New York magazine’s Jonathan Chait laughs at Sen. John McCain’s “Real American Jobs Act””:
The premise of Obama’s proposal was that the two parties couldn’t agree on their long-term vision of government, but the economic emergency was too severe to wait until the election to settle it, so they should act immediately on short-term ideas that have bipartisan support. The GOP response is to issue a series of exclusively long-term proposals lacking any bipartisan support. There’s not much pretense of intending to address the current crisis when your plan has as its cornerstone the passage of a Constitutional amendment.
Politico dryly notes, “Senate Republicans are taking on a risk by putting their ideas in legislative language. They could open themselves up to criticism from Democrats if official budget scorekeepers show that the price tag could drive up the deficit and if economists are dubious on whether it would actually create jobs.”
Let me put this a bit more clearly. There is zero chance that any independent agency or macroeconomic forecaster scores this proposal as either reducing the deficit or increasing employment over the next year. On the deficit, they may propose to cut tax rates, offset by spending cuts or closing tax deductions, but the latter will be totally unspecified. On jobs, the GOP simply will not engage with the premise of the entire macroeconomic forecasting field that the economy is suffering from a lack of demand. The purpose of this bill is to straddle that awkward divide, and provide a sound bite to answer Obama when he says he has a jobs plan.
This article appears in Oct 13-19, 2011.

Quite an analysis from Chait who leans so far left that its amazing he doesn’t fall over. Both sides need to find a way to make something happen and soon. Nobody has the kahunas to come out and say what needs to happen and make it so. SOS different day. Chait does spell quite well to give him some credit.
OK, so the American Jobs Act proposal is a sham, as you said. Now again, how is that the Republican’s fault? Please explain that to me in straightforward terms. The President proposes junk, and it is the Republicans fault? Huh?
When did this rag become the “voice” for Local “news”? This is a sick uninformed rag that deserves consideration for use in outdoor toilets.
Mammey, you’re going to have to work on your reading comprehension before we can have a conversation. Not to hurt your feelings, but just to guide you a little.
Surely Nintz wasn’t trying to “hurt the feelings” of the person he/she/it insulted. I’m sure that Nintz would prefer it if he/she/it could simply hurl insults and not have any retaliation. Tough. Things one says have consequences.
I’d say that Mammey was not trying to have a conversation with you, Nintz. I’ve found it a useless occupation with certain members of the public who are not all that smart – being significantly brainwashed by ideological concerns.
Hey Dan Starr: I’d say you need to keep up with the comments section. My comment was a riff off Mammey’s earlier comment toward Dan Gibson. I imagine that if you read what he wrote there, the context would make more sense to you.
Here, check it out: http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archi…