Favorite

Back to the wall 

Leaders say border barrier blasting typical of feds’ neglect of tribes

Earthmoving equipment clears a path up Monument Hill in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, just west of Lukeville. Advocates and Tohono O’odham Nation officials are concerned about damage to the environment, lands sacred to indigenous people and potential impact on migrating animals.

Annabella Piunti/Cronkite News

Earthmoving equipment clears a path up Monument Hill in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, just west of Lukeville. Advocates and Tohono O’odham Nation officials are concerned about damage to the environment, lands sacred to indigenous people and potential impact on migrating animals.

Tohono O'odham nation Chairman Ned Norris said the "controlled blasting" for a border wall that will ultimately cut through his reservation is just the latest example of the federal government ignoring its duty to consult with tribes.

Federal agencies involved in border wall construction "are in violation of their own policies since meaningful consultations have not been held with the Tohono O'odham Nation," Norris said in a statement earlier this month.

The statement was in response to reports that crews have begun blasting Monument Hill in the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument – an area that includes a burial ground sacred to the Tohono O'odham.

Customs and Border Protection in a statement confirmed that contractors have started blasting in the area and said it "will continue to have an environmental monitor present during these activities as well as on-going clearing activities."

That was little comfort to critics, who noted that that federal government has exercised its "Section 102" authority to waive regulations, including consultation with tribes and environmental rules, if they could get in the way of border wall construction.

Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Tucson) said the environmental monitor "is basically collecting a check because there's nothing he or she can do" with the environmental protections waived. He complained in a January letter to the Department of Homeland Security that the Trump administration is using that authority at "an unprecedented and irresponsible rate."

But Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Prescott, defended the use of waivers in areas like Organ Pipe, which "current environmental laws make ... much more difficult for law enforcement to patrol and secure."

"I'm grateful that President Trump has decided to put American lives first and foremost, and I fully support ongoing efforts to secure our border," Gosar said in a statement released by his office Feb. 10.

The project in question is not on the Tohono O'odham reservation, which straddles the U.S.-Mexico border for 62 miles, but is on land in the adjacent national monument that is culturally significant to the tribe.

Grijalva visited the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument with Norris and other tribal members on Jan. 23, accompanied by an archeologist who identified Monument Hill as a burial ground for Apache warriors and sacred to the O'odham. The sacred sites the group visited in the region also included burial grounds, villages and ceremonial grounds, dating back as long as 10,000 years, according to a spokesperson for Grijalva's office.

Construction in the area already uncovered human remains, and since the January visit at least one area where artifacts were discovered has been bulldozed to build a road for wall construction crews. The Grijalva spokesperson called it the equivalent of digging up Arlington National Cemetery.

Norris raised many of those concerns in a Nov. 13 letter to Customs and Border Patrol seeking answers to questions that came up in an October conference call with officials from CBP, the Department of Homeland Security and the Army Corps of Engineers.

In that call, tribal officials said they learned, among other things, that construction crews were using up to 84,000 gallons on groundwater a day on wall construction and that government officials could not provide a map or schedule for the project. Norris also requested formal consultation with the tribe.

"While CBP has solicited input from the general public on the Arizona border infrastructure project, and has engaged in limited email and telephonic discussions with the Nation (primarily with staff), these actions do not constitute government-to-government consultation with the Nation's leadership," Norris wrote in November.

Consultation after border wall decisions are made does not satisfy the requirement, he wrote.

Federal agencies have policies in place requiring "meaningful consultations" with tribes "whenever an action significantly affects Indian lands, tribal rights or protected tribal resources," Norris' Monday statement said.

When there was no response to that letter, Grijalva on Jan. 7 repeated the requests for consultation in a letter to the acting secretary of Homeland Security.

As of Feb. 10, neither Norris nor Grijalva had received responses to their letters.

Grijalva said he hopes Homeland Security can "let go of their arrogance for just a minute and realize the consequences."

"You're effectively destroying a tribe's identity," Grijalva said. "As hard as they have fought to retain their identity, in one final blow, it's gone."

For more stories from Cronkite News, visit cronkitenews.azpbs.org.

More by MacKinley Lutes-Adlhoch, Cronkite News

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

Latest in Currents Feature

  • Tracking the Virus

    The future of the pandemic and why it's so hard to predict
    • Apr 2, 2020
  • Feed the Children

    Local school districts offer grab-and-go meals during statewide closure
    • Mar 26, 2020
  • More »

Most Commented On

Facebook Activity

© 2020 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation