For the three in 10 current Arizonans who weren’t with us in the year 2000, please allow me to offer a brief lesson in the all-too-recent history of our state Legislature.

During a late-night conference committee meeting in April of that year, the speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, Jeff Groscost, managed to slip a 92-page (!) amendment into the Arizona Clean Air Act of 2000. The amendment called for the state to pay for half of the cost of the purchase of any vehicle that burned something other than gasoline. Or, if a driver wanted to convert his/her current vehicle to one that ran on alternative fuels, the state would pick up the entire cost of that conversion. But wait! If you were having trouble finding an alternative-fuel depot in town and wanted to install one on your property, the state would pick up the entire cost of that, as well.

The amendment was added at the very last minute in a 100-day legislative session that resulted in a gag response-inducing 1,400 bills, and the bill with Groscost’s amendment was passed and signed into law by Gov. Jane Dee Hull. (In her feeble defense, Hull saw 400 bills come across her desk in the final five days of the legislative session.)

Groscost, who, as we would later find out, fit nicely in the back pocket of the natural gas lobby, estimated the cost of the program to the state to be around $5 million per year, while other, Cassandra-like, folks thought that it might go as high as $10 million per year.

The law took effect in July 2000 and during the first three-plus months of its existence, more than 22,000 Arizonans filed applications for payments that averaged (by odd coincidence) nearly $22,000 each, for a cost to the state of nearly a half a billion dollars in a little more than one-fourth of a year. The cost of the alt-fuels mess had reached 7 percent of the entire state budget when Hull called a special session of the Legislature in October to put a one-year moratorium on the program.

Groscost unraveled pretty quickly after the $500,000,000 hit the fan. He first denied, then admitted, that he had either leased or purchased two vehicles from companies that engaged in converting cars from gas to alternative fuels. He followed that up by first denying, then admitting, that he was taking advantage of the bill’s tax incentives. Groscost represented perhaps the safest Republican district in the entire state, a chunk of the Mormon-est part of Mesa. Just a couple of weeks after the scandal came to light, he was defeated by Democrat Jay Blanchard, whose campaign strategy consisted of going out and standing on any street corner in Mesa and whispering, “I’m not Jeff Groscost.”

The disgraced legislator would later take a job with an alt-fuels company based in Mesa. He died, far too young (even for a scoundrel), from a heart attack at age 45, leaving behind a wife and six children.

There are several lessons to be learned from this fiasco. First off, a bill put together in the dark of night and pushed through a fatigued Legislature at the last minute is rarely in the best interest of the majority of Arizonans.

Second, even smart people who should have heard alarm bells going off can be duped. Many such people (including several in government) thought that new cars and trucks would be ineligible for the program due to federal regulations. However, what they didn’t know was that Groscost had held secret talks with the Environmental Protection Agency and had persuaded the feds to push back the scheduled cutoff date of June 2000 for the conversion of new vehicles to June 2002. The Governor’s Office would claim that it had been unaware of Groscost’s discussions with the EPA. His clandestine talks would turn the promised trickle into a tsunami.

Finally, I doubt that even Groscost knew the totality of what was coming. Clever people began buying big-ass SUVs and adding a 4-gallon propane tank to the flex-fuel vehicle. That way, they’d drive around using regular gas while the state would pick up half of the $40,000 price tag for the vehicle.

For the 1.3 million people who have become Arizonans in the past 14 years, let this serve as a warning. For the rest of us who were around at the time, we should certainly know better.

Please think about this the next time one of the voucher skanks opens his/her mouth to talk about the grotesquely misnamed “school choice” initiatives. (Just last week, the Arizona Senate passed a bill that probably would have cost Arizona taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars by paying some parents thousands of dollars to home-school a kid and giving other parents huge checks to help pay for private-school tuition for their kids. Somewhat miraculously, the House voted it down by a slim margin.)

The bill’s backer, Debbie Lesko, a Republican from Peoria, said with a straight face that the bill would actually save Arizona taxpayers money. Lesko and all of the others who do the bidding of the public school-hating Goldwater Institute—having the alt-fuels fiasco as a fresh example—are either liars or fools.

My money’s on both.

10 replies on “Danehy”

  1. Spot on. These were the same legislators that eliminated additional funding to public school districts for converting or creating charter schools. Ironically they used the alt-fuel argument to stop any new district charter schools and yank funds after 1 year for newly created ones. That group likes school choice as long as it is the choice they want you to make.

  2. Whoa, Tom. The voucher system does not cost the state money. It does what the legislature has clear authority to do, particularly when no NEW tax money is involved: control how revenue is spent. The thousands of dollars going to this program are simply transferred from the money wasting, bureaucratic, educationally weak public school system to an approach that has shown many signs of greater success. You’ll assert that the test scores don’t substantially differ. Study the tests and you’ll dismiss that. There’s really only one judgement about school success that matters. If the parent is pleased with the way the child is served, the school is a success. Period.

  3. Two words, Chuck J: Steve Yarbrough. Anyone who is still under the illusion that the voucher schemes are meant to benefit kids, families, or taxpayers need only look to Sen. Yarbrough and his years of legislative work on behalf of the “Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization” (aka his very own voucher-processing company).

  4. So what approach does the best job of preparing the next generation to take over the helm of the economic and political leadership of this state ? ( Real important given that the key assumption of a welfare state is that the next generation will pick up the tab). Seems like the advocates of the status quo are very vocal that they have the answer. But test scores argue that there is room for improvement …especially compared to the rest of the world ( where our kids will compete).
    Vouchers do add an element of competition to the mix. Here in Tucson, schools like Basis, which compete versus the public school monopoly seem to do an excellent job of preparing students for the 21st century. Maybe the public school monopoly could benefit from some competition.

  5. In the chicken and the egg scenario, TUSD sucks came first. Money sucking capitalists came second.

    You’d think your over priced bureaucrats, administrators and bloated union reps would have had this covered. They get paid all the same.

  6. Well, Danehick … it was nice knowing ya’!

    Can you say 10/13?

    Can you say, “bye-bye” to your Tucson Weekly gig?

    Given the recent acquisition of the Weekly by a cost cutting, “in-it-to-win-it” profit mongering media conglomerate, your “talents” are soon destined to be taken elsewhere (rhetorical question: Is there an alt-rag in South Florida in need of a left-wing hack who has a habit of reminding his readers how he grew up in the LA ghetto as the only white kid who never did drugs or took a drink of alcohol while still graduating with a degree as a math genius —- but yet still can’t figure out a cell phone???).

    Sadly, it looks like the $50 bucks a week you currently make from disseminating your genius at the Tucson Weekly will now go missing from your household budget … meaning you will have to totally rely upon your wife’s employment for your needs (including your wide selection of black t-shirts from Wal-Mart).

    Maybe Anal Franzi will take you back on his his weekly radio show? Let’s hope not, as I believe your true destiny is taking orders at any given McDonald’s. But please be realistic: With your credentials, you certainly will not qualify for their Assistant Manager training program.

    Well, I should say I am going to miss hammering you and your typically insidious opinions – but in all reality, I won’t.

    Good luck and good riddance.

    Signed,

    Danehick Sux

  7. egads…I take back all those negative comments about your judgments Tom. I see that Danehick Sux is taking the charge.

  8. Danehick Sux. Bravo. Bravo. Couldn’t have said it better myself. You may take my hard earned title of most hated right-winger around here.

  9. Hey, the Republicans allowed me to get a street legal golf cart absolutely free during the alt-fuels debacle and I thank the taxpayers for that, I’m still driving it. Although I benefitted frrom the Republican largesse, I’ll never vote for any of them

  10. Can any of you knuckleheads spell Solyndra? It doesn’t seem to bother you when lefties waste trillions. 500M to set up a failing ACA? Good Lord.

Comments are closed.