At a recent social gathering, I found myself seated near a rather stern-looking woman. She was a friend, of a friend, of a friend, the far end of a social Markov Chain, meaning that she and I would have absolutely no reason to interact otherwise. I said, “Hello,” in a way that made it clear that I hate being at things like this but I don’t want to be the sourest one in the place. After a noticeable pause, she said “Are you the one who makes his living writing those terrible things about charter schools (in the Tucson Weekly)?”
Realizing that this had almost zero chance of going well, I gave it one last shot. “Well, I certainly don’t earn my entire living writing (this column). I also write for other publications and I coach, I’m on the radio sometimes, and I do a bunch of other stuff. My wife says that I have 10 mini-jobs that add up to a half-a-career.”
(That line usually gets a laugh, or at least a smile, but she just glared at me like that school administrator, Mrs. Hogarth, that John Candy went to see in “Uncle Buck.”)
You know how, in the movies, couples who have been married for a while have this cutesy way of communicating non-verbally? Well, my wife, Ana, and I have been married 37 years and we still haven’t mastered that. I kept trying to get Ana’s attention, but she was always turned away in such a manner as to prevent eye contact. Now that I think about it, that probably is her way of communicating non-verbally.
If the woman had read my columns, she had to know where I stand. Personally, I don’t think that the words “profit” and “education” should ever be used in the same sentence. If somebody’s trying to make a profit, they’ll do all they can to maximize that profit. And how exactly will they do that when it comes to charter schools? Either by shortchanging the students or by shortchanging the teachers, which ends up shortchanging the students.
Then, I think there should be a special broom closet in Hell for the fake-ass Washington liberals (the Michelle Rhees and Arne Duncans of the world) who have bought into this nonsense. They try to spin it as being progressive-ish, when it’s as far from that as can be.
But mostly, I hate the Arizona legislators who have done all they can to ruin public education in Arizona simply because they hate teachers and they hate unions and they hate teachers’ unions.
(Plus, charter schools often have really stupid, pretentious-sounding names like The Arizona Prep Academy for Intellectual Excellence and Other Good Stuff.)
She said, “Have you ever even been to BASIS?”
I replied, “No, because I already know how to take standardized tests.”
She told me that her son, while only a sophomore, has already taken and passed three AP exams. I said, “That’s like telling me that your homeschooled kid has perfect attendance. It’s not that hard.”
Believe it or not, it degenerated from there. I told her she certainly had the right to send her kid(s) wherever she wants and then I wished her well.
Not long ago, I did some research and found some interesting things. There’s a carefully hidden website that discloses what schools and districts pay for things like Classroom Instruction, Administration, and Student Support Systems. (By law, these things have to be made public, but whoever designed this particular website probably got his/her start working on the sets of Terry Gilliam’s “Brazil.”)
Real public schools spend a lot of money on Support Services, prompting tax harpies to scream about not enough money getting into the classroom. But these services include everything from school buses to counseling to the (often very-expensive) apparatus for dealing with special-needs kids. It is certainly our public responsibility to offer an education to all students, regardless of the added cost involved.
By law, charter schools are also supposed to accept and educate special-needs kids, but they almost never do. Some charter schools claim that they do, but they’re usually lying about it when they make that claim.
And who’s going to rat them out? The Legislature that gave them the keys to the store and told them to steal whatever they want? Not likely. How about the self-proclaimed tax guardian angels at the Hypocrite Society (also known as the Goldwater Institute)? That’s even less likely, seeing as how bigwigs at Goldwater cry crocodile tears about misspent taxpayer funds when it comes to policemen and firefighters, but then turn around and dip their canteens in the endless pool of charter-school money as “board members” at BASIS and other charters.
There are a lot of stunning revelations in the data provided on the website, so I’m going to have to save it for next week. I don’t want it to be a boring, repetitive recitation of numbers, so maybe I’ll put it in the form of a Broadway show tune.
I’ll give you a little taste of what’s coming (in quiz form). Of all the schools and school districts in Pima County, can you guess which one spends the most taxpayer money on “administration?” I’ll give you a hint. That same school spends exactly zero dollars (and zero cents) on student support services.
This article appears in Oct 22-28, 2015.

As much as I hate the Republican legislature, on this topic they’re far more open-minded than Danehy (which is saying less than nothing).
There are lots of great not-for-profit charter schools and lots of great homeschooled kids. And public schools are not completely horrible, but their fundamental design is flawed. Forcing every child into that extremely narrow institutional model is good?
Hate is an awful strong word for an outed liberal. His definition of “maximizing profit” sounds exactly like what is happening at TUSD.
We have met the enemy…..and it is me?
Agreed with all you have said and will say on this issue! At least someone out there is willing to step up and say what needs to be said.
The unstated assertion here is that low-paid teachers are poor teachers. I suspect there is an argument the other direction. Is it not verifiable that the highest paid teachers, nationally, are in the least effective districts?
I always thought charter schools were invented so certain children would not have to go to school with other certain children. When there was segregation there were no charter schools. Once integration of public schools started charter schools started popping up.
If you agree that Charter schools need more financial transparency and scrutiny, then you agree that public schools need more financial transparency and scrutiny.
They both receive public funds. They both need to be held accountable. Both don’t pay teachers well, but Board members and Administrators are making money hand over fist.
They each have different line items to skim from taxpayers.
You hit the nail on the head OPV. They assume if they make the charters the bad guy, they can continue and even expand what they get away with.
Old trick weedhopper. We no fall for it.
This is Danehy at his best.
I’d hate to see him at his worst !!
Hmmmm.. I’m super liberal and do not see charter schools as opposed to liberalism. For fairness sake I must confess that my child went to public TUSD school up to college where it became private. But ONLY because his IQ was sufficient to be in TUSD gate schools into University High. So he is privileged with a superior education and opportunities because of IQ score ?! I would have never sent to neighborhood schools. Needed advanced full time GATE… Thank God it exists but couldn’t pass it now. The truth is charters offer alternatives to the non-elite to potentially get a better education because they can specialize. The answer seems to be diversify PUBLIC education into specialty learning environments… which they tried but didn’t work because they also still served neighborhood students whom were not really interested in the specialty programs and decreased the effectiveness there of… Meanwhile schools sold and closed instead of here’s our Fine Art campus …here’s our science/math campus, this school more disciplined , this one project based etc… That’s why charters are doing well…Liberalism is freedom of speech and thought and learning styles and environment and choice not just for the rich and privileged and top one percent of IQ….TUSD, legislature and traditional non-out of the box thinking allowed charter school to thrive and fill a niche… Basis is a great school (not just testing) but it takes a certain kind kid to thrive there. And another kid needs a more creative environment…. Diversify and stay purely public can be done …
Excellent job! As a retired public school teacher this article is spot on. It’s based on facts and it feels refreshing to see the truth about our schools in print.
Charter schools are like privatized prisons only privatized schools…