A whole new issue o’ the Weekly is online and ready for your attention, love and scorn. Check it out!

And here’s this week’s Ask a Mexican YouTube Edicion:

This article appears in Feb 28 – Mar 5, 2008.

14 replies on “An All-New Issue”

  1. Re: “Rep. Steve Farley is continuing the push to rescue some of the gargantuan statues at Magic Carpet Golf, the goofy-golf course on Speedway Boulevard that’s set to close later this year now that the property has been sold.”
    .
    Magic Carpet Golf is not only completely closed and has “no trespassing” signs up, it’s been dead for more than two months. Members of Vanishing Tucson got to tour the grounds and take photos in late January. The property is sold and shut down — the story here is that it’s expected to be completely demolished, and Farley is reaching out to upset members of the community who want the statues saved. On the other hand, some view the free-spending Farley’s latest venture as a waste of government time and resources.

  4. Duh!It’s early and I had a rough night staying up and watching Project Runway….

  5. Did I say “set to close later this year”? I meant to say “close permanently and be torn down.” Or else: “that closed earlier this year.” I just got so excited about the celebrity golf tourney that I got all disconfabulated.

  6. In other words, thanks for the catch, IPH. We will be running a correction, and have corrected the online version.

  9. The to be presented memo’s seem to be still to be linked up here?

    What’s up with that?

    http://www.tucsonweekly.com/gbase/Currents/Content?oid=oid%3A107536

    Does not have them and it only links back to here….
    “Go to blog.tucsonweekly.com to see the memorandums heading to the Pima County Board of Supervisors regarding election integrity, and other memos regarding election policy.”

    But apparently J.T. is getting lots of traffic for his video, and it doesn’t load in I.E. at all.

    Respectfully J.T. perhaps you could put some text up as all I’ve found in either link is the crashing or nonworking video. And the video, what I heard of it, is only excerpts of the Sup’s meeting.

    At least we now regard the lack of any proper challenge to the election being a fact. An amazingly odd one considering the amount of work expended to prove it should of been challenged.

    The quote is still vivid “. . .such an order is hard to get.” It’s even more unlikely if you don’t try.

    The party represents those registered, not just those who vote. So why won’t it recognise that? Who can we rely upon to sue the party for not litigating for us? How can there be such silence in the face of it not even running a candidate?

    Where is the outrage of all those who found out there was no Democrat to vote for for Mayor? Where has the article that attempts to explain, to credibly explain, how such a thing could happen without extreme corruption been hiding? Surely the problem is with me, that I have failed to find it? There must be more then the essentially affectionately facetious TW’s “get out of town” on this?

    Allow SOME light.

  11. Karl, thanks for the heads up. I got 7 hits from here. No quicktime? I’ll put up a wmv file.

Comments are closed.