Gov. Doug Ducey says he is against the Common Core standards, but isn’t asking the state Board of Education to get rid of them, yet. Instead, Ducey proposed a thorough review of the language arts and math standards to search for ways they can be more Arizona and less federal government.

The involvement of parents, students and teachers from around the state are a must.

“We can learn from others, but at the end of the day the standards need to come from Arizona and they need to help us achieve our objectives,” Ducey told the board this morning. “And in any instance during your review, you find situations where Arizona standards can outperform the ones already adopted, I ask you to replace them.”

Last week, the last surviving anti-Common Core bill in the state Legislature got the OK from a Senate committee. The legislation asks to dismantle the standards, go back to the ones we had in place five years ago, and wait for a new committee and the education board to start from scratch. 

What I got from Ducey’s remarks is that it’s acceptable to use Common Core as a launching platform—taking the parts that would benefit Arizona and dump the parts that wouldn’t.

Ducey also wanted to share his “vision” for the state’s K-12 education (no mention of slashing JTEDs budget by $30 million, though). Here’s his statement to the board:

First is choice. Parents and children need quality choices so that they can choose the education that’s best for them. We are fortunate to live in a state where we have already moved significantly down that path. In Arizona, we have many more choices in education than parents elsewhere in the nation.

Public schools, private schools, religious schools, charter schools, online schools, and homeschooling all give our families choices that aren’t available in many other states. This is a critical element of educational success, and I ask this Board to continue these achievements and – if anything – to accelerate the pace of reforms that give more choices to more families.

Second is excellence. That’s not a word we use enough when talking about our state’s K-12 education system, even though we have three of the ten best schools in the country – Basis Scottsdale, Basis Tucson North and University High School. So we know how to do it. We just need to do it more frequently and more widely.

Despite these successes, we know we are below the mark in relation to other states in student achievement, particularly in reading and math. And our own measurements of success do not provide us the real picture.

For example, when you compare what Arizona reports as proficiency in 8th-grade reading and math vs. what the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) tells us, that part is a little discouraging.

Arizona tells our citizens that 70% of our 8th graders are proficient in reading, when according to NAEP only 28% of our 8th graders are proficient at reading, 6% lower than the national average. That’s an astounding difference.
Also, we believe our 8th-grade proficiency in math is 59% of kids; NAEP says it’s 31%, 3% lower than the national average. The disparity is smaller, but still way too large.
But there are two major problems with the data:

First, Arizona’s scores are too low – unacceptably low.
Second, we’re giving false assurance to too many parents that their kids are well prepared for college and for life, when in fact they’re not.
So we need to commit ourselves to achieving excellence. And when we see excellence, we should understand who and what creates it and export those best practices to other schools so that they can benefit from it.

This Board – along with my office and the Legislature – needs to design policies that get Arizona on a path to significant improvement in the quality of education. It won’t happen overnight, and it’s a long-term proposition, but it can be done and we need to make that our primary focus.

The third word that I want to emphasize is accountability. It is a word that is vastly under-utilized when it comes to education, and I want this Board to know that it’s a word I take very seriously. We need to set the example by also being accountable. And in doing so, we will create a culture that flows through the education chain to governing boards…to superintendents…to principals….to teachers…to parents …and ultimately to the students themselves.

Where we see mediocrity we should call it for what it is – and demand that the people responsible for that school – from the elected governing board members to the superintendent to the principal and to the teachers – up their game and make meaningful improvements. And if they can’t summon the will to do it, then they should step aside and let someone else take charge who can.

Where we see failure, we can’t sit idly by and do nothing. It’s not the children’s fault that they are locked in a failing school, but our kids are the ones who pay the price for the failure of the adults around them to provide the environment where they can learn. We have a moral obligation to give our kids the best we’ve got.

The fourth word I want to emphasize is results. As you know I come from the world of business, where people are measured by results. Government is a different world, where process seems to be a higher priority and results often take a back seat. We’ve just gone through our state’s budget process, and discussions about education where all about funding.

Between federal, state, and local dollars Arizona is spending approximately $10 billion dollars to educate one million students in our K-12 schools. Now it’s time to focus on how we best use the resources we have. I would far prefer the focus to be “are the kids learning” by looking at outcomes and “are the kids graduating” by looking at our graduation rates. Our children would be far better served by focusing on the answers to those questions than that ones we often find ourselves debating at the state Capitol.

During the budget process, I also highlighted my “Classrooms First” Initiative that emphasized spending money in the classroom rather than on bureaucracy and administration. That focus will be a permanent feature of my administration. We are spending too much money in the wrong places, and not enough in the classroom where it really matters. I ask for this Board’s help in maintaining focus on classroom spending and ensuring that school districts have their priorities right when they’re spending taxpayer money.

The final word I want to emphasize is everyone. All the words I’ve used so far – choice, excellence, accountability, and results – don’t work if they don’t apply to all children in all corners of our state. It shouldn’t matter what your zip code is – if you’re a child in Arizona you deserve our absolute best. We’ve accepted that public education is a key responsibility of the state, and we need to ensure the benefits of our actions apply to all.

I was born and raised in Guatemala City, Guatemala. I moved to Tucson about 10 years ago. Since I was old enough to enjoy reading, I developed an interest in writing, and telling stories through different...

8 replies on “Doug Ducey: Board of Education Should Review Common Core, Not Kill It…Yet”

  1. Ducey says: “…excellence. That’s not a word we use enough when talking about our state’s K-12 education system, even though we have three of the ten best schools in the country – Basis Scottsdale, Basis Tucson North and University High School. So we know how to do it. We just need to do it more frequently and more widely.[…] And when we see excellence, we should understand who and what creates it and export those best practices to other schools so that they can benefit from it.”

    So does Ducey propose to make all our public schools selective? As David Safier has pointed out, Basis and UHS’s test scores and rankings can be explained in large part by the special populations they manage to enroll. They cannot and should not be compared to (or ranked together with) schools that serve the full range of needs in the population:

    http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archives/2014/04/23/basis-and-university-high-are-top-us-high-schools-which-means

    Here, as elsewhere, Ducey shows that he is not close enough to (or knowledgeable enough about) our schools to say anything meaningful about education. His words are just that: words. They bear no relationship to the reality of what is going on in our schools or to what changes would make our schools better for the students they need to serve. Students in Arizona include many who need the social safety nets our legislature continues to shred, and for these kids Ducey and his crew are actively undermining any remaining hope we might have had that they will be given the supports they need to “perform” in school. Creating more schools that exclude students who can’t “cut it,” (the Basis and UHS model) certainly won’t help these kids.

    He concludes his remarks to the State Board of Education with: “The final word I want to emphasize is everyone. All the words I’ve used so far – choice, excellence, accountability, and results – don’t work if they don’t apply to all children in all corners of our state.” That’s right, Ducey. Now do your homework and figure out that actually serving “everyone” WON’T allow you to “export” what happens at Basis and UHS — and WILL require you to undo some of the damage you’ve done to our social service and education budgets.

  2. More, more, more schools of choice, but given a family of three, each unique needing a different charter, parents would have to quit their jobs to get everyone where they need to be. Am I the only family with this problem? What happened to the community school, where kids knew their neighbors?

  3. It’s interesting that while Ducey rails against the Common Core standards because they are “national”, he cites NAEP, a test paid for by the federal government, to prove that AZ students are performing poorly. Presumably NAEP is based on some set of national standards. So he accepts national standards as part of the test, but not as the basis for the learning curriculum to help students do better on the national test? Ducey is demonstrating a completely incoherent philosophy driven entirely by Tea Party politics.

  4. I just read this and I read ‘.. replace them…’ I do not agree with Jim’s analysis that Common Core is to be the launch pad….

  5. It’s all rhetoric. He doesn’t know a damn thing except what is fed to him by the Goldwater bunch. How about looking at actual research to find out what works. There is no data over the last 20 years that shows all this “choice” improves learning? Sure BASIS is great if every kid can be selected by the school and you can weed out poor performers. BASIS also constantly pressures parents for “donations” for lunch funds, or for “teacher improvement funds”, that will not be accounted for to the parents. How about funding school 100%, including JTEDs, just once. Never has happened. There is no accountability by the legislature or governor to fund inflation. Public school districts, teachers, and kids bust their butts to improve, and all they do is get kicked by the legislature, the vast majority who know nothing about what happens day to day in local school districts. So, Doug, it all rhetoric.

  6. Seems like a pretty cogent and fact based analysis that will no doubt make the people benefitting from the status quo uncomfortable. I like the emphasis of students over institutions. The classic Blue State model emphasizes ” protecting public schools” while the students fall below standards. The key Blue State metric seems to be ” 40/99″… 40% of students read at grade level while 99% of teachers get rated satisfactory or better. Lets hope AZ doesn’t fall into that trap
    Also agree that the bigger the budget doesn’t mean the better the results. Places like Washington DC and Philadelphia spend more per student than some top private schools. And still have poor results…. usually because most money goes outside the classroom.
    The biggest challenge with this approach is the need for parental involvement. If you encourage choices, someone has to choose on behalf of the student. Some parents don’t want to get involved.

Comments are closed.