The Tucson City Council took a stab at closing the so-called “gun-show loophole” last week when it voted unanimously to approve a resolution that requires background checks on all firearm purchases at gun shows at the Tucson Convention Center.

“We’re doing exactly what Tucson residents wanted us to do, which is to manage their property in a way that reinforces gun safety,” said Councilwoman Karin Uhlich. “Just because we can’t do everything doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do what’s within our own power.”

The council’s push for background checks is another skirmish in an ongoing national debate over the “universal background checks” that President Barack Obama and other gun-control advocates want to see.

Under federal law, only federally licensed firearm dealers are required to conduct background checks when guns are purchased. People without licenses who want to sell their guns have no access to the background-check database. (For more on how the background check system, see “Background Noise,” Jan. 31)

There’s an increasing push to expand the use of background checks at the national level. Arizona Sen. John McCain said on Meet the Press on Feb. 17 that a bipartisan group of senators was working on a plan that “most of us will be able to support” and a spokeswoman for U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona has told the Weekly that Flake is open to wider background checks on gun sales.

Here in Tucson, City Attorney Mike Rankin has crafted a requirement that, as a part of any lease for the TCC or other city property, background checks be conducted on any gun sales. By making it part of the lease to rent the city’s property, the council can get around a state law that prohibits cities, towns and other jurisdictions from passing ordinances that create restrictions on the possession or sale of firearms that are more restrictive than state statute.

Earlier this month, supporters of background checks packed a council meeting to show their approval of the new requirement.

Pam Simon, a former aide to U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords who was among those shot on Jan. 8, 2011, called the requirement “an absolutely wonderful first step. Overwhelmingly, Americans believe the gun-show loophole should be closed.”

But whether the new restrictions will have much impact on local gun shows remains to be seen. Roadrunner Gun Show manager Lori McMann told the Weekly she didn’t expect to take legal action against the city to force it to drop the requirement for background checks.

“We can’t afford legal action at this time and I don’t believe the NRA or Gun Owners of America plans on picking up any tab for that at this point,” McMann said after the council gave preliminary approval to the new resolution on Feb. 5.

Instead, McMann said she’d move the two or three gun shows she does each year at the TCC to the privately owned Tucson Expo Center. She already does a few shows there each year.

McMann estimates she pays the city around $20,000 per show. The city will also lose out on parking revenues and other related benefits from having the show at the TCC, such as the use of special-duty Tucson police officers for security at the show, according to McMann.

City Councilman Steve Kozachik pegged the loss to the city at closer to $14,000 per show, but said the amount of money didn’t make a difference to him.

“This is not a data-driven decision to me,” said Kozachik, who recently jumped from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party. “It’s about doing what’s right. … The city of Tucson, because of our personal experience, is taking the lead in a state that is über-conservative.”

Kozachik acknowledged that gun shows will go on in Tucson and Pima County, but he said he hoped that other jurisdictions would follow the city’s lead.

“I don’t mind being a leader on this,” Kozachik said. “I hope the county follows suit.”

Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry told the Weekly last month that he doesn’t anticipate that the Board of Supervisors will get involved in overruling the judgment of the Southwestern Fair Commission, which manages the Pima County Fairgrounds, where private vendors produce a few gun shows each year.

The new city policy highlights the challenges in reducing the sale of firearms without a background check, especially in Arizona, where Republican state lawmakers who control the Legislature have pushed to limit the ability of local jurisdictions to require background checks on unlicensed gun sales.

It’s not impossible for states to require background checks on gun sales: McMann said that when she does gun shows in California, she’s required to use a system that allows for background checks on all sales at gun shows.

“It runs very smoothly,” said McMann, who said the state regulates gun shows and requires licenses for businesses that produce them. When unlicensed firearm dealers sell guns, buyers have to go through a 10-day waiting period and a background check.

“They spent millions of dollars setting that up and a whole lot of time,” McMann said.

Getting hassled by The Man Mild-mannered reporter

9 replies on “Checks and Balances”

  1. If I have to have background to purchase at Second Amendment someone should have to at the gunshow — but if I want to buy or trade with my friend/neighbor it is MY BUSINESS

  2. Another knee jerk reaction. Bad folks will always find a way to obtain a firearm. Look at Chicago, NYC and Washington DC, they have the strictest gun laws in the country and the highest gun related crime rate, more restrictions do not work. Why are you penalizing law abiding citizens for the crimes of the few knuckleheads out there? I have grieved over the senseless deaths due to unbalanced people finding a way to obtain firearms illegally, including a loved one. This is not the answer.

  3. The “gun show loophole” is a catchy phrase that the media and the gun control folks love to use. However, the reality is quite different.

    There are very few private sales that happen at gun shows, as the private sellers generally have an overpriced product if it is a modern weapon. The few that I see are antiques or collector’s items.

    Criminals do not go to gun shows anyway.

  4. Ic69hunter wrote:
    “Criminals do not go to gun shows anyway.”

    Bullshit. I recently sat on a jury that convicted a person of making straw purchases at two local gunshows. BTW it was the background checks that tripped him up.

  5. Nam687Ovet wrote:
    “Look at Chicago, NYC and Washington DC, they have the strictest gun laws in the country and the highest gun related crime rate, more restrictions do not work. “

    In 2012 there were 7 cities with much fewer gun restrictions that had higher rates of gun deaths (than Chicago). Unclear what the poster means by “gun related crime” or where his statistics come from.

    http://www.redeyechicago.com/news/redeye-h…

  6. Loophole? That’s what the gun show is a loophole? Gunophobia is alive and well in Tucson! Ignorance guiding actions taken without supporting statistics, quite like Homophobes banning Homosexuals from being scout masters, common sense that makes no sense in statistical logic. 1.9% of the trade show guns across the country are used in crimes, this leaves 98.1% of the guns acquired by other means used for the rest? I was at a dinner the other night with a table of gunophobes talking about this and that all “common sense” driven by media bias of course no statistics to support any of what was being said just heads bobbing in unison like programmed zombies, the modern voter it seems. Finally I had enough and said “well if we want to really make a dent in this issue taking away my right to shop for a defense weapon at a gun show in Tucson isn’t how to do it, why don’t we ban Black males who represent 7% of the U.S. population but commit 60% of the violent crime from owning guns, seems like a more direct action we could take!” You could have heard a pin drop, the rather loud lady who was driving the conversation barely missed a beat as she said “you can’t do that, you cannot punish and take away the rights of those who don’t cause problems to solve problems created by others that is Un-American, not to mention racist!” I looked her in the eyes and said “exactly my point, now you know how I feel about this action you are taking banning ME from buying a defense weapon because of the actions of others, of course we should not single out Black males and of course it is because you cannot make a sweeping law that lumps everyone together as a potential criminal but that is exactly what you are doing!” As those loud and uninformed usually do she sputtered a few unintelligible words then became silent.
    This is ignorance driving common sense, typical emotion driven action, no stats to back up the action, Steve who I support should be embarrassed taking the lead in this witch hunt type mentality sweeping the country, politics instead of real solutions as usual. Mental health should drive this issue not gun show control, insanity on display!

    Bill Heath

    Local business owner.

  7. Wise-guy: I prefer to view the FBI crime stats as everything that comes out of Chicago is spun to fit the liberla agenda. The FBI for the most part doesn’t cave to special interests.

  8. “I prefer to view the FBI crime stats as everything that comes out of Chicago is spun to fit the liberla agenda.”

    Unlike yourself, I provided a link to back my assertion. Thus far, all I smell is smoke coming out of a fetid orifice from you.

Comments are closed.