Member since Sep 30, 2015


My emergency account!

Updated on September 30, 2015 at 2:35 PM

Links to Me

My apologies for any ill will I may have projected while my original account was inaccessible.

Recent Comments

Re: “Danehy

In the words of the late, great Peppi Marchello: "Here we go again."

I'm gonna steal your trolling style to make my points in this post. As the gifted logician and the master of English language that you are, I truly hope you, Mr. or Mrs. Intellectual Prowess, doesn't become butt-hurt. Oh, I'm sorry, I meant offended or upset.

tctw sez: "In your defense of alcohol you used two arguments to defend firearms but you didnt (sic) even realize it."

I don't have a problem with your average run of the mill firearm. If you took the time to read my posts word for word, you might have actually comprehended that I was discussing assault rifles every time. I believe in the right to bear arms, this does serve a purpose in our society. Your average citizen doesn't need a tool which can slaughter an unsuspecting group of people in a very short span of time. I have no problem with handguns or rifles, but if the rifle itself is a model which can be easily modified to be damn near fully automatic, it shouldn't be available to the general public. Period.

tctw sez: "Keep lying."

Sorry, you lose big on that one. Assault rifles only destroy. They cannot create anything, except for holes. Regarding those links you posted, all those acts of self defense or hunting could've easily been done with a simple handgun or your average hunting rifle. And I'm not sure why you included that fifth link...was that you in the picture displaying your catch of the day?

tctw sez: "A question for you is if you really think prohibition of alcohol didnt(sic) work what makes you think a prohibition of firearms will work?"

You formed this question with your word: "firearms", not my words: "assault rifles". I believe in a prohibition of firearms which can be easily modified to be almost fully-automatic, not firearms as a whole. I do believe this will work because there is a group of people out there who are not gonna be silenced. They are the surviving victims of the attacks and their friends, family and others who are empathetic to their plight; not the lobbyists, politicians and the ignorant.

tctw sez: "Prohibition was a success."

You can post all the positives that may have resulted because of it, but in no way was it a "success". I suggest that you dig deeper on this subject because if you actually think or believe an article that labels it as a "success", it only proves that you have a lot to learn about the subject. And no, I'm not gonna bother to post links that can prove this, I've already wasted too much time on you. You can use your favourite search engine and (hopefully) learn about this yourself.

I'll end this tome with giving you a small amount of credit. I was surprised when you admitted that labeling dislikers as cowardly was inappropriate. I'm a full believer of giving credit where credit is due. Although that credit doesn't go as far when you make yourself out to be superior because you don't approve of certain words. If you have trouble with some of the low-key lowbrow words which I've used, then you definitely shouldn't be visiting this site.

27 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by AZ/DC! on 03/15/2018 at 8:03 PM

Re: “Danehy

Alcohol has WAY more of a benefit to humankind than assault rifles do. It's a great social lubricant and it has aided in the production of many lives, not only the destruction of them. Sure, there are issues with abuse and there are other negative impacts, but it isn't a product that ONLY destroys, like an assault rifle. Plus, you are familiar with the Prohibition Era, right? That was an epic failure that this country, in these current times, will not attempt again.

I'm not here to scare the children. I'm not sure where you came up with that nonsense. If anything, I'm here to support them. If you've been paying attention, the young ones are making a big stink because they're sick & tired about hearing stories about mass murders in schools and other places. Heck, even Wally-World and other big box stores have stopped selling these firearms that serve no purpose for anything but widespread destruction.

If you feel as though I'm deflecting from all the irrelevant to the article information which you are so passionate about, tough titties. You started the deflection with Danehy and your irrelevant to the article postings. If you read the article, he didn't mention anything about banning the destructive tools that you feel so compelled to defend. He didn't focus on anything about the desire to save lives. The article focuses on the stupid things said in the aftermath of yet another school massacre. You devoted your first post to that, then you went off on a tangent with your follow-up posts. Then, I'm guessing, you became offended because you received some dislikes. That made you butt-hurt because it's so easy to hit the "thumbs down' (sic) button and you didn't care much for "Lots of people out there that give thumbs down but are too cowardly to actually write something." Well, I responded to you because I felt that not only was that a pathetic post, it was also displaying ignorance as to why you weren't receiving any sort of debate attached to all those "cowardly" dislikes you were receiving.

Yes, I admit it, I got sucked in by the bait which was set out by a troll.

42 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by AZ/DC! on 03/12/2018 at 9:27 PM

Re: “Danehy

Thanks tctw, I know it was well reasoned. Too bad you can't follow suit.

Your pointless defense of a tool that does nothing but destroy is something else. You must have a whole lotta love for these things to keep coming back with your irrelevant to the article bullshit. My guess is that you are compensating for a lack of something, be it physical or mental.

If you can't understand that everything you are comparing these weapons to has a benefit to mankind which has outweighed the negative aspects, then there is absolutely no hope for you. There is no benefit to mankind with assault rifles, unless you consider needless destruction beneficial.

So, in your pointless words: "Keep closing your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, stomp your feet on the ground, keep repeating I am right, you are wrong, and"...keep on deflecting from the article.

As I've said before, it is so much less painful to give a thumbs down to a troll than it is to feed them. Now scoot, I'm out of troll chow for you. You're worse than a squirrel.

38 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by AZ/DC! on 03/09/2018 at 8:08 PM

Re: “Danehy

See tctw, this is exactly what I meant when I mentioned that giving your irrelevant to the article postings a "thumbs down' (sic) was much less painful than feeding a troll.

When a troll such as yourself is fed, you just keep coming back with more irrelevant bullshit. You also take so much pride in yourself and what you type that you don't even realise how moronic your postings actually are. You can't help yourself because you feel as if you're in the spotlight.

Once again, if you can't post anything that's relevant to the article, just crawl back into that sewer hole of yours and don't return because I will not be feeding you the troll chow anymore.

69 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by AZ/DC! on 03/07/2018 at 7:26 PM

Re: “Danehy

No, a more ignorant statement would not be difficult to make. Your post above is chock full of them. Crawl back into your hole and seal the lid.

52 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by AZ/DC! on 03/06/2018 at 7:52 PM

Re: “Danehy

It's not a matter of being cowardly tctw, it's the fact that most people don't want to feed a troll. It's less painful to give you a thumbs down than it is to see you keep coming back with your flimsy comparisons.

But since I'm here, I'll give you my #1 reason for banning any weapon that only serves the purpose of mass destruction:

You can't slaughter as many as 50 people or more in a matter of minutes with a bottle of scotch.

The information you present is irrelevant to assault rifles and the damage they can cause in a very small amount of time.

69 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by AZ/DC! on 03/04/2018 at 10:14 PM

Re: “The Skinny

Thomas Williams:

News Flash!

YOU are probably more corrupt than Obama and I read your post which was a major disservice.

You failed. Please don't try again.

34 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by AZ/DC! on 02/08/2018 at 8:57 AM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

© 2018 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation