The ethics report into Rep. Daniel Patterson also includes a handy little timeline of Patterson’s problems with his coworkers, starting in his freshman year.
2009
Rep. Patterson engaged in harassing and inappropriate actions towards lobbyists, which was reported to Democratic leadership.
2010
Patterson had an aggressive, inappropriate, and unprofessional exchange with Rep. David Gowan.
He impugned former Senator Russell Pearce (see the video here) during a committee meeting, and was subsequently removed from the committee.
2011
Patterson had aggressive, inappropriate and unprofessional exchanges with:
– Lobbyists and other Representatives during and after a committee hearing
– Reps Steve Farley and Lynne Pancrazi during closed Democratic Caucus (screaming denunciations at Pancrazi, and pushing Farley)
– Rep Eddie Farnsworth on the House floor
– Sen. Frank Antenori at the back of House floor
Patterson also made untruthful representations to Rep. Bruce Wheeler to get his support on Patterson’s bill, glared at him during a committee meeting, and then followed Wheeler to his office and instigated a heated discussion “wherein Rep. Patterson’s face became flushed and contorted and he raised his voice in an effort to intimidate Rep Wheeler.”
2012
Patterson had aggressive, inappropriate, and unprofessional exchanges with:
– Rep. Amanda Reeve, in both a committee hearing and on the House floor
– Rep. Jerry Weiers, (puffing out his chest in the House hallways and calling Weiers an “asshole” and a “prick”) Patterson later acknowledged in writing that it was inappropriate.
– Patterson also impugned Rep Frank Pratt and invaded Rep. Amanda Reeve’s personal space in an attempt to intimidate her
He was untruthful to Rep. Wheeler regarding domestic violence charges and what police reports of the alleged incidents would show and was charged with multiple misdemeanors in Tucson Municipal Court.
Finally, he was removed from all committee assignments.
More from the report, courtesy of TW intern David Mendez, below the cut:
Patterson’s feelings toward Pinal Sheriff Paul Babeu: “A legislative staff member even recalled Rep. Patterson calling Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu – a homosexual – that ‘fag.'”
Patterson’s reputation with staffers: “Legislative staff members with whom we spoke describe Rep. Patterson as a person who ‘does not care about anyone around him,’ is ‘a double personality type person,’ ‘in his own world,’ ‘creepy,’ ‘out of control,’ unable to control his temper, and who is making his fellow Democratic House Members ‘look like they are crazy.'”
House policies instituted because of Patterson: “We were told that another special House policy necessitated by Rep. Patterson’s conduct is that no legislative staff members are allowed to meet with Rep. Patterson alone.”
Patterson’s “Little Danny”: “A staff member recalls Rep. Patterson discussing his vasectomy and explaining his sexual performance, notwithstanding the procedure, as being ‘just fine.'”
Patterson’s love for his alma mater: “A legislative staff member described Rep. Patterson having sent correspondence to the head coach of the Michigan State University men’s basketball team. This correspondence . . . sought free sports memorabilia.” (From the footnotes: “That correspondence did not indicate that Rep. Patterson would be willing to pay for any memorabilia received. It appears, however, that Rep. Patterson’s plea was successful, having received a Michigan State University basketball personally autographed by [Tom] Izzo that, at one time during this investigation, was viewed on Rep. Patterson’s desk in the House chamber.”)
This article appears in Mar 29 – Apr 4, 2012.

Pretty tough to impugn Russell Pearce, so you kinda gotta hand it to him there.
to be fair the title should read: ” Democrat Daniel Patterson, Terrible Co-Worker”, I know if he was a republican it would be in the title.
He is creepy…and I’m a democrat.
@Chris Nelson: We didn’t refer to Lori Klein as a Republican in the headline when she did something insane and stupid, did we? http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archi…
Plus, he’s not a Democrat anymore, so that wouldn’t exactly be fair.
You got that right, if he was a REPUBLICAN -this rag and all the others would be hollering it to high heaven. Double standards are just fine if youre in the media…
Daniel Patterson’s aggresive behavior goes way back. In the Spring of 2004, Daniel R. Patterson was convicted of aggravated assault in Pima County, Arizona.
GuiseppeKnows: If we were such partisan hacks, wouldn’t we just sweep this story under the rug? This is the strangest argument I’ve heard in awhile. I can’t speak for anyone else, but my personal bias is against legislators doing a terrible job. Patterson falls in that category and believe it or not, a bunch of Republicans do as well.
I guess I don’t understand. How has this obvious “jerk” survived until now. It seems such action should have been taken years ago.
The guy is a schmuck……a democrat schmuck……love it……
Maybe Hollywood should come calling and make a buddy flick starring Patterson & Antenori. “Frankendan! Two abusive peas in a pod”
@Dan Gibson: I don’t think it’s a strange argument, or at least I’m seeing it with dreary regularity. Republicans (especially the less moderate/Tea Party types) have a HUGE persecution complex. It’s what leads to their incessant whining about a) the liberal media b) attacks on Christianity and c) attacks on straight white males, all of which they do in apparent utter seriousness, all years and years of historical evidence to the contrary.
Please unearth a similar hostility record for Antenori. He and Patterson, separated at birth perhaps?
@jamvee This “jerk” and a host of others survive because their constituents elect them, and in many cases *continue* to elect them — at least that portion of their constituents that vote. One hopes that any voter chooses candidates based on their research and the extent to which a candidate’s values reflect their own. Heaven help us that there’s apparently enough apathy in barrio viejo, of all places, and its surroundings to let that happen in Patterson’s case, because it’s possible the only explanation for his election is that those folks sat this election out.
Daniel Patterson was acquitted of all the charges against him. As for the other matter, he had to work with politicians and lobbyists all day. It would take the patience of a saint not to lose one’s composure occasionally with such people. This was a stupid witch hunt. Patterson was probably the only honest man in that legislature, and that’s why they got rid of him.
–Kevin Walsh
Phoenix AZ