Shane J Dyer 
Member since Dec 9, 2010



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Mailbag

I should note that my original comment to the People in Power noted that, for deficit reduction purposes, Social Security--a separate trust fund currently running a surplus--was not budgetarily rrelevant, though for space purposes I neglected to make that clear.

The current proposal from the O-man might make the Social Security shortfall come earlier than 2037, but it's absurd to pretend that gutting Social Security benefits should be a priority, and to the extent that editing change implied any such acquiescence with that travesty on my part, it should be ignored.

Posted by Shane J Dyer on 12/09/2010 at 12:17 PM

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

© 2020 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation