The next time someone tells you charter schools are superior to district schools—because, “Look at BASIS!” “Look at Louisiana!” “Look at [fill in the blank]!”—and has FACTS and FIGURES to back it up, tell them charter schools have a significantly lower graduation rate than district schools, and hit them with some FACTS and FIGURES of your own.
And, by the way, even if both of you have good data, more often than not the comparisons don’t mean a hell of a lot when it comes to showing that charters are better that district schools or vice versa.
The seventh annual report on U.S. graduation rates just came out. According to the report:
“Seven percent (7%) of regular district public schools, or roughly 1,000 schools nationwide, were low-graduation rate high schools.”
“Thirty percent (30%) of charter schools were low-graduation-rate high schools.”
The study is chock full o’ stats. Here are a few more. District schools have an average 85 percent graduation rate, while charters have an average 70 percent graduation rate. And if you look at virtual schools—online schools where the students work from home, like the K12 Inc. schools (such as Arizona Virtual Academy), 87 percent are low graduation rate schools, with a shockingly low 40 percent average graduation rate.
If I were anti-charter, which I’m not, and wanted to score points, which I don’t, I’d say, “See? All those district schools that the ‘education reform’/privatizer folks love to complain about are doing a better job graduating students than the charters they praise to the skies.” But that’s ridiculous, because these stats, like so many used against district schools, don’t lend themselves to direct comparison.
Graduation rates only tell you the number of students who got a D- or better in the required number of classes and passed either the state’s high stakes test or some alternative method of evaluation. They’re not a measure of the education which led to that diploma. Really, they don’t actually tell you the percentage of students receiving a diploma, since no one does a very good job of tracking whether students dropped out or graduated elsewhere. And if more charter school students come from low income households than in district schools, which is especially true in some states, charter schools will show a lower graduation rate even if they do as well as or better than district schools with similar students.
The moral of this story is, let’s not put too much stake in comparisons of graduation rates. And let’s use the same caution when someone, especially someone who has a horse in the race, throws numbers around “proving” that one school, or one type of school, is superior to another, because they generally begin with their biased conclusions, then work their way back to facts which back them up. Caveat emptor, boys and girls.
This article appears in May 5-11, 2016.

TUSD has paid employees that pursue truancy problems to get them back in school to improve their graduation rates. Do other schools?
“Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable.” — Mark Twain (1835-1910)
Again these are national stats, from a source dominated by the Obama Politburo! Not Arizona specific enough to prove the Safier highlighted implications about our state, err, not his as he is a Californian ! Look at how destroyed the educational system is in that banana Republic!
Believe anything he publishes at your factual peril as usual. Damn lies his statistics!
Mr Safier wrote…
“And if you look at virtual schools—online schools where the students work from home, like the K12 Inc. schools (such as Arizona Virtual Academy), 87 percent are low graduation rate schools, with a shockingly low 40 percent average graduation rate.”
TUSD – Tucson Distance Learning 4 Year Graduation Rate 2015 – 12.82%
So his are biased conclusions?
Cynthia Weiss your information is incorrect. Here is the correct data for 2015 and the overall graduation rate is 87%. 12.82 %is just one area of the entire system which is vast.
https://tusdstats.tusd1.org/paweb/aggD/gra…
Guardians,
Look again, I was comparing the TUSD online program with AZVA, TUSD online program is much worse than AzVA. In fact Mr Safier called AzVA shockingly low. Wonder what he considers the 12.82% for TUSD online program.
Charter schools, supported by taxpayers, are public schools, just with less transparency. I recall when they started out here, they mostly competed with the “other” public schools for troubled students, the potential drop-outs, and that was a good thing – at least better than nothing for the kids. Some of those charter schools that did not go under probably deserve some of that same merit, but I have seen more than a few morph into opaque money making machines, both non-profits and for-profits alike. As taxpayer supported schools of choice, all charter schools need to report every penny of administrative overhead – either willingly or under the guidelines of a fair legal statute.