“Hotel food has gone through a renaissance. Hotel food used to be
bland and boring, but that’s not true anymore.”
—Jason Weaver, executive chef of The French Room in Dallas’
Adolphus Hotel, to USA Today
Hotel restaurants don’t get a fair shake. Yes, a lot of lame food is
still served at hotels, but more and more places are aiming to raise
that figurative bar. That brings us to Fire + Spice, at the Sheraton on
Grant Road.
Fire + Spice opened earlier this year after a significant renovation
at the Sheraton; it’s modeled after a sister restaurant with the same
name at the Sheraton Phoenix Airport Hotel in Tempe. The menu at
Tucson’s Fire + Spice—masterminded by executive chef (and Tucson
native) David Ferrara—is more modest than the menu at the
original Fire + Spice. A dozen starters (appetizers, soups and salads)
join four sandwiches and 10 entrées as lunch/dinner offerings.
(Breakfast is served from 6 to 10:30 a.m., daily; we didn’t get to
sample anything from the breakfast menu, which includes a Sonoran
Benedict, $9, and chorizo and eggs, $9.)
The verdict: There are some true gems to be found at this poolside
restaurant, although some dishes were not executed as well as they
could have been.
First off, a warning: The restaurant is harder to find than it
should be. We walked in the hotel’s main doors and wandered around a
bit before getting directions. Even then, we got lost, walking all the
way around the courtyard/pool area before finding the restaurant.
Here’s a tip: Go in the main doors and follow the wall to the left
until you see a glass door into the courtyard area. Go through that
door and keep left until you see a bar/restaurant area, next to the
pool. That’s Fire + Spice.
Garrett and I chose to be seated inside. We ordered the native
nachos with chicken ($8), the jalapeño snake bites ($8) and a
cup of tortilla soup for starters ($4). I chose the grilled fish tacos
(an overly pricey $16) for my main course, while Garrett picked the
Baja enchiladas with chicken ($12).
Our server—who was quite capable, although he could have used
a little more assistance—brought the nachos and snake bites
first. The nachos were a complete delight: Red and blue corn chips were
mixed with ample amounts of tasty, moist chicken machaca, asadero
cheese, guacamole and salsa fresca. The snake bites were also
delicious—but how could jalapeño peppers stuffed with a
cilantro mousse, cream cheese and shrimp before being wrapped in bacon
not be delicious? The only problem was that the shrimp’s flavor
was masked by the more dominant ingredients.
The tortilla soup was the strangest dish we sampled. It was
presented beautifully—in a odd white bowl, with the broth poured
over the other ingredients by the server, à la the late,
lamented Terra Cotta—but I had several qualms. First, tortillas
were barely a factor; a few chips offered a visual accent and a small
bit of texture, but that was all. Second, the broth seemed beef-based.
The resulting soup (which also included tomatoes, cilantro, avocado,
asadero cheese and a lot of pepper) was not unpleasant, but it was not
necessarily an improvement over expectations.
The entrées were merely acceptable. My tacos included a fair
amount of breaded cod, along with corn, red pepper and onions; they
were fine, but were actually overshadowed by the excellent grilled
squash served alongside. Garrett’s two small chicken enchiladas were
surprisingly bereft of chicken. The enchiladas were listed as “spicy”
on the menu, although there was very little spice, and it all seemed
concentrated in the sauce on the top. It was an execution issue: With
some more chicken and a better distribution of sauce, these enchiladas
could have been quite good.
We decided to end the meal with the “chocolate of the moment”:
Mexican chocolate cake ($7), with cinnamon adding the “Mexican”
element. Although it was a bit dry, we enjoyed it.
We returned about a week later for lunch. We had almost the entire
restaurant to ourselves, and we chose to sit outside and enjoy the
beautiful weather. Fire + Spice actually offers three fairly distinct
seating options: outside near the pool; inside near the bar (open to
the pool area), where TVs offer an upscale sports-bar feel; and the
quieter back area (although a few TVs can be found there, too). Black
tables mix with Southwestern colors in the carpets (light orange,
brown, yellow, grey) and wallpaper (orange to beige); overall, it has a
nice, clean feel.
We split the Sonoran quesadilla with chicken ($8) to start; I picked
the Santa Rita steak salad ($11) as my entrée, while Garrett
selected the grilled chicken pasta ($15). The quesadilla, divided into
four pieces, was enjoyable, although the kitchen was again stingy with
the chicken.
My steak salad was the best entrée we enjoyed on our two
visits. The strip steak was perfectly prepared (medium rare), and the
greens, tomatoes and cojita cheese were all fresh. The cilantro lime
vinaigrette was a bit strong, but overall, this was an excellent salad.
Garrett’s pasta, on the other hand, let us down. It was surprisingly
watery; perhaps the kitchen didn’t drain the pasta sufficiently before
adding the chicken and the roasted-red-pepper cream sauce. Also, while
the menu promised sun-dried tomatoes, there were almost none to be
found.
Execution, or a lack thereof, again reared its head with dessert. We
chose the house specialty: s’mores ($7). The graham crackers were crisp
and flavorful, and the freshly made marshmallows were amazing. However,
the amount of chocolate was minute, both on the s’mores and in the
accompanying shots of hot chocolate (with the chile-dominated house
spice mix coating the shot-glass rims). The hot-chocolate shots were so
watery that the kitchen clearly made a mistake.
If the kitchen ever gets its act together, Fire + Spice could
actually become truly special. As it stands, Fire + Spice is still
worth a look, thanks to the delicious appetizers and the fine
service.
This article appears in Jun 11-17, 2009.

Glad to see you and Garrett had another free meal. Must be great to be the editor.
Why ya hatin’, Scarpia B? If reviewing restaurants were such a great perk, I’d do it every week. And–trust me on this–if I didn’t have to worry about my freelance budget, I’d gladly fire myself from reviewing. I have enough on my plate … like responding to overly cynical, rude, baseless comments.
Any newspaper worth its salt pays for the reviewers meals.
And any reviewer worth her salt would place an apostrophe where it rightly belongs.
Now we know why the kitchen staff can’t get its act together… they’re all over here trying to be clever!
Touched a nerve, did I.
It’s hard to dislike the prom queen.
its: possessive adjective corresponding to it
• The prom had wound its way to a close.
Just to make sure.
No nerves were touched; I just don’t get people who hop on the Internet and start hating.
RC- check the word “reviewers” in your first post.
thanks….I don’t edit my blogging as carefully as I do my real writing so it helps when someone else does.
Is that what it takes to get a free meal?? Critize a restaurant……
I’ve been there before for Jazz nights & I disagree with you both.
No, what it takes to “get a free meal” is a knowledge of food and an open mind to always learn more, an ability to write your thoughts in a clear and creative way and being able to get your work done in a timely manner.
That is only the beginning.
I’m not sure what you mean that you disagree with both of us?
Can you explain? I had nothing to do with this review.
Not talking to you rconnelly……….
This has to do with the article
Does anybody actually have a review on the food? I was expecting to find reader reviews to see if I wanted to go here, and all I find is not relevant to the restaurant. I wanted a variety of opinions; I guess I’ll go somewhere else for my information
did you read the review itself, foodie32?
Ha!