In the last year, there’s been a lot of news about campus rape. Colleges generally didn’t know what to do with themselves as students protested leniency with attackers and accused rapists defended their honor. This week, the  U.S. Department of Education is saying they had better figure it out.

Because of increased attention and organizations like Know Your IX—a very cool organization that helps students deal with sexual assault at their colleges—there’s been a lot of pressure to get things right.

Yesterday was a big day in the direction of progress. The U.S. Department of Education announced it had found Harvard University and its Law School had fallen short in its campus sexual assault responsibilities. The ruling means that Harvard will have to redo it’s sexual harassment policies. 

From yesterday’s U.S. Department of Education press release

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced today that it has entered into a resolution agreement with Harvard University and its Law School after finding the Law School in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 for its response to sexual harassment, including sexual assault.

“I am very pleased to bring to close one of our longest-running sexual violence investigations, and I congratulate Harvard Law School for now committing to comply with Title IX and immediately implement steps to provide a safe learning environment for its students,” said Catherine E. Lhamon, assistant secretary for civil rights. “This agreement is a credit to the strong leadership of Harvard President Drew Faust and Law School Dean Martha Minow, for which I am deeply grateful and from which I know their students will benefit significantly.”

Following its investigation, OCR determined that the Law School’s current and prior sexual harassment policies and procedures failed to comply with Title IX’s requirements for prompt and equitable response to complaints of sexual harassment and sexual assault. The Law School also did not appropriately respond to two student complaints of sexual assault. In one instance, the Law School took over a year to make its final determination and the complainant was not allowed to participate in this extended appeal process, which ultimately resulted in the reversal of the initial decision to dismiss the accused student and dismissal of the complainant’s complaint.

During the course of OCR’s investigation, the Law School adopted revised procedures that use the “preponderance of the evidence” standard for its sexual harassment investigations and afford appeal rights to both parties, in compliance with Title IX. The Law School also complied with the Title IX requirements relating to the designation of a Title IX Coordinator and publication of its non-discrimination notice.

The Law School has committed to take further specific steps to ensure that it responds to student complaints of sexual harassment and sexual violence promptly and equitably. As part of its monitoring of the agreement, OCR will review and approve all of the policies and procedures to be used by the Law School, including the Law School’s use of the new University-wide sexual harassment policies and procedures adopted for this academic year. The changes relating to the University-wide policies and procedures will be published in supplemental guidance and will affect all of the University’s schools as they, like the Law School, decide how to implement the new University-wide policies and procedures.

Under the terms of the agreement, the Law School must:

  • Revise all applicable sexual harassment policies and procedures to comply with Title IX and provide clear notice of which policy and procedure applies to Law School complaints;
  • Through its Title IX Coordinator, coordinate provision of appropriate interim steps to provide for the safety of the complainant and campus community during an investigation;
  • Share information between the Harvard University Police Department and the University and notify complainants of their right to file a Title IX complaint with the Law School as well as to pursue the criminal process in cases of sexual assault or other sexual violence;
  • Notify students and employees about the Law School’s Title IX coordinators and their contact information;
  • Train staff and provide information sessions for students on the policies and procedures applicable to Law School complaints;
  • Conduct annual climate assessments to assess whether the steps and measures being taken by the Law School are effective and to inform future proactive steps to be taken by Law School;
  • Review any complaints of sexual harassment filed during the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school years to carefully scrutinize whether the Law School investigated the complaints consistent with Title IX and provide any additional remedies necessary for the complainants; and
  • Track and submit for OCR’s review information on all sexual harassment/violence complaints and reports of sexual harassment/violence filed during the course of the monitoring and responsive action taken by the Law School.

The agreement announced today relating to the Law School does not resolve a still-pending Title IX investigation of Harvard College and its response to sexual harassment, including sexual assault, of undergraduate students.

Bookworm, cat lady, journalism enthusiast.

5 replies on “Department of Education tells Harvard to Protect Students from Sexual Assault”

  1. Re: “The ruling means that Harvard will have to redo it’s sexual harassment policies.”

    The “redo,” most likely will be further erosion of due process, meaning more men will taken to task and punished on flimsier and flimsier accusations.

    There is not one chance in a billion billion that the new policy, solely designed to help Democrats win the war for women’s votes, will try to prevent sexual harassment this way:

    “The Sexual Harassment Quagmire: How To Dig Out” http://malemattersusa.wordpress.com/2011/1…

    It’s a detailed look at what I think is the sexes’ most alienating and destructive behavioral difference, which is responsible for much of what is called sexual assault of women.

    Such wars on men are largely why the Democrats lost so severely in the November mid-terms.

    “Republicans don’t have near as big a woman problem as Democrats have a man problem.” http://online.wsj.com/articles/kim-strasse…

    “Among likely voters, women divide evenly between Democratic and Republican House candidates, while men favor the Republicans by 16 points.” –http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/…

    “What Does President Obama Mean For Men?” http://malemattersusa.wordpress.com/2012/1…

    “Who needs a ‘War on Women’ when there is already a war on men?” http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/11/04…

  2. It would seem that the Hook Up era is coming to an end. Built on the notion that men and women were pretty much emotionally equal and that sexual encounters were mostly for erotic fulfillment, those assumptions are changing. Now it seems that that men and women view sex differently ( men… its fun, women it is part of a relationship) . If the two participants aren’t on the same wavelength, then we seem to get these ridiculous Obama-style bureaucratic edicts. It is surprising that the gov’t thinks that elite Harvard grad and undergrad students are too stupid to figure it out for themselves.
    It would seem that the answer would be ” Back to The Future”…. the reinstitution of single sex classes and coordinate colleges ( remember Radcliffe, Pembroke, and Barnard ?). Boys and girls can be together during day time but need to go to ” neutral corners” once the sun goes down. It would protect women from the supposed sexual predators and men from getting a rap sheet along with a diploma while in college.

  3. What are you two on about? This is about rape and sexual assault, not casual consensual sex or gender in the two party system. If you think this is a war against men then I feel bad for you.

  4. All this means is that Harvard is the most recent university to cave into DOE blackmail and succumb to the witch-hunt mentality of the “rape culture” advocates.

    Fortunately, men are beginning to fight back against this deprivation of constitutional due process rights and suing the colleges that expel them or unfairly label them as “rapists”, thereby destroying not only their reputations but also any conceivable chance for success in life.

    For an in-depth expose of the evolution of universities from institutions of higher learning into witch-hunt tribunals for the “rape culture” advocates, see: New Puritanism – New Paternalism: The “Rape Culture” Narrative Demeans Women, Demonizes Men, and Turns Universities into Witch Hunt Tribunals http://riversong.wordpress.com/new-puritanism-new-paternalism/

  5. stalecloud thinks this is about “rape and sexual assault”, which the latest DOJ study found to occur at a strikingly low 0.61% rate on campus (hardly the 1-in-5 statistic that the advocates bandy about, but which has no scientific basis).

    It is about an alcohol-fueled hookup culture in which consent is almost always vague, ambiguous or changing and in which “buyer’s remorse” or next-morning regrets turns a forgettable event into a “rape” that ruins lives.

Comments are closed.