19 replies on “Because Every Blog Needs an Occasional Kitten Video”

  1. These aren’t the official cats of the Southcentral Bureau. These are random kitties we found on YouTube. If the two neutered males at the Southcentral Bureau somehow find a way to multiply, that’ll be news, trust me.

  2. Superstation WGN endlessly (like moronically) runs American Favorite Videos going back into 1980s big hair times, many of which feature set-up animals and set-up children. So now we have it all yet again with this from Youtube and Tucson Weekly with no analytic commentary from TW in regard to using animals for media purposes, not to mention the inevitable stray animal problem in Tucson and most cities. All TW can do is giggle and do the the hip cynical thing like they invented it. O

  3. Yet you provided your own commentary, Red Star. Looks like someone is reading a little too far into an occasional kitten video, which is what it merely is.

  4. Oh my!

    To the intern: on the one hand, “I just wasted a minute and 36 seconds of my precious young life watching that.” (#3)

    On the other hand, “Looks like someone is reading a little too far into an occasional kitten video, which is what it merely is.” (#6)

    What, hands across the water or something? Don’t worry you’ll get there.

    To the Editor: But, but…the Weekly doesn’t advertise on Google…

  5. Good question but no, it’s Kim’s. Kimwipes ™. Those wipes are generally used in laboratories, you know where they do experiments ‘n stuff…

  6. Hey Boegle…hey! Get a dog (picture). The continuing idea of a man and a cat (picture) generates in society, ANY society, at ANY time is, well, revealing to say the least.

    Give the cat a chance. Let it’s picture be published by an editor that doesn’t have it’s sexuality in an ongoing dysfunctional state.

    Wait, I just realized you have no idea what I mean.

    Clue: Why is it that “men” who don’t “like” girls tend to gravitate toward cats rather than dogs?

  7. The comments policy warns of removal of “personal attacks, insults, or threatening language.” Comment 11 seems like a violation even to me, a “man who likes girls”–well, actually, grown-up, legal women.

  8. Wow! From cute little kitties to outright bigotry!
    We live in a wired, weird world.

  9. James, he were going after anyone but me, I’d throw it off in a heartbeat. As it stands, I’ll leave it up to show the ignorance that’s out there. And I’d also like to let Mr. Stevenson know my significant other’s last dog was a pitbull.

  10. As far as I can tell, the kittens video is meant to be a metaphor for Jim Nintzel, Saxon Burns and Kelli Hart fighting about the Arizona coin design.

    My guess is that Nintzel is the one in the box, and Saxon and Kelli are the ones biting his ears.

  11. I just read Jim Stevenson’s comment. What a lame-ass! Dichotomies between “cat people” and “dog people” are for 3rd graders. There’s enough room in the world to have affection for both species.

    Me, I like opossums. That’s because I’m kinky.

  12. I’m speechless. Has there been a problem with toner fumes in the office or something?

    I was always under the impression that real “men” don’t need to devalue another’s sexuality in order to be secure in their own. Hmm.

  13. I learned in junior high that men check their nails by bending their fingers forward over their palms. Women (and girly men) turn their hand over and examine the fingers all splayed out. It’s amazing how worthless that schoolyard crap about fingernails, cats, dogs and sexuality is.

  14. Dear Jimmy Boegle: From now on please only post video of Football games and Hooters chicks sucking on BBQ chicken wings in slo-mo. Anything else will be cause for us to analyze your psyche.

    That goes for YOU, too, Mr. Nintzel!

Comments are closed.