The grand stone-and-adobe Otero House, boasting a decorative porch and a brick wall around its tidy front yard, didn’t look like an example of urban blight.
Neither did the Plaza, a Spanish Colonial Revival movie theater with white-washed walls, a tower and a tile roof, designed by the renowned architect Roy Place.
And slum seekers could rule out the Ying On Club too. The two-story building with a pagoda-roofed balcony was a cultural center—and sometime dormitory—that had served Tucson’s Chinese community since the 19th century.
But in the mid-1960s Tucson city officials embarked on a program of “slum removal.” Declaring 80 acres of downtown to be an unredeemable slum, they laid to waste these three venerated buildings and about 260 others—homes, stores, restaurants, bars, even a place of worship. The catastrophic urban-renewal program, endorsed by the voters, leveled Tucson’s oldest neighborhood, including blocks and blocks of adobe Sonoran row-houses, many dating from the 19th century.
It banished some 1,200 residents, most of them Mexican-Americans, along with a smaller number of Chinese-Americans and African-Americans: the racial dimension of the expulsion won the program the angry nickname of brown removal. The city’s historic heart was turned into a wasteland. (See “The Downfall of Downtown,” Tucson Weekly, March 6, 1997)
In an extraordinary, must-see exhibition at the UA Library’s Special Collections, you can actually watch some of the buildings being demolished, on grainy 16 mm. films shot by Paul Smith in 1967. Smith captures the bulldozers smashing into the walls of the Ying On Club, while other trucks fire blasts of water onto its dusty remains, to keep them from blowing across Tucson. Watching the movies feels like watching a death; it’s painful to see Tucson violently laying waste to its own history.
The demolitionists were a little gentler with the Otero House. The city promised to rebuild it, and the grand house was dismantled, not obliterated. In the movie, Smith lovingly records the house’s carved porch posts, all curves and arcs, and documents an imposing fireplace and ceiling beams on the inside. The porch was later rebuilt at the Arizona Historical Society museum and those beams made their way into the Sosa-Carillo-Frémont House, one of the few historic houses the city saved. It was restored as a monument to an Anglo, John Frémont, an early Territorial governor who may never even have lived there.
The Otero House had an authentic connection to one of the oldest Hispanic families in southern Arizona: an ancestor, Don Toribio de Otero, had gotten a land grant from Spanish King Charles V in 1789. Yet the city abandoned its promise to rebuild the house.
The exhibition, “Tucson: Growth, Change and Memories,” also displays for the first time a collection of black-and-white photos of some 72 of the doomed houses. An unknown city staffer, working in 1966 or 1967 just before demolition, documented every building that was to be torn down. These carefully shot photos picture a ghost town; the residents have already been banished and the once lively streets are deserted.
Hauled out of the Special Collections archives by librarian Bob Diaz, the collection of negatives has been digitized for public viewing. Working alongside reps from the Tucson Preservation Foundation, Diaz had 72 of the negatives printed for this show.
The barrio was poor, to be sure, but the long-forgotten photographs put the lie to the city fathers’ 1960s allegations that it was a sea of urban blight. The pictures show a community theater on Meyer—cousin to the still-existing Teatro Carmen—that staged plays in Spanish. A charming mission-style Chinese Evangelical church was on Main. The Busy Bee Café and Jake’s Quick Lunch on West Congress offered cheap eats, and Flores Nacional Drugstore was the place Bob Diaz’s mom would take him when they needed medicine.
There were night spots that the city fathers railed against, the Legal Tender, Barbary Coast (“Home of the Go-Go”) and the Moon Lounge, all on Congress Street. A crumbling “rooming house” was on South Sabino Avenue, a vestige of the city’s old red-light district.
Much of the neighborhood was rundown. But as Lydia Otero documents in her invaluable book “La Calle: Spatial Conflicts and Urban Renewal in a Southwest City,” the city deliberately triggered much of the deterioration. The city had hoped for decades to demolish the Mexican barrio and erect a convention center and government buildings in its place, and for years officials refused to issue permits for repairs and improvements. The poor conditions became a justification for demolition.
This excellent exhibition is not flashy, but it’s important. Documenting as it does a massive city project that was a monumental failure, it should be required viewing for city leaders and anyone who cares about Tucson. And as curator Diaz writes, its images can “help people remember what was lost.”
This article appears in Sep 3-9, 2015.

This is an important exhibit and should be a lesson for us all. Unfortunately, the loss of our architectural and cultural history is about to happen again if the City of Tucson gets its way and bulldozes all of the mid-century modern commercial buildings along Broadway from Euclid to Country Club in the name of progress. That progress is building a wider street that is not needed. Traffic volume has DECLINED over the last few years and stands today at 1989 levels. It is not even close to what it was projected to be in 2015 by the 1987 planning study and that put it on the RTA ballot. Save our history!
Excellent story. Thank you to Bob Diaz who’s work at Special Collections is legendary.
I think Charles Bowden wrote about this in his amazing “Blue Desert”. If I remember correctly, he talks about how the city enacted codes forbidding the use of adobe because it was “unsafe.” That became the pretext for not issuing new permits and more over for using eminent domain laws to seize existing properties in the area that is now the TCC. Almost all were adobe. After the demolition of the neighborhood and the construction of the TCC, the codes regarding adobe were changed back to the way it was before. An obvious abuse of power and government if there ever was one.
My very first job in Tucson was in December 1967 helping archaeologist Jim Ayers document and photograph the buildings in the barrio before they were torn down to make way for the TCC.
And what did Tucson get out of it? A butt-ugly convention center, the zombie-esque La Placita, and a part pf downtown that has never recovered. Bulldoze TCC and La Placita. Build a ballpark like El Paso has SUCCESSFULLY done and add the southern end of the downtown area to the busy downtown scene.
That 1997 article is at — http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tw/03-06-97/cover.htm — and is a very informative but sad read. Sad because much of what the residents were saying (“We can walk everywhere here”, “we know our neighbors here”) has just now apparently pierced the veil of ignorance among City planners, i.e., that walkable human-scale cities work for everyone, and also because we are seeing the same “discourage investment – redlining – call it ‘blight’ – launch bulldozers” cycle play out elsewhere in town. Now instead of a convention center we have boondoggle roadway projects that damage neighborhoods and benefit … who? Speculators? No wonder “they” want to eliminate Tucson’s history, there is money to be made — for some — by repeating it.
As a descendant of Toribio Otero, thank you for this presentation and a special thanks to Lydia for her research and hard work. My Mom would be proud.