Matthew Crandell 
Member since Aug 3, 2012


Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Local Chick-fil-A Viral Video Costs Tucsonan His Job

Answer to first question is Yes their "marriage" is invalid. There "domestic partnership" is valid whoever. "marriage" and the idea of marriage is far beyond a contract you idiot. It is a tradition that has been held for 1000's of years by many cultures and religions. Chris nor I are arguing the legality of the partnership or benefits gained. Simple the Ideal and the social acceptance that same sex partnership is the same as opposite sex natural marriage. This is not a constitutional issue no one is denying their constitutional rights, just don't use the word "marriage". Besides its a mostly polytheistic tradition anyway.

5 likes, 13 dislikes
Posted by Matthew Crandell on 08/03/2012 at 11:59 AM

Re: “Local Chick-fil-A Viral Video Costs Tucsonan His Job

I agree Chris, his statements have nothing to do with hate, or imply that he dislikes Homo's. He just believes that the relationship between an man and his female wife is special and sacred and is not the same as 2 men or 2 women although there's is special it is not the same. Religion aside, being a homosexual is un natural, marriage is used to signify the bond of breeding partners. In some cultures the possession of the submissive partner. There is a reason it takes a man and a women to make a child with there different but well fitting sex organs, thats natural and intentional. The other is not. Marriage should be reserved for the bond of breeding partners.

14 likes, 23 dislikes
Posted by Matthew Crandell on 08/03/2012 at 11:23 AM

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.
 

© 2018 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation