Narrow Search

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: Last 7 Days

Re: “A UA Prof Chimes In on the 'Freedom Center'

Eisenhower became President of Columbia after using his diplomatic skills to chart victory in Europe. He had a vision of facilitating intellectual and research pursuits. He came out saying all a college President did was grub for money fulltime. Now most universities do the same thing, who#es for money. Football games are 4 hours long at midnight grubbing for TV money. Even coal waste pile money is acceptable in the pursuit of libertarian, corporate dictatorships. Of course objective research on societal effects of Ayn Randism is impossible in the Freedom Academy.

19 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Frances Perkins on 11/12/2017 at 7:46 PM

Re: “A UA Prof Chimes In on the 'Freedom Center'

Yeah that general welfare thinggee is working out just fine isn't it?

4 likes, 16 dislikes
Posted by Jonathon K on 11/12/2017 at 6:38 AM

Re: “A UA Prof Chimes In on the 'Freedom Center'

If pushed to the limit, libertarianism is autocracy. The Koch's philosophy of greed is convincing Americans to dispense with a government that promotes the general welfare of its people and replace it with one that re-establishes feudalism. Their self-indulgent excuses for greed are taking over educational institutions across the country, from Arizona to FSU to GMU and many points in between. I'm sorry but not surprised to learn that they have infected UA like they have my own UVA.

23 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by poddar1 on 11/12/2017 at 5:45 AM

Re: “A UA Prof Chimes In on the 'Freedom Center'

Intellectual diversity is a good thing. UA's Economics dept includes liberals, conservatives,and libertarians. Let's have that dept rather than the Philosophy dept teach high school economics. The Phil 101 course is problematic because it lacks intellectual diversity. And for many students it will be their only exposure to economics. Don't they deserve to hear the range of viewpoints in contemporary economics? Instead students are being given only the Koch view.

21 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Dianne Horgan on 11/11/2017 at 8:28 PM

Re: “A UA Prof Chimes In on the 'Freedom Center'

Let's review again. How did the Koch brothers become involved in public policy? In the 1930's their father went to Russia to help them build refineries with the very latest technology and efficiency. As he worked there he formed friendships with many communists and then three events happened - first he observed the 80% collapse of economic production under communism and its horrific impact on ordinary families, then he observed the purges, first his friends being expelled from the communist party and their loss of jobs and then their murders.

Then, he was assigned a "handler" who laid out in detail their plans to do the same thing in the United States. They had to murder millions to gain acceptance of their hateful system in Russia and they were planning to do the same thing in the United States all the way until Reagan's economic results and star wars program convinced them that communism was irretrievably inferior to capitalism and they gave up.

The ultimate irony is that Koch industries is set up under a communistic system, a healthy positive one, not the hateful thing that Marx designed. In Koch industries, supervisors and managers are regarded as servants and evaluated by their subordinates. They also view their companies as servants to their customers measuring customer satisfaction with every single service and product.

Their intellectual approach works, over 100,000 people have chosen to work for them, one of the 50 largest empires in the United States.

By comparison, our university system is a totally corrupt arteriosclerotic pile of dung and the University of Arizona represents the worst of it. They can't even comprehend that their students are their customers- they totally reject measuring the percentage of students rating their education excellent, a number less than 25%, the typical university student shows no cognitive gains after two years of college and there is no evidence that the UofA is any better.

The idea that professors would evaluate Deans would never be considered. The idea that the presidents would be rewarded for the percentage of students rating their education incredibly great would be regarded as completely culturally bizarre.

No wonder that they panic at the idea that this little breath of fresh air and innovations, Koch centers would enter their intellectually corrupt and sclerotic establishment.

Time for another enlightenment.

8 likes, 23 dislikes
Posted by jhuppent@hotmail.com on 11/11/2017 at 8:10 AM

Re: “Prop. 204: Planting Preschools in Daycare Deserts

Your partner for a credit fast, sure and adapted to your needs. Your partner on a daily basis.
We are proud to help people from all walks of life, no matter what their financial situation might be.
https://www.carroncredits.com/en/index.html

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Fernand carron on 11/11/2017 at 5:48 AM

Re: “The Weekly Tate: Khalil Tate and Arizona Chomping at the Bit to Host Oregon State

The University of Arizona now wants to sell Alcohol at the McKale Center and the Arizona Stadium; yet another example of the focus of this "University"; ($$$$$) and a complete disregard for the Health and Safety of those on Campus during these University sponsored Bacchanalias; as well as those Driving from these Bacchanalias "under the influence". It will also encourage the use of Alcohol by under age Students.

For Health and Saftey reasons these efforts to obtain Licenses for the Sale of Alcohol should be rejected!!! The Faculty Senate at the UofA must weight in on this issue and the current situation in the UofA Athletic Program.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Francis Saitta on 11/11/2017 at 5:47 AM

Re: “The Weekly Take: DeAndre Ayton leads Arizona into tonight's season opener against NAU

The Athletic Program at the University of Arizona, as with other Universities in this Country, creates the environment for Corruption that we are currently witnessing. This is Big Business!!... providing millions of dollars for the University and, as well, are Feeder Programs for Professional Sports. The Athletic Programs, as such, must be Dismantled and Restructured.

The University, Board of Regents and University Administration, kowtows to Alumni that support the Athletic Programs as they current exist. Why?...the $$$$$ that the "donate"....and...their Identity as a Person is inextricably linked to these Athletic Programs providing an opportunity to participate in Home Game "tailgating"...a euphemism for a University sponsored Bacchanalia!

It remain to be seen, if the new UofA President, Dr. Bobby Robins, has the Interest, Courage, and Clout to Dismantle and Restructure the Athletic Program. The University is First and Foremost an Academic Institution...NOT a Feeder Institution for Professional Sports!!!

7 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Francis Saitta on 11/11/2017 at 5:39 AM

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation