Narrow Search

Comment Archives: stories: Today

Re: “Vintage Vinyl

Wow. Seriously good vocals. Some youtubing found the excellent "If I Were You", too.

Posted by Firsttimecaller on 05/23/2017 at 7:15 PM

Re: “Southwest East Coast

Was that Erv Silverstein? Great story.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Betty J on 05/23/2017 at 4:41 PM

Re: “Because of Results-Based Funding, 15 to 17 Percent of Schools Will Get "A" Grades, Down From 30 Percent. Here's Why That's Important

Just keep saying it over and over and over again, David.

WELFARE FOR THE RICH!!!
WELFARE FOR THE RICH!!!
WELFARE FOR THE RICH!!!

Perhaps, no matter how deliberately misleading, how discriminatory, and how biased your "take" on education policy is, some gullible members of your audience who don't bother to analyze your arguments will believe you just because they'll figure if you're confident enough to repeat it in blog after sad blog, it must be true.

Vouchers make per-pupil funding that could previously be applied only in public district and public charter schools "portable." In most cases, they are used to extend the state's support of K-12 education to high functioning institutions that are entirely worthy of public investment. That this support was previously offered in a discriminatory fashion to families willing to utilize certain institutions, but not to families who prefer to use other institutions (institutions which, in many cases, deliver higher quality academic instruction than the institutions that were publicly funded) is an injustice that needed to be corrected.

As for the "more funding to higher performing schools," the way it has been structured is problematic. But, if we're going to be completely honest, we'd have to acknowledge that this is also highly problematic: the notion that families that have chosen to structure their lives to provide the maximal amount of support to their children at home should be taxed to install expensive services in schools that compensate for other families' unwillingness or inability to do so. If, for example, a family chooses to keep one parent at home to support children's growth and development, they are making a choice -- extremely costly to themselves in terms of total family income -- that, if the at-home parent's time is appropriately allocated to support the children, makes the job of educating those children easier and less expensive for the school that child attends. Should the taxes this family pays into the system be used to provide supplementary services for children of families with two parents working full time, who need after-care and perhaps tutoring support that a family with one parent at home does not need?

Education policy questions are complicated, much more so than simplistic analyses, tag phrases like "WELFARE FOR THE RICH!!!," and vulgar appeals to emotion and / or prejudice make them out to be.

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Still too simplistic. on 05/23/2017 at 4:26 PM

Re: “Smoke Sessions

It appears so much need to be pandered too, hate we first must show who and what we dislike, our long term disgust must be stated before any work to make whats right is done.

I guess I missed the boat again. I didn't understand that boat only sailed to the destination of intolerance. In order to get passage one needs to disassociate and insult others. Then to go on board and work to get other on board that have not agreed in the past. This is working wonderfully a ship of fools my grandmother said.

Posted by carpet baggers on 05/23/2017 at 11:06 AM

Re: “Because of Results-Based Funding, 15 to 17 Percent of Schools Will Get "A" Grades, Down From 30 Percent. Here's Why That's Important

We should send the worst schools all the education money and just buy Chinese junk. Then we could stop this constant argument over who gets to hold all the education money. It is obvious it should be you.

1 like, 7 dislikes
Posted by Marilyn Tucson on 05/23/2017 at 10:07 AM

Re: “A 'Fat Cat Tax'?

That worked for them in the past but the public has wised up to it. This is usually when they switch to name calling. They must be teaching Cloward-Piven at the U of A.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy

1 like, 4 dislikes
Posted by Love it or leave it on 05/23/2017 at 10:05 AM

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation