It’s been more than three weeks since the end of the World Cup. I’m not going to hate on it. It was pretty exciting, except for, you know, most of the games. Like the majority of American sports fans, I find the period between the end of the NBA playoffs and the start of football season to be a bleak time, indeed. The World Cup was a spectacle and I enjoyed it. Besides, if my only viewing choices are between two countries playing soccer on a world stage and a baseball game pitting the Arizona Diamondbacks against the San Diego Padres, I’m like “Yay, Cameroon!”

A few observations:

• Having caught the first-half scoring explosion in the Germany-Brazil semifinal game, I anxiously watched most of Argentina-Netherlands game the next day. Except for the shootout at the end (which, quite boorishly, appeals to my American sense of “Can we please have a winner sometime today … please?”), the 0-0 game was like having a root canal performed rectally.

• On Oct. 13, it will be three months since the end of the World Cup. I am going to ask 100 random people these three questions:

What’s the only country that the U.S. beat in the World Cup?

Other than goalkeeper Tim Howard, name a player on the U.S. team.

What country knocked the U.S. out of the World Cup?

What percentage of respondents will get all three correct? I’m guessing it will be in the 0 to 1 percent range. I’ll even give you a reminder. The answer to the last question is Belgium. And no, Tea Party morons, Belgium is not the same as The Netherlands. Holland is The Netherlands, which is why they call the people who live there Dutch.

• The magazine The Week runs a contest on its back page every issue. A couple weeks ago, it noted that the World Cup championship game was watched by about one-fifth the number of Americans who watched this year’s Super Bowl game. It then asked, “Describe how you would change soccer’s rules to make the game more appealing to Americans.”

The winner was “Shorten it by 89 minutes,” followed by “Substitutes may enter driving monster trucks,” and “More biting.”

The real answers should have been “Add more refs and use instant replay to kick people out of the game for flopping and faking injuries.” Soccer will never be taken seriously by Americans until they get rid of that nonsense. It’s really embarrassing.

• They kept talking about how Argentina is the “most European” of South American countries. That just means that of all the Nazis and Fascisti the Vatican helped smuggle out of Europe, most ended up in Buenos Aires.

• Much has been made of the World Cup TV ratings in the United States, which were quite impressive, especially compared to previous Cups. However, it was like a perfect storm for the TV outlets. Rio de Janeiro is only one hour ahead of the East Coast of the U.S., so the times were friendly. There was an unprecedented saturation, with games shown on ABC, ESPN and Univision. Plus, the U.S. team didn’t totally stink out loud (although the American squad did go a yucky 0-2-1 in its last three games).

Unfortunately, the TV folks are probably going to have to wait at least 12 years for the numbers to be that good again. Moscow is 11 hours ahead of Tucson (or 13 hours behind plus one day, if you want to get that International Date Line Brain Freeze). Doha, Qatar (the mega-controversial 2022 site) is 10 hours ahead of Tucson. That means games starting at 4:00 or 5:00 in the morning, our time. Plus, Qatar, which has average daytime temperatures in the 110 degree range, is talking about moving the Cup to December, where it will compete for TV viewers against American football, college and professional. Good luck with that.

• Despite all the wishin’ and hopin’ (God, I still love Dusty Springfield!) by socceristas, the World Cup really is indeed just like the Olympics for Americans. Comes around every four years, has some big moments, then quickly fades into the background. Nice summer diversion, but that’s it.

• The announcers kept talking about how the U.S. team has to adopt some other country’s style. Why? Remember in the original “Rollerball” how each corporate city-state had its own style of playing the game? Why can’t Americans come up with their own unique style—athletic, creative, non-flopping … fun?

• If Vladimir Putin is still running things in Moscow in 2018, the World Cup in Russia will be the 21st century version of the Hitler Olympics.

• My daughter’s engineering firm (she doesn’t own it; she’s just the best engineer in the place) has a team in a co-ed indoor soccer league on Saturdays at the Tucson Indoor Sports Center. There are a few guys in the league who are very, very good at soccer. Unfortunately for them, at this place and time, on the Cool Meter, that’s the equivalent of being able to cook varmint over an open fire.

• Oh yeah, I won a World Cup pool. According to ESPN (which runs the pools), I was in the 98.9 percentile in the country, which is funny, because I usually tend to over-think things when I try pools that involve real football.

It’s pretty hard to over-think soccer.

10 replies on “Danehy”

  1. Make soccer sensible? Easy. Get rid of the goalie. What stupid game designer would allow a basketball player to stand under the basket and bat balls away? Wouldn’t it be marvelous for football to have a player standing 2 feet from the goal line, running back and forth to tackle anyone who might come close. GET RID OF THE GOALIE. The surprising skill I watched for the first time was the ability to use your feet to control the ball … comparable to the skill of a remarkable basketball dribbler. But what good is that when you’ve got a guy standing open mouthed in front of the goal so your clever and carefully aimed shot is put down by a drone. Remove the goalie and you will have American soccer.

  2. chuckj…It’s not just the goalie, but as the opposing team gets close to the goal it seems that a number of players are allowed to gather in front of the goal as well. Frankly, I don’t know if thats not allowed but at times it seems like everybody on the field is in front of the goal.

    Beside…IT’S BORING AS ALL GET OUT…

  3. @fraser ~ Be sure to read next week’s column by Danehick … it will be more of the same incoherent, “ADD” blabbering (most likely about a high school girl basketball player… or a charter school …).

  4. I’ve learned so much from this hilarious piece, like: The scores of a soccer match are likely to be very low! Sometimes there’s no score at all!

    Also: Soccer is not so popular among spectators in the US of A! Sort of puts into perspective its popularity as the top youth sport among people who actually play as opposed to people who have some sports event on the TeeVee set while they munch junk food.

    Finally: Soccer is not cool! Tom Danehy, the decider on these matters, says so!

  5. Yet we will devote millions of dollars for more fields. The soccer parent lobby needs to be curtailed a bit. We cannot pay for road repairs but we have to kiss the ass of this kids sport.

  6. That’s what happens when you live in a City/County run by dead from the neck up morons. At least Tom is giving us a reprieve from his usual anti G.O.P./Tea Party rants.

  7. CW13,,,You seem to be an example of part of the dead from the neck up population that lives here.

  8. Sorry Timmy, but I’ve got bad news for you. I discovered that you and I have something in common. Seriously. I too, saw the band Faces twice back in the 70’s. Once at a 2 day outdoor festivel at the Pocono Speedway in Pa. and once at Madison Sq. Garden in N.Y.C. They were one of those bands that you’d probably forget if it wasn’t for their frontman, Rod Stewart. However, if you never saw them live you missed out on something great. Stewart and Ron Wood were an unbeatable one-two punch. It was amazing how they played off of each other. When Wood left for the Stones, Rod’s loss was Mick’s gain. At M.S.G. they closed the show with ” Stay with me ” Blew the roof of the place.

Comments are closed.