Narrow Search

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: Last 30 Days

Re: “The Skinny

Imma maroon!

6 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by CW13KnowNothing on 10/02/2017 at 8:59 AM

Re: “Danehy

Azmom and ContemptuousWacko13 obviously don't think at all.

12 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by So Tired of Conservative Assholes on 10/02/2017 at 8:37 AM

Re: “Sinema's In: Democratic Congresswoman Joins Race for Sen. Jeff Flake's Seat

This is so typical of Schumer getting the worst Democrat in the House to run for the Senate. Sinema is not a Democrat, a progressive, or a leader. She has the lowest Progressive Punch score among House Democrats & is owned by Wall Street. She has voted against many efforts to rein in Wall Street excesses including supporting decimating the CFPB. The only Democratic policies she seems so support are those that support the LGBT community. Sinema more of a self-interested calculating careerist like Debbie Wasserman Schultz, than someone who wants to serve and improve her country or Arizona.

This does not bode well for the Arizona Senate race. There were three very electable Progressive Senate candidates: Alan Grayson in Florida, Joe Sestak in Pennsylvania, and P. G. Sittenfeld in Ohio. Well, Schumer got his marching orders from Wall Street and recruited three awful primary candidates. Former Republican Patrick Murphy in Florida, Conservadem Katie McGinty in Pennsylvania, and way past his prime Ted Strickland in Ohio. Needless to day all three results of Schumers meddling lost their races; which is why McConnell is still Majority Leader and and the reactionary garbage known as Gorsuch instead of Merrick Garland sits on the Supreme Court.

Surely the Arizona Democratic Party can do better?

9 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Wileybud on 10/01/2017 at 7:40 AM

Re: “Sports Scandal Rocks UA Basketball Program

just pay the players already, in terms of revenue to the U of A, the cachet of having a big time mens BB program in Tucson making season tickets more expensive than most broadway plays, they deserve it. The old school mantra of they get a free education, just doesn't make sense with billions in TV contracts in play.
Student athletes add value to the school and to the community, pay all scholarship players, whatever the market determines they are worth!

0 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by laddderflappy on 09/30/2017 at 10:04 PM

Re: “Business Leaders Say, Raise Taxes to Fund Schools

Arizona Rural Schools Association, representing 100 districts serving more than 100,000 students in every county have formally asked the leaders of Arizona's business community to take up the challenge. Steps have been taken to address the needs of our education system, but they don't fully address the needs and if something isn't done to address the end of the current 6/10ths sales tax the future of education in Arizona looks very grim.

Posted by SERickert on 09/30/2017 at 9:14 PM

Re: “Danehy

It's interesting - a friend has for years claimed that throwing money at the problem will not help. Now that there are private schools and vouchers, he says he's 'willing to try anything'. Especially throwing money at the problem.

12 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by W Corvi on 09/30/2017 at 12:56 AM

Re: “Danehy

Think nothing of it Azmom. I've been around here a long time, you get used to it. I could praise the virtues of Mother Teresa and people would hit dislike. And don't ask these people to think on their own. If Tommy says it, that's good enough for them.

5 likes, 20 dislikes
Posted by CW13 on 09/30/2017 at 12:19 AM

Re: “Have a Little Faith

Beautifully written and makes me feel hopeful.

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Carlos Torres on 09/29/2017 at 5:31 PM

Re: “Catalina Foothills Districts Earns Bragging Rights With Its AzMERIT Scores (Or Maybe Not)

I'll be interested to see what David replies -- if he replies. In the meantime perhaps another commenter can add a few thoughts on money and test scores.

High parental income does not cause high test scores. It enables the possibility of higher test scores, when the money is applied in the right way. (Example: when a wealthy family where both parents work 70-hour a week jobs employs a nanny who does not know how to provide the right kind of educational support in the home, their money will not cause their children to have the highest possible test scores those children are capable of having. If, however, they hire a retired teacher who provides the right kind of educational enrichment and support, their money may enable (but not CAUSE) higher test scores -- if, that is (to add another significant variable) their children are willing to apply effort in school. In a poor family, both parents may have to work full time to pay rent and utilities and there may not be enough extra left over to secure the optimal kind of child care for the hours when children are not in school.)

Similarly, public funds allocated to a school district can enable but do not cause higher test scores. They will enable higher scores only if the money is applied in the right way. It is easier in wealthier districts where the families have the means to provide maximal educational support in the home. But let's look at poorer districts, where students come to school with more needs unmet and where helping them learn is harder: if desegregation and / or Title 1 funds are applied to ensure that every classroom in neighborhoods with high concentrations of lower-SES and / or minority families has a qualified teacher in it rather than to build a swimming pool or to add vaguely described "support" positions that have no clear function in increasing the quality of education delivered to students (two examples from the long and baffling history of TUSD's management of its funding supplements), increased funds may have a chance of enabling better test scores.

To sum it up: what enables (not CAUSES) maximal student success is complex and involves many variables, which would include at a bare minimum: 1) sufficient funding at home and in the school system, 2) the right kind of support in the home either from parents or from supplementary care they hire and fully qualified faculty in the schools, 3) intent on the part of school governance and administration to apply funds they control for STUDENT benefit, and 4) some level of oversight both from an active, engaged, knowledgeable citizenry and from higher level authorities within the state's educational system. Then there are always the variables of student motivation and application of effort, without which no amount of resource allocation and responsible oversight can do any good.

Some of the variables needed for maximal student success are missing throughout Arizona and others are missing in some of the institutions in this region. One political party whines constantly about what is missing statewide while ignoring or cloaking the local problems and the other denies the reality of statewide problems while failing to use the means at its disposal (state level institutions and governance) to identify and treat the regional problems.

8 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by It's complicated, and both party ideologies get it wrong. on 09/29/2017 at 2:26 PM

Re: “Have a Little Faith

Peggy, there are a good 8 or 10 churches in Tucson who would love to welcome your daughter and granddaughter. We're very fortunate in that regard. Mine - Grace St. Paul's Episcopal - is one of them. But like I say, there are many!

2 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by bruzintuc on 09/29/2017 at 11:33 AM

Re: “Catalina Foothills Districts Earns Bragging Rights With Its AzMERIT Scores (Or Maybe Not)

David, how, in your view, does high parental income cause higher student test scores? The typical answer I get from defenders of the public education industry is that schools in wealthier districts are better funded. But if that's the explanation, the relevant metric ought to be per pupil instructional spending, right? But the state auditor report that you cited in your March, 2016 article on this subject (https://www.azauditor.gov/sites/default/fi…) shows that in 2015, TUSD spent $4005 per student on instruction, whereas Cat Foothills spent LESS: $3792 per pupil.

So, what's the causation, in your view?

9 likes, 11 dislikes
Posted by Nathan K on 09/29/2017 at 10:49 AM

Re: “Check-in Time

This building rivals the Unisource structure for uninspiring design.
Or more bluntly - ugliness.

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by SonoranWinds on 09/29/2017 at 9:41 AM

Re: “Ask a Mexican!

Eso! Gustavo!

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by icecld51 on 09/29/2017 at 9:02 AM

Re: “Danehy

Why do you dislike my comments??? Because you would rather agree with his rhetoric than actually think about the possible positive affects good charter schools may have?

6 likes, 22 dislikes
Posted by Azmom on 09/29/2017 at 8:06 AM

Re: “Congressman in Cuffs

MY, my, my, Tucson Weekly:

Regarding Open Border Policy: What a CHANGE public sentiment from 2006, when the ENTIRE Tucson establishment was "pro-raza, cheap Mexican labor!"

Maybe its time for an objective article on this issue?

1 like, 5 dislikes
Posted by KitWarden on 09/29/2017 at 7:14 AM

Re: “Congressman in Cuffs

Raul the Fool strikes again. Makes you REAL proud to be an Arizonan. Probably most of you aren't from N.Y.C. ,So, you've never heard of the Tombs. The Manhattan House of Detention. I would have loved if there was a mix-up with the paper work and they stuck Raul's ass in there for a week !!

2 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by CW13 on 09/29/2017 at 6:41 AM

Re: “Catalina Foothills Districts Earns Bragging Rights With Its AzMERIT Scores (Or Maybe Not)

"Just like in real estate, Cat Foothills' success is all about location, location, location."

Catalina Foothills High must be built on magic dirt. Maybe we could load up a truck or two of it and send it down to Tucson High. That should help.

2 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by Nathan K on 09/28/2017 at 8:13 PM

Re: “Catalina Foothills Districts Earns Bragging Rights With Its AzMERIT Scores (Or Maybe Not)

Where's the punchline, David? You know what it is, right? SES / home values and parent education levels in the neighborhoods surrounding those two schools and SES and parent education levels of many if not all of those who open enroll. If TUSD schools were integrated by SES and parent education levels, would these two schools be the stand-outs they are?

So what are you trying to highlight, TUSD's chronic failures to integrate? Its decades-long persistence in maintaining enclave schools where people who live in the right neighborhoods can get services superior to what is available even in the wealthy Catalina Foothills school district, while people who live on the South and West sides of TUSD distinctly do NOT get those test scores -- or the kind of staff and investment available in those schools -- out of TUSD? How about making one of your fabulous graphs showing teacher vacancy rates at Fruchthendler and Sam Hughes vs. south and west side TUSD schools or average years of experience of teaching staff in Fruchthendler and Sam Hughes VS. south and west side schools? Or graphs showing differences in supplementary private investment and tax credit investment in those schools vs. other schools in TUSD?

I really don't understand the point you're trying to make here. Is it that even failing TUSD can do well teaching rich kids whose parents voluntarily invest in their schools, or is it that there are some significant failures of justice in resource allocation in TUSD? Or both?

Do tell.

14 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by What's the moral of the story here? on 09/28/2017 at 1:26 PM

Re: “Cinema Clips: First They Killed My Father: A Daughter of Cambodia Remembers

It is Amazing!! tear-jerker, slice of life, extraordinary story. 10/10 i would give this movie!

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by ACER on 09/28/2017 at 12:41 PM

Re: “Sports Scandal Rocks UA Basketball Program

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME

Shocked I say.....

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Jim on 09/28/2017 at 12:14 PM

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation