Continental dining these days is often viewed as archaic. It’s what
your grandparents considered fine dining. People say the food is
old-fashioned; the décor is often dreary, and the wine list can
be straight out of the time of Methuselah.

But then there is Amber, an eastside establishment that combines the
best of old-world Continental dining and new-world style.

Located in the site where the Olive Tree spent many years, Amber
serves Polish food and dishes from other parts of Europe. Yes, the
crowd was of a certain age you’d expect to see at a Continental
restaurant, but that’s not saying the next generation won’t enjoy
dining here. I think they might even learn something.

The décor is anything but dreary. The place also serves as an
art gallery, and the walls are filled with bright, colorful paintings.
The background music is mostly classical, but I would not expect
anything else.

We made reservations to dine early on a Saturday evening, and it was
a good thing we did. Every table was full, and several tables turned
over while we sat there. People were even eating in the barroom, which
also serves as the entryway.

Earth tones and the art, by local artists, dominate the dining room.
There is also a lovely patio, although it wasn’t being used due to the
heat.

Missing was a hallmark of Continental dining: Amber does not have a
huge menu. But that could be a good thing. We started with the potato
pancakes ($7) for John, and the French onion soup ($6) for me. For
entrées, John ordered the Hungarian goulash ($18), and I ordered
the veal schnitzel ($24). We each ordered a glass of pinot grigio ($7
each) from the rather modern wine list.

If you flinch at those prices, note that the portions here are
immense—so much so that we took enough food home for dinner the
next evening. Most other patrons got to-go boxes as well.

The appetizers were hefty. Six potato pancakes trimmed with a swirl
of sour cream and some dabs of applesauce sat on John’s plate. They
were about three inches across, a quarter-inch thick and packed with
potato flavor. And as good as they were, we ended up taking three of
them home.

I have to admit that I set the bar pretty high when it comes to
French onion soup. I grew up eating this yummy dish at a place called
The Corner House in Racine, Wis., and no other version I’ve had has
come close. Most are too salty, too beefy or covered with too much
cheese—but I truly enjoyed Amber’s version. Savory beef broth and
plenty of tender onions had been baked in a small crock, then topped
with French bread and just the right amount of bubbly,
golden-brown-on-the-edges cheese. This soup was almost as
good—almost.

Service was totally pleasant and informative. Our server truly
seemed to care that we enjoyed ourselves.

Our entrées were also huge. John received a large potato
pancake containing tender chunks of beef and vegetables with a pop of
sweet, smoky paprika. Even though goulash is sort of a winter dish,
this was still delightful in the dead of summer.

My schnitzel consisted of two thin, tender pieces of veal that were
dipped in an egg batter and sautéed to a golden brown. I love
schnitzel, and this one didn’t disappoint. It was served alongside a
portion of egg noodles tossed in a creamy mushroom bacon sauce that
could have been a meal itself; it was a little like stroganoff, without
the beef. This was a totally satisfying dish in every sense of the
word.

For dessert, we chose the European cheesecake ($7). Again, this was
enough for two people, or maybe more. Unlike the cloying sweet stuff we
Americans are used to, Amber’s cheesecake was wonderfully mild, with
the cream cheese being the forward flavor. Little bits of candied lemon
peel added a tartness that was surprising.

And then there was the complimentary Nalewka Babuni, a Polish
dessert wine served after every dinner. Neither of us are fans of sweet
wines, but we were pleasantly surprised that it wasn’t as sweet or
sticky as we feared.

The lunch menu has most of the same menu items, but in smaller
portions and with lower prices. The meat pierogi ($9.95) that John
ordered is $14 at dinner, although that comes with sauerkraut. My
schnitzel at dinner was $24; at lunch, it is $16, but I can’t attest to
the lunch size. I ordered the turkey Reuben ($9.95), which came with a
choice of sides; I took the rice pilaf.

Although service was again friendly and professional, it seemed to
take an inordinately long time to get our food.

There were six pierogi on the plate, each filled plump with shredded
beef. They were tasty as far as pierogi go, but the plate could’ve used
something besides three tiny tomato slices.

My sandwich, on the other hand, was a fine example of what a Reuben
should be, in spite of the fact that it included turkey instead of
corned beef. The marble rye was crispy; the Swiss cheese was melted
with golden brown edges; the turkey was piled high; and there was the
perfect amount of tangy Thousand Island dressing. The hefty side of
pilaf was fluffy and light, with just a hint of chicken flavor.

Dessert at lunch usually means a nap later, but we had to try the
crepes Suzette ($7). Four paper-thin crepes were dressed in a cherry
sauce and oodles of butter, then topped with a scoop of ice cream. Both
sweet and savory, the crepes were a pleasant end to our meal.

Amber offers up a wonderful slice of gracious hospitality along with
outstanding examples of Eastern European and Polish food—with
style to boot. What a delightful change!

10 replies on “Updated Continental”

  1. schnitzel, cheesecake, and ruebens…sounds really authentic on the eastern- european food. also, the fact that you arent a fan of dessert wines as they are too “sticky” or “sweet,” yet you enjoyed this backward cherry dessert mess really shows your aptitude as a food critic. i apologize for coming off as harsh, but i thought the weekly had some solid reviewers. perhaps you should work for the star and send ms. kuder on the next job.

  2. This struck me as a well-written review. I am at a loss to understand LeCub’s issue with it. I see no conflict between not liking dessert wines, and still liking desert. I would expect that describes most people. Having an Omaha, NB item on the menu, like the Reuben, is no more problematic than the crepe suzette. I liked seeing a positive review of a worthwhile place.

  3. I am glad that the reviewer enjoyed her dessert, but it was not Crepes Suzette. Classically, Crepes Suzette are prepared tableside and involve crepes that, according to the History of Crepes Suzette, are “served hot with a sauce of sugar, orange juice, and liqueur (usually Grand Marnier). Brandy is poured over the crepes and then lit. ”

    There are no cherries or ice cream involved.

    I am surprised that the Weekly didn’t point out that the restaurant is misnaming its offerings. If I had ordered Crepes Suzette and got a cherry and ice cream concoction, I would have been disappointed and angry.

  4. I do know what crepes suzette are and I considered noting the “misnaming” but I figured my smart readers would be able to figure it out.

  5. Because of your article, we went to Amber yesterday evening. We found the food was very good and tasted authentic “European”. The potato pancakes were almost as good as mine–according to my husband. The service was excellent. We will definitely invite our friends to join us on our next visit.

  6. Great passive-aggressive response! Imagine if a political journalist misquoted a politician, then also wrote incorrect facts. Then when confronted would say, “I figured my smart readers would be able to figure it out (what they actually said or did).”

    Like I said before…terrible review.

  7. I was delighted with the attention you showed towards the potato pancakes as I consider anything potato the focal point of a meal.

    Linus

  8. After reading several of the writer’s reviews, I do have to agree that, well, they just don’t cut it. First of all, Eastern European food is not considered Continental food, it is slavic, Eastern European food, there is a difference. To say that this type of food is fine dining is totally wrong as it is considered peasant food, very good peasant food at that and that is what it is…. I do suggest to the writer to start using Wikipedia to have some knowledge about the different food cultures she is describing without having the knowledge of even the simplest facts. Regarding the Crepe Suzette, no, that is not acceptable, either the writer knows what they are or she looks it up, or she doesn’t mention it. Who wants to read false statements? If it would happen in one review, ok, but every second review by this writer is full of mistakes, implied, or obvious. Very superficial and narrow minded reviews without the level of understanding one would expect from a “food” “writer”.

Comments are closed.