Member since Aug 31, 2009



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Compromised Conviction?

Makes you wonder what Alfbch was doing in the court room.
Just for the record the article does indicate that AJ approached the prosecutors and it was announced in open court that she was present if the family of the victims wished to have input they had their opportunity.

Posted by Lash on 08/31/2009 at 2:58 PM

Re: “Compromised Conviction?

Hmmmm.....Perhaps the person who accused AJ of being on the defense team works to the County Attorney.

This type of response is typical of those who would cloud a legitimate issue by attacking the messenger.
The evidence is clear David Nordstrom conned the prosecutor and rather than admit they were taken in by this con artist, they allowed an innocent man to be convicted. Were you aware that David tried to get the cops to give him $5000 and he would show them where the guns were hidden? Were were you aware that David used a false name when he tried to con the cops?Were you aware that he failed several polygraph tests? Were you aware that while he was in the county jail David tried to get an inmate to fake a kidnapping of his David's girlfriend so he could blame it on Scott? Were you aware that David solicited an inmate to beat him up so that he could file a lawsuit against the jail?
David is a con man and he conned his way out a murder conviction.
It is public record go check the facts in the court file. David White intentionally hid evidence that would have shot David Nordstrom's story down and he was the only valid witness who could place Scott at the crime scenes without David they had no case.
Several witnesses gave statements that David approached them and asked them to participate in armed robberies, David told them that they had to be willing to "leave no witnesses" David is a stone killer and the prosecutor made a deal with the devil just to carve another notch on his six gun
We do not need gun slingers, prosecutors are supposed to be "misters of Justice" according to our Supreme Court, they are to seek "Justice" not convictions just for the sake of convictions.
Shame on those who would trample our system of justice for vain glory and shame on those who blindly support them without knowing the facts. Herbert Spencer describes this as "contempt prior to investigation" and he says it will keep men in everlasting ignorance
Just for the record I am a part of the defense team
Chuck Laroue

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Lash on 08/31/2009 at 2:52 PM

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

© 2018 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation