the
general fund. Under the circumstances, he said, the expenditures are
perfectly legal.

“That is why the RICO fund is so important for the operation,
because it supplements what we don’t have,” said Villa. “It allows us
to spend money from an allowable source on those items we simply can’t
afford.”

Yet according to Grant Woods, who served as Arizona’s attorney
general from 1991 to 1999, South Tucson’s use of the funds might amount
to a violation of state or federal law.

“It’s not supposed to be used for the general operating budget of a
department,” Woods said of the anti-racketeering funds. “You use this
in very specific areas, rather than just throw it into the pot.”

Given the allegations coming from within the Police Department, an
investigation by the Arizona auditor general might be in order, Woods
added.

“If that appearance is there, then it’s very appropriate for the
auditor general to go into an agency like that and do a full-scale
audit and produce a report to the state detailing exactly where
everything has been spent, and how and why, and what reforms are
necessary,” he said.

Tom Rankin, deputy county attorney for the Pima County Attorney’s
Office, oversees South Tucson’s anti-racketeering fund expenditures. He
said that South Tucson’s use of anti-racketeering funds to pay for
basic Police Department expenses appeared to fall into a legal gray
area. Police Department heads, he said, need to take up the issue with
South Tucson’s political leaders.

“Forfeiture monies … are meant to be a supplement to, not a
substitute for, the monies that the government authorities ought to be
giving the Police Department to do their basic job,” Rankin said.

While the city and the Police Department clash over funding, the
situation on the streets is deteriorating. In virtually every category
but rape and murder, crime has risen sharply. Robberies increased 185
percent from 2003 to 2008. Burglaries in 2008 were double their level
in 2002. And aggravated assaults—there were 127 last
year—are approaching their highest level in a decade.

As a result, South Tucson’s jail bill now averages about $22,000 per
month, up 220 percent since 2002. The city owes at least $500,000 to
Pima County for prisoner detainment, a debt city leaders have said it
won’t be able to pay for years.

Police responsiveness has slipped. Carlos Salaz, 65, a newly elected
South Tucson City Councilman, has heard complaints from residents that
calls to police have simply been ignored. According to one constituent,
police failed to respond to a report of shots fired during an argument
in a shopping-center parking lot.

“When you have a situation where there’s gunfire, and they don’t
respond … what the hell?” Salaz said. “Where’s the safety at?”

Mayor Jennifer Eckstrom did not return repeated phone calls from the
Tucson Weekly.

The city’s current state of affairs is a case of history repeating.
The city has faced budget crises and allegations of fiscal
mismanagement, self-dealing, nepotism, voter fraud, incompetence and
corruption over the years. In the 1980s, it nearly disintegrated under
the weight of its debts.

The city, however, continually clings to independence—for
reasons that perhaps only history can explain.

South Tucson was first incorporated in 1936, but the area’s origins
go back even further, to a time when it was simply known as Barrio
Libre.

Barrio Libre was one of the original barrios, or free neighborhoods,
that formed on the outskirts of central Tucson more than 200 years ago.
Beyond the reach of military or civil authority, the barrios were rough
and lawless. Barrio Libre, the southernmost, was remembered as the
rowdiest of them all.

As Tucson grew, it annexed the barrios—all but Barrio Libre,
which migrated farther south, always a step beyond the city limits and
the reach of the law.

By the 1930s, Tucson had a population of about 35,000 and was
entering a period of rapid growth. In 1936, it attempted to annex
Barrio Libre—and the move was met with resistance. Fearful of the
higher taxes that annexation would bring, a group of property owners
south of 22nd Street started a drive to incorporate the dusty barrio as
an independent city. Out of 87 ballots cast, 52 chose
independence—and Barrio Libre was reborn as South Tucson.

The city of Tucson was not amused. It viewed its rowdy neighbor to
the south as an annoyance and an impediment to growth, and tried
repeatedly to annex the city over the ensuing years. Finally, in the
1950s, it accomplished what must have seemed like the next best thing:
a series of annexations to completely surround South Tucson.

Those annexations created the boundaries of South Tucson that for
the most part persist today: 25th Street to the north, the Union
Pacific Railroad tracks to the east, 40th Street and Benson Highway to
the south, and 12th Avenue to the west. Altogether, it’s a little more
than one square mile.

The little city prospered at first, as old State Route 89—now
South Sixth Avenue—developed into Tucson’s original motel row.
Dirt roads were paved over, and hundreds of new homes were built. The
population swelled to around 6,500.

The completion of Interstate 10 in the mid-1950s halted the golden
age. Visitors steered to the north and south, destroying the tourist
economy. Restaurants and shops closed, and seedy bars and hot-sheet
motels took their place. As the decades passed, the area became known
as open-air market for drugs and prostitutes. Its lawless history was
kept alive by Barrio Libre South Tucson, a powerful street gang with
origins in the 1920s.

As the 1980s came to a close, the city finally seemed to turn a
corner. It had a powerful new ally in Pima County Supervisor Dan
Eckstrom, a South Tucson native son, former mayor and longtime City
Council member who helped steer county, state and federal dollars to
the city. Millions were spent on a new library, street improvements and
municipal facilities.

By the summer of 1993, though, South Tucson was back on the rocks.
In a space of five months, the chief of police and city manager were
both fired. That winter, the city announced it had underestimated its
budget deficit by nearly $500,000. To conserve money, police services
were slashed.

In July 1994, South Tucson officials were cleared of criminal
charges in an investigation of the city’s use of anti-racketeering
dollars. Investigators slammed the city, however, for knowingly
misusing the funds by steering them away from the Police Department and
into the city’s coffers.

A month later, four top officers resigned, including acting police
chief Richard Vidaurri. “I’m tired of our predicament,” Vidaurri told a
reporter from the Arizona Daily Star. “It’s very frustrating to
me when I can’t provide for the officers in the field because of no
funding.”

To hear some cops tell it, the same thing is happening all over
again.

South Tucson is falling apart,” said Armando Teyechea, a sergeant who
retired last May after 12 years on the force.

Staffing has dropped to just 16 commissioned officers, down from 27
in 2004, and 29 a few years earlier. But the city continues to
struggle. In January, pay for all city employees, including police
officers, was slashed. For some veteran cops, who already earn far less
than their peers in the Tucson Police Department, the cuts amounted to
more than $10,000 apiece. Picking up some of the slack are a half-dozen
reserve officers, who are paid $15 per hour and receive no health
coverage, life insurance or other benefits.

The revelation last summer that former second-in-command Garcia had
embezzled nearly a half-million dollars from the department further
demoralized the force. Garcia, a 13-year veteran, was sentenced to
three years in federal prison for the thefts this April.

Chief Sharon Hayes-Martinez, who took over after the departure of
Sixto Molina in late 2007, repeatedly declined to answer questions sent
by e-mail from the Tucson Weekly concerning her leadership or
her role in the Garcia scandal. However, in a 2008 interview with the
Tucson Citizen, she denied any knowledge of Garcia’s gambling
and alcohol problems during the time she acted as his direct
supervisor.

Serna, who appointed Hayes-Martinez chief in 2007, defended her
performance as Garcia’s supervisor during the time of his thefts.
“There wasn’t any reason to believe that things weren’t being managed
well,” he said.

Last month, Hayes-Martinez announced her resignation as chief. In an
interview with the Arizona Daily Star, she said she would
continue to serve on the force as a reserve officer.

South Tucson remains under severe pressure to rein in expenses, a
state of affairs that could worsen if the recession is lengthy.

“We’re hurting. We’re hurting in terms of resources,” said Serna.
“The people that are still here are holding fast and are doing a great
job.”

Serna expressed hope that a new ordinance passed by the City Council
recently would help to curb crime. About 60 percent of South Tucson’s
population lives in rental properties, and the ordinance would allow
the city to take action against absentee landlords whose tenants are
involved in drugs, prostitution and other crimes.

“We’ve got landlords, quite frankly, who turn a blind eye to who
they rent to,” said Serna. “Focusing on that is going to make a hell of
a difference.”

What South Tucson may need even more than a new ordinance is a
workable strategy for economic development. According to finance
director Villa, revenues were flat or declining long before the recent
downturn.

“In terms of seeing new development, that hasn’t happened,” Villa
said. “We have not seen businesses knocking on anyone’s door in South
Tucson. We have had to ride the tide, if you will.”

With few prospects for new tax revenues on the horizon, South
Tucson’s best hope for boosting public safety spending lies in state
and federal grants. But a recent federal grant application that sought
funding for up to seven new officer positions yielded funds for only
one.

In the meantime, neighborhoods continue to struggle with a rising
tide of street crime. This August, a young man was shot multiple times
and seriously injured while walking with friends down South Fourth
Avenue.

Ricky Hidalgo lives only a few blocks from where the shooting took
place. A few months earlier, he and his wife had taken their young son
outside to play, only to find a prostitute standing on the corner
across the street.

“In front of my house, in front of my kids, just waiting,” he
said.

A few days later, the same woman returned, working a different
corner. This time, she found a customer, a man in a white pickup
truck.

“They’re coming back, the prostitutes,” Hidalgo said. “It’s starting
to go back to the same way it was.”

7 replies on “Falling Apart”

  1. What is really amazing is the almost complete lack of coverage by the mainstream media over what is happening in the City of South Tucson. Thank you, Tucson Weekly, for shining some light on this terrible situation. This square mile incorporated “city” is still a part of our community and the plight of its residents — and the corruption of its political leadership — should no longer be ignored. But I can certainly understand why “Mayor Eckstrom” is always unavailable for comment.

  2. Mayor Eckstrom is unavailable to everyone even the citizens and businesses of South Tucson. The Eckstrom machine needs to be removed from politics.

  3. I just moved into South Tucson. We’ve almost always lived in “poor” neighborhoods, often in the barrios. However, stories like this cover up the fact that these things happen in a lot of neighborhoods–even those within Tucson’s own city limits. In our old neighborhood, our daughter was harassed by four wannabe gangsters, who actually shoved her to the ground and started kicking her. Four males attacking one 16-year-old girl. She didn’t want to do anything about it because she was afraid of retaliation.

    Am I worried about my kids living in South Tucson? Sure. I was also worried about them living in the vicinity of Reid Park. I was worried about them living near Kolb and Tanque Verde. I was worried about them living in the vicinity of Sunnyside High. I was worried about them living in the vicinity of the Blenman Neighborhood. (In that neighborhood, we had the police helicopters overhead at least once a week.) In short, there is nowhere in this city where I have not worried about my kids. What I will say, though, is that I have felt as welcomed by my neighbors in South Tucson as I have anywhere else–perhaps even moreso. That’s the strength of South Tucson–the people.

  4. Whats makes me FURIOUS is that Armando Teyechea plays “good cop” in this article.

    Probably the biggest media cover-up in STPD history is when Armando Teyechea and another cop beat and nearly killed a 9 year old girl after using a taser on her.

    How do you think I found this article 2 years later? I was actually a witness and I’m looking for any shred of evidence left that this actually happened. I stumbled upon a report of this incident a few years back and am in desperate need of it now.

Comments are closed.