Remade, but Why? 

While a film about bullying should resonate in 2013, the new version of Carrie doesn't beat Brian De Palma's version

If you've read the 1974 Stephen King novel, Carrie, and you've seen the 1976 Brian De Palma film of that novel, you know that the book and that film are very different.

If you see the new 2013 version of Carrie starring Chloë Grace Moretz in the role that netted original star Sissy Spacek an Oscar nomination, you'll probably walk away feeling it has more in common with De Palma's film than King's novel.

King's novel, about a bullied telekinetic high school girl who endures one prank too many at the senior prom, was told in a series of episodic news reports, flashbacks and interviews for the most part. It was, dare I say, a sloppy yet entertaining first effort from the legendary King, and De Palma's film improved upon it.

The new film welcomes a few of the novel's plot points back into the storyline, but it takes a lot of the same liberties De Palma took with the nearly four-decade-old novel. In the new version, a few more characters survive the fiery Black Prom Tragedy, and one character might be pregnant. Otherwise, this feels very much like a remake of De Palma's movie rather than a faithful retelling of King's book.

That's not necessarily a bad thing. I'm a King fan, but having read Carrie after seeing the '76 film, I found the novel annoying and gimmicky. De Palma went to the core of that novel, massaged its great ideas, and made something akin to a horror masterpiece, with much thanks given to the brilliant Spacek.

Director Kimberly Peirce (Boys Don't Cry) provides little reason for actually making the latest Carrie. Yes, it takes place in the present, where cellular phones and the Internet have become prevalent bullying weaponry, but much of the plot execution remains the same. In a lot of ways, this version even rips off De Palma.

Moretz (Kick-Ass) was a mere 15 years old during the filming, a little young for high school senior. While Spacek did an exemplary job playing younger than her then 26 years for the original, Moretz looks like a freshman crashing the senior prom.

Her performance is, in many ways, admirable. She captures the pain and confusion of a young girl tormented by her classmates, having received no valuable life coaching from her religious fanatic mother (played here by Julianne Moore in a role originated by the also Oscar-nominated Piper Laurie). Incidentally, Moretz just got through playing a tormented teen in this year's awful, equally bloody Kick-Ass 2.

Moore goes to a darker place with the role of Margaret White, as opposed to Laurie's campy, crazy take. This Margaret is far harder on herself (intentional cutting) and daughter, simmering with a dark, disturbing violence that makes her truly hateful. Moretz and Moore play well off each other during the movie's major confrontation scenes.

As for supporting performances, Peirce gets it right with the casting of Gabriella Wilde as the virtuous Sue Snell, the popular student who regrets bullying Carrie and asks her boyfriend, Tommy Ross (a charming Ansel Elgort), to escort Carrie to the prom, with deadly results. Judy Greer is OK as the gym teacher trying to get Carrie through everything in one piece.

On the downside, Portia Doubleday and Alex Russell are just caricatures as villains Chris Hargensen and Billy Nolan (notoriously played by the wild-eyed Nancy Allen and John Travolta in the '76 version). Their dull portrayals bring nothing new to the party. The infamous prom scene, where Carrie goes nuclear after getting doused with pig's blood, was an operatic, gloriously torturous, expertly prolonged hell in De Palma's movie. The new version feels hastily edited and glossed over with a CGI polish. It totally misses the mark, and is the final reason the remake is mediocre at best.

I suppose if you've never seen De Palma's film, the 2013 version might score higher with you. So, yeah, this review is coming to you from a guy who holds the original in high regard.

While the remake is, at times, skillfully made, its resources could have been put to better cinematic use. Like, say, an actual big screen adaptation of King's great novel, The Stand. A TV miniseries starring Molly Ringwald just won't do!

Rated NR

More by Bob Grimm

  • Deja Voodoo

    Happy Death Day is a decent enough, kinda scary mash-up of Groundhog Day and Scream
    • Oct 19, 2017
  • Runner's High

    This sequel is a gorgeous trip back to the future
    • Oct 12, 2017
  • Flights of Fancy

    The life of pilot Barry Seal seems hard to believe in American Made
    • Oct 5, 2017
  • More »


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • Pop Hit

    The Lonely Island crew delivers a music mocumentary that belongs at the top of the charts
    • Jun 9, 2016
  • Wave Not

    The Wave is better than some disaster flicks out there, but the best thing about it could be the Norwegian scenery
    • Mar 3, 2016

What others are saying (5)

Chicago Reader Music Box Massacre A 24-hour marathon of classic horror movies, vintage trailers, and personal appearances by J.R. Jones 10/08/2009
Portland Mercury First Comes the Blood Carrie and the horror of female sexuality. by Zac Pennington 10/16/2013
2 more reviews...
North Coast Journal Failed Escape Three films in a rut by John J. Bennett 10/24/2013
Arkansas Times 'Carrie,' again Moretz does well by King's classic character. by Sam Eifling 10/24/2013

The Range

TSO Presents 007-themed Show Next Weekend

Laughing Stock: Odd as Ever; Ever Laughable

The Weekly List: 24 Things To Do In Tucson This Week

More »

Latest in Cinema Feature

  • Reel Indie

    Another week of indie films is upon us, and Film Fest Tucson is taking center stage in its four-day run.
    • Oct 19, 2017
  • Deja Voodoo

    Happy Death Day is a decent enough, kinda scary mash-up of Groundhog Day and Scream
    • Oct 19, 2017
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • Fun and (Spy) Games

    Kingsman: The Golden Circle brings the franchise to America for more over-the-top espionage hijinks
    • Sep 28, 2017
  • More »

Facebook Activity

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation