When I visited the Signature Grill at the JW Marriott Starr Pass
back in October (see “Mixed Views,” Oct. 16), I fell in love with the
view, but was vexed by the hit-and-miss food and service—and
downright annoyed by the restaurant’s Web site, which featured outdated
menus and specials.

After that review, the folks at the Starr Pass asked us to give the
Signature Grill another chance; we agreed, per our policy, to come back
after at least three months had passed. I am happy to report that we
found delicious food and fine service upon our return.

But that damn Web site still needs an update. As of this writing,
the online dinner menu is offering a “signature autumn sampler,” with
an appetizer/soup/salad, an entrée and a dessert for $39. Great
deal … but autumn?

That online menu displays a diverse dinner offering of about 16
entrées. The reality at the JW Marriott: a dinner menu with
seven entrées. It seems the recession has hit the Signature
Grill menu, with management choosing to trim the offerings down to the
best of the bunch.

This may not be a bad strategy: Everything we had was fantastic.

They’re still offering that fantastic sampler special for $39, so we
indulged. I picked the deconstructed tortilla soup (separately $8) as
my starter, and Garrett chose the tableside guacamole ($10); plus, we
added on one of our favorites from our first visits, the rock- shrimp
ceviche ($10). For entrées, Garrett got the shrimp-crusted
opakapaka with sun-dried totato polenta and chipotle beurre blanc
($32), and I picked the pecan-crusted lamb with jalapeño
cornbread pudding ($33).

As we waited for our appetizers, we took in the view of the city’s
lights taking effect as the sun set, and of guests frolicking in the
hotel’s lazy river. Garrett savored the white-wine sangria ($8) that
the bar whipped up for him, even though it’s not on their menu, while I
enjoyed a Maker’s Mark and Coke ($7) and munched on the warm
jalapeño cheddar bread. Whereas service was up and down during
our visits back in October, our server was prompt, friendly and helpful
this time around.

The starters were all delightful. The ceviche was again a
success—I love those pickled onions!—and the tableside
guacamole—a dud the first time around—was quite tasty, with
jalapeños, tomatoes, garlic, cilantro, onion and salt all
enhancing the avocado base. My soup, delivered in a small cast-iron
vessel, was also good—it was more of a chicken soup than a true
tortilla soup, but I liked it, and the “deconstructed part” was cute:
You choose how much lime, cilantro, spice and tortilla strips to
add.

The entrées seemed slightly delayed, but they were worth the
wait: The lamb was the best I have ever had. My only complaint about
the juicy, flavorful, chops (two of them, with two bones in each) was
that I wanted more. The cornbread pudding, delivered in a miniature
iron skillet, was practically molten at first, but as it cooled, the
flavors came out of hiding nicely. Garrett’s opakapaka (read: snapper)
was fantastic. We couldn’t taste that much shrimp, but the flavor of
the tender fish, the creaminess of the polenta and the subtle heat of
the buerre blanc meant the shrimp was not missed.

The meal was amazing—probably one of the top 10 we’ve had in
Tucson—but we decided to give our stomachs a break by getting our
desserts to go ($9 separately). The green apple crisp was only OK, but
the cinnamon ice cream that accompanied it was exquisite; the chocolate
cake hit the spot.

I’ll be eagerly returning to the Signature Grill for that amazing
view and that stunningly good lamb—especially as long as they
have that $39 deal. Now, if they could only find someone to regularly
update their Web site menus …

14 replies on “Savoring the Region”

  1. The writing here is badly flawed. The author uses the word “amazing” twice, the phrase “I picked” twice, the word “fantastic” three times. More egregious still is his wooden repetitiveness, where he consistently employs the same trope of subject-word-adjective/adverb at every opportunity. Thus, “Everything we had was fantastic.” “Our server was prompt, friendly and helpful…” “The starters were all delightful.” “The ceviche was again a success…” “My soup…was also good…” “The lamb was the best I ever had.” “The cornbread pudding…was practically molten…”Garrett’s opakapaka… was fantastic. (Note: who the hell is Garrett? Where has he suddenly come from?) “The meal was amazing.” The green apple crisp was only OK.” …”the cinnamon ice cream… was exquisite.” And, for a change of pace…”the chocolate cake hit the spot.”

    This kind of thing is disheartening. And sadly, the author is the Editor of the Weekly.

    Burp!

  2. Thanks for reading, Escoffier. I especially appreciate the fact that you took the time to read so closely. It’s great to have such detail-oriented fans!

  3. Jimmy, there are homos reviewing the food, Jews noshing around, and Mexicans playing into well earned stero types. Are you telling me there is no room for a bigot?

  4. What website are you referring to? I’d rather see an outdated menu than none at all. Could they have taken it offine??

  5. It appears that they’ve redesigned their Web site within the last week or so, and have gone from an incorrect menu to NO menu.

  6. Ohhh Mr. Boegle – I challenge you to check out the Catalina Steakhouse (also at Starr Pass) – I don’t think the Weekly has reviewed this place yet?? I’ve had two horrible experiences there – I wonder how you would fare?? Two hints to look for: “diver” scallops the size of quarters and onion soup so sickeningly sweet, you’d wish you ordered it for dessert (blech.) The only saving grace was delicious steak (but not enough to justify the check!)

  7. Where did Garrett come from? Suddenly? He has been at the Tucson Weekly trough for as long as I can remember.

  8. Hey Jimmy, just wanted to say thanks for the kind words about my service! I take my job seriously and it means a lot. It’s not often I get any positive reinforcement at my job! I told all my bosses that I waited on you guys and I didn’t even get so much as a pat on the back after your great review!

Comments are closed.