So, this pickup truck is rolling through a Tucson neighborhood when it hits a big pothole, and all but one of the would-be mayoral candidates go flying out. (We’ll assume that it’s in Republican Councilman Steve Kozachik’s neighborhood, because he says that the Dems on the council won’t let him use funds to fix potholes there.)

Anyway, Shaun McClusky and Ron Asta are flung off one way; Pat Darcy goes in another; and Marshall Home flies off in the direction of his mothership. Only Jonathan Rothschild is left in the bed of the truck, because, as a lawyer, he had enough sense to strap himself in, in the event of just such an occurrence. Who knows how much damage he could have done to somebody’s lawn with his pointy head and pretentious name?

The Green Party candidates also survived the mishap. They had refused to get in the truck in the first place, either because its rate of fossil-fuel consumption was an affront to all human beings, or it consumed fossil fuel, period.

Scattered along the roadway, the two Republicans, one sorta Democrat and the independent guy are all scratching their heads, wondering what happened. Well, what happened is that they all failed to handle their bidness. One of the first things that any candidate must do is to gather enough signatures from qualified voters to get one’s name on the ballot. It’s kind of a pain in the butt, but it’s necessary to separate the serious candidates from the knuckleheads, and it probably serves to keep the ballot itself from being a few dozen pages long.

Just as collecting the signatures and handing them in to be verified is part of the process, so, too, is the inevitable challenge from one or more of one’s potential opponents. There are so many things that could go wrong with the collection of the signatures that allowing somebody else to skate by, unchallenged, is neither gentlemanly nor lady-like. It’s stupid.

When Ron Asta got knocked out, he was quoted as saying, “Politics used to be fun. Now it’s hardball.”

No, Ron, it’s always been hardball. Just ask that Julius Caesar guy.

While outright fraud takes place from time to time, it seems likely that a significant number of disqualified signatures were simple, honest mistakes. Maybe the signer doesn’t live in the city, or maybe he had already signed another petition, believing (incorrectly) that it was OK to sign multiple nominating petitions. Maybe he hadn’t voted in a while, and/or his voter status had changed.

It’s simply prudent to challenge the petitions of others, and it’s even more prudent for those who are circulating the petitions to see to it that they come in early and well over the number of signatures needed, knowing that some will inevitably be disqualified.

My radio co-host, Emil Franzi, has been engaging in political rat fornication since the Eisenhower days. He was livid when he saw that Shaun McClusky turned in (at the last minute) petitions with only 123 more signatures than the 1,060 minimum required. Franzi says that, in such situations, he always aims for a 40 to 50 percent cushion, just to be safe. McClusky’s “cushion” was less than 12 percent, and it didn’t hold up.

Franzi has the tendency to spit when he gets upset. When he saw McClusky’s numbers, he became like that really fat guy in the restaurant scene in Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life. It was like a freakin’ fire hose.

Somewhat disappointingly, McClusky, Asta, Darcy and Pima County Republican head Brian Miller all attacked the challenges to the petitions, rather than taking the blame for the deficiencies thereof. I’m going to make a sports analogy here, because it’s perfectly apropos; Pat Darcy used to be a jock, so at least he’ll get it; and after all these years, I still enjoy annoying those Tucson Weekly readers who think that sports are part of a fascist plot to keep kids from wearing Birkenstocks.

Here goes: As a player and coach, I’ve been involved in thousands of games, and I’ve lost my fair share. But never once did I lose a game and then complain that I hadn’t known the rules going in. Neither should these guys.

In a time of virulent anti-Democratic Party sentiment, and in a town with a relatively healthy Tea Party movement, it seems ridiculous that a Republican isn’t going to be on the ballot in the race for mayor. (And please accept my apology for having used the words “healthy” and “Tea Party” in the same sentence.)

All that really remains is for Jonathan Rothschild to start planning his inaugural ball. (I hope it’s at Club Congress; I like that place.) There is also the matter of determining which of the two Green Party candidates—Dave Croteau or Mary DeCamp—will represent their party in the general election.

I absolutely can’t wait for the Green Party debate. It’s probably going to get nasty.

Croteau: I made the shoes I’m wearing out of all local products. And just to prove that they are completely bio-degradable, when this debate is over, I am going to eat them and then use the resulting waste product as compost to heat the water in my humble adobe abode.

Decamp: What?! You use heated water?! Planet-hater!

7 replies on “Danehy”

  1. Big sigh. Come listen to what Greens actually have to say, Tom. Really. There are some Shockingly Sane Solutions that Greens offer; alternatives the people will love if we can connect with them. And it’s a capital C in my last name – DeCamp. Thanks for your ongoing humor & your service to our community. These hot old summer days are improved by a dose of humor.

  2. Vote GREEN in this Election. Tucson has had enough of Democrats and Republicans! Tucson DESERVES a Green mayor in the worst way. I am a Conservative, and I want to tell anyone out there to vote GREEN. Mary or Dave would be a great mayor of Tucson, and Tucson would be better for it. GO GREEN!!!

  3. I believe you’re abusing your editorial privilege by listing the Greens as an afterthought, and assuming Tucsonans are beneath taking each contender seriously. The Greens have the right to a fair playing field that hasn’t right off the bat been given to the Dems. And I’m a Dem!

  4. Just want to add, even though I’ve almost always voted dem in the past, I’m going to take each mayoral candidate on his or her merits and vision for Tucson.

  5. OMG, another Danehy column with which I agree! Maybe the heat has gotten to me.

  6. If the republicans can’t muster 1500 signatures in a town of half a million (granted not all voters) they were not to be taken seriously anyway. It makes me sad to elect a Democrat Lawyer but oh well at least he isn’t an abulance chaser like John Edwards was (now he’ll be in jail) :).

  7. I am sorry, Mr. Danehy. It’s unfortunate that you had to humiliate yourself so publicly. To display such ignorance of the political issues about which you are writing must be an embarassment for you. One of the Green Party candidates, Mary DeCamp, is a force to contend with in this town. Just ask Karen Uhlich, who almost lost her Ward 3 seat in 2009 because of DeCamp.

    Mary DeCamp is running on a platform of localization. That means creating economic opportunities for local people as opposed to just giving tax breaks to outside corporations that create wealth primarily for one percent of the population. Besides being sustainable (true, that is an environmental issue), localization also makes economic sense. We have seen enough trickle-down economics to know that the flow of dollars in our community is about as abundant as the water running through Tucson’s washes in the month of June.

    Maybe the results of this upcoming election are pre-ordained, just as you claim. But I hope not. We’ve had enough wealthy lawyers elected in this state to know that government of, by, and for the rich simply doesn’t work. If you look at Mary DeCamp’s record, you will see someone who has served her community selflessly without asking for anything in return. Wouldn’t it be great, just once, to see someone who is actually deserving get voted into office?

    If you knew Mary DeCamp, you would understand that the cartoonish portrayal of her stance doesn’t represent her in the least. I would think that political journalists would at least take the time to get to know the candidates and issues they are covering. I know you love sports and television, Mr. Danehy, and you’re very good at writing about both of them. But if you want to cover politics without embarassing yourself, you may need to turn off your TV and do some research. Maybe you could actually meet Mary DeCamp and find out what she stands for. I think you’ll be very pleasantly surprised.

Comments are closed.