Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range
    • From:

      To:


Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: The Range: The Tucson Weekly's Daily Dispatch

Re: “'Repeal and Replace' Cuts Schools' Medicaid Funding

http://thedevelopmentofrome.weebly.com/roman-tripartite-government.html

If this had been in place Clinton couldn't have pardoned the pedophiles and Obama couldn't release all the drug dealers.

he might be on to something.

1 like, 4 dislikes
Posted by Wally World on 06/23/2017 at 3:58 PM

Re: “'Repeal and Replace' Cuts Schools' Medicaid Funding

I know Exactly what he Means.

1 like, 3 dislikes
Posted by The Russians Hacked My Email Again on 06/23/2017 at 2:03 PM

Re: “'Repeal and Replace' Cuts Schools' Medicaid Funding

Tripartite Co-Equal Constitutional Political System ??!! Try saying that 3 times. I'm impressed. You're still a moron but, one who uses big words. I love how our President gnaws at your gut and you can't do zilch about it. Question. I blew up your picture. Just what is that thing your pointing at? If your mind was in the gutter like mine....

0 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by CW13 on 06/23/2017 at 1:14 PM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

Steve was this you?

https://casetext.com/case/longariello-v-phoenix-union-high-school-district-3

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Ellen D on 06/23/2017 at 12:02 PM

Re: “'Repeal and Replace' Cuts Schools' Medicaid Funding

Voters must participate in the Electoral Process and " Boot" the Republicans out of the US House of Representatives and Senate; locally this means Martha McSally and Jeff Flake. With this in place, we might have a chance to "boot" their Inveterate Lying Leader...Donald Trump!!!!. He acts as a Dictator which No understanding of our Tripartite Co-Equal Constitutional Political System. He represents a Serious Threat to our Social System, our Constitutionally Protected Freedoms and, as well, a Serious Threat to our National Security.

Perhaps as well, the Congressional Investigations currently under way, will uncover evidence of His/His Minions collaboration with his Friend and Mentor Putin, to justify his removal from Office.

5 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Francis Saitta on 06/23/2017 at 11:57 AM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

Steve Longariello
5/15/2017 2:22 PM MST


Steve Longariello

5/14/2017 2:52 PM MST

The real problem in Arizona is the silent war going on between the locals and the many people who are moving to Arizona from other states. The Gov. of AZ will never admit to this. So I'll fill ya in.
Many of the people coming to live in Arizona are bigger than and more qualified, and educated than the typical Arizonian. This has outraged the locals who can not compete. Because of this the locals are attacking the out of state people and their efforts to live in Arizona. They are trying to get them to leave.
I have seen this with respect to all human matters in Arizona. Arizonians have become a nasty people with no respect for the law. Their administrators have permitted abuse of out of state children (you all remember that one) as well as other human abuses in all aspects of law and justice.
The teacher shortage in Arizona was caused by the locals in an effort to get the out of state people to leave. After the teachers left the Arizonians found the money for hiring teachers but claimed that they could not find qualified teachers. So what they did was take the money and hire unqualified locals
to cover the classroom.
IF YOU MOVED TO ARIZONA FROM ANOTHER STATE AND HAVE CHILDREN-DON'T SEND THEM TO SCHOOL. YOU WILL LATER REGRET IT. INSTEAD, BAND TOGETHER AND DEMAMD THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TAKE OVER THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
IF YOU ARE A TEACHER FROM ANOTHER STATE, DON'T COME TO TEACH IN ARIZONA UNTIL FEDS TAKE OVER EDUCATION SYSTEM IN ARIZONA. YOU WILL ALSO REGRET IT.
Don't let these nasty little Neanderthals interfere with your child's right to an appropriate education.
Steve J. Longariello

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Steve Longariello on 06/23/2017 at 11:01 AM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

Steve Longariello
5/15/2017 2:22 PM MST

The real problem in Arizona is the silent war going on between the locals and the many people who are moving to Arizona from other states. The Gov. of AZ will never admit to this. So I'll fill ya in.
Many of the people coming to live in Arizona are bigger than and more qualified, and educated than the typical Arizonian. This has outraged the locals who can not compete. Because of this the locals are attacking the out of state people and their efforts to live in Arizona. They are trying to get them to leave.
I have seen this with respect to all human matters in Arizona. Arizonians have become a nasty people with no respect for the law. Their administrators have permitted abuse of out of state children (you all remember that one) as well as other human abuses in all aspects of law and justice.
The teacher shortage in Arizona was caused by the locals in an effort to get the out of state people to leave. After the teachers left the Arizonians found the money for hiring teachers but claimed that they could not find qualified teachers. So what they did was take the money and hire unqualified locals
to cover the classroom.
IF YOU MOVED TO ARIZONA FROM ANOTHER STATE AND HAVE CHILDREN-DON'T SEND THEM TO SCHOOL. YOU WILL LATER REGRET IT. INSTEAD, BAND TOGETHER AND DEMAMD THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TAKE OVER THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
IF YOU ARE A TEACHER FROM ANOTHER STATE, DON'T COME TO TEACH IN ARIZONA UNTIL FEDS TAKE OVER EDUCATION SYSTEM IN ARIZONA. YOU WILL ALSO REGRET IT.
Don't let these nasty little Neanderthals interfere with your child's right to an appropriate education.
Steve J. Longariello

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Steve Longariello on 06/23/2017 at 11:00 AM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

Huppenthal: could you please explain why, if the legislature increased overall funding to schools significantly, it would not be possible for districts to increase BOTH the average salary and the shortage salary?

While overall funding remains this low, they can only increase "average" salaries at the expense of "novice" salaries, or vice-versa.

Would you like them to lower salaries for experienced teachers in the schools so salaries for inexperienced (and now, insufficiently qualified) novices who may not choose to remain in the profession long-term can be increased?

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Questions for Huppenthal on 06/23/2017 at 10:20 AM

Re: “'Repeal and Replace' Cuts Schools' Medicaid Funding

Wait for the real facts, or this could happen to you. People are pushing themselves to insanity.

http://fox42kptm.com/news/local/nebraska-democratic-party-official-ousted-after-controversial-audio-recording-surfaces.

1 like, 5 dislikes
Posted by Tammy Parsone on 06/23/2017 at 10:09 AM

Re: “Cinema Clips: War Machine

ladderflappy:

Shut up!

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Gene Simmons of THE Hottest Band in the Land...KISS! on 06/23/2017 at 9:11 AM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

Education is basically a thorn in the sides of most Republicans because their opinions matter more than science or mathematics. If the curriculum for Arizona schools was based strictly on biblical principles the legislature would be pouring money into the teaching profession like it was manna from heaven. The students wouldn't learn anything but the legislature could defend their position by saying they are doing everything they can to make education in Arizona worthwhile.

9 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Beneal Good on 06/23/2017 at 7:46 AM

Re: “Cinema Clips: War Machine

your movie judgement shows a lack of education and experience of how the upper echelon of the american military performs since Dubya. Do some more homework and maybe the intention of this movie will be more apparent.

1 like, 4 dislikes
Posted by laddderflappy on 06/23/2017 at 7:26 AM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

The average teacher salary in Arizona is $47,000 per year. The shortage salary is $32,000 per year. There wouldn't be any shortage of teachers at all if you could open that average salary up. However, the legislature can only change the average salary. It can't change the shortage salary at all, only the districts can do that.

Paradoxically, it is quite possible that an increase in the average salary would result in a reduction of the shortage salary. Systems do that when rewarded for certain behaviors.

5 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by jhuppent@hotmail.com on 06/22/2017 at 6:15 PM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

Are you unwilling to let the voters have their say? There is so much more to the equation than the simplistic statement that "a strong public schools create a vibrant economy." In fact the U of A has proven just the opposite. Most that get a good education leave Tucson for better pay and more amenities.

Like fully paved streets.

6 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by What is this town thinking? on 06/22/2017 at 4:22 PM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

This state has had a Republican legislature for the last 24 yrs, and a Republican governor for 20 out of the last 26 yrs. Public education is not a priority for them, and the GOP here in AZ is not smart enough to figure out that strong public schools help create a vibrant economy and attract business. The voters keep sending the same kind of people to the legislature, so unless those people change, nothing will change.

26 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Pima Mujer on 06/22/2017 at 4:09 PM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

I think this is a worthy experiment, and we should probably give it time to play out before declaring failure. The basic problem is that teaching pays so much less than, say, engineering, so I have difficulty understanding why someone who had the test scores to be admitted to and worked hard to successfully complete an engineering programming would want to accept so much less pay than their market value. I might see people do that for lifestyle reasons, or as a sort of semi-retirement, but not right out of school with student loans to pay back.

Perhaps the solution to Arizona's teacher shortage is to start bringing in immigrant teachers on H-1B visas (at least for STEM fields). There may just not be enough Americans to fill these jobs. Accessing a deep pool of immigrant teaching labor would also help level the balance of power with the teacher unions.

7 likes, 13 dislikes
Posted by Nathan K on 06/22/2017 at 2:46 PM

Re: “How's the New 'Anyone Can Teach in Arizona' Law Working Out So Far?

I suppose they can claim that supposedly "qualified" college graduates who can't get jobs in their fields can now go to work teaching, thereby being a full-employment program for the state. Fat chance!

7 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by gcb1 on 06/22/2017 at 2:35 PM

Re: “Laughing Stock: Where Does Comedy Come From?

I just read about another local restaurant that is closing. The owner said it was due in part to slow times but the increase in minimum wage finished them off. Is that part of this problem also? This is no laughing matter.

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Coulrophobia Is Real on 06/22/2017 at 12:13 PM

Re: “Carpe Diem Charters Are Failing to Seize the Day, Or the Students

I see the League of Women Voters of Arizona has signed on as a supporter of the misleadingly titled "Save Our Schools" campaign:
http://saveourschoolsarizona.org/pages/87

Another sad sign that the AZ League, in spite of its professed concern with EQUITY, doesn't actually know what the term means and / or is led by people who haven't the faintest clue what is going on at the ground level in TUSD.

I detect the influence of some of our local "Supporters of Public Ed." They may be able to mislead the Board of the League of Women Voters of AZ by pouting and telling fairy tales about financially transparent, democratically controlled and uniformly deserving public school districts whose only obstacle to delivering "GREAT EDUCATION to EVERYONE !" is lack of funds, but a lot of people locally see through campaigns based on the false notion of public school districts as bastions of an "EQUITY" that has never existed and will never begin to exist in districts like TUSD, even if funding is increased.

Equity cannot begin to exist in TUSD in part because some of our better known "Supporters of Public Ed" don't care to advocate for it. They remain silent when the factual findings of people like Sylvia Campoy are disparaged by the district's representatives. They remain silent when the Superintendent re-allocates millions of dollars from improving services to underserved students to paying three different sets of expensive law firms to pick fights with the desegregation judge. They remain silent when their friends on the TUSD Board vote twice in support of a patently inequitable plan to funnel students directly from wealthy-neighborhood-Fruchthendler-Elementary to wealthy-neighborhood-Sabino-High-School, bypassing a middle school where Fruchthendler children might have to attend school with (shudder) less privileged TUSD students.

Did I miss the "Supporters of Public Ed"'s conspicuous advocacy on these topics, David Safier? If so, please send me a link to where I can see these public-spirited, compassionate campaigners using their influence in the community to defend EQUITY in TUSD.

(In general, I will say that it's best when education policy analysis and education policy initiatives are created by people who've taken the time and trouble to study for a few years under the tutelage of experts in education and / or education policy. Right now the policy initiatives produced by our local "Supporters of Public Schools!" are not, and while they continue to market their own particular brand of hypocrisy and ignorance to the electorate, what they are actually doing is a lot of damage to the credibility of and soundness of management in public schools in this state.)

6 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by P.S. on "Supporters of Public Ed!" and EQUITY. on 06/22/2017 at 11:39 AM

Re: “Carpe Diem Charters Are Failing to Seize the Day, Or the Students

Does a public school district like TUSD serve and promote EQUITY? Should we do what "Supporters of Public Schools" (Ann Eve Pedersen, Jen Darland, etc.) ask, oppose SB1431 and, by so doing, ensure that people who want to transfer out of some of the district's lower performing schools and enroll their children in private schools do not have the economic means necessary to do so?

Consider these things observed by constituents with students enrolled in TUSD:

1. Parents at both Sam Hughes and Fruchthendler Elementary Schools, the schools which Ann Eve Pedersen's and Jen Darland's families used, raised private money and tax credit funds and used the funds to significantly augment the resources available to students enrolled in those schools, creating conditions quite different from what might be available to students attending, for example, TUSD schools in less affluent neighborhoods on the SW side. Parents not only raised the funds, which is relatively easy in affluent neighborhoods like the neighborhoods surrounding those schools, they got TUSD central, in spite of its professed concerns with "EQUITY" to permit them to apply their funds in areas where they wanted them applied, including:

Hughes: Playground equipment, a piano, fine arts programming, a librarian, a first grade teacher, classroom aides, project-based-learning professional development and curricular support, a counselor, a P.E. Teacher, a chess teacher, reading specialists, 36 computers

Fruchthendler (a partial list, including only staff positions funded) PE coach, track coach , Spanish teacher, computer teacher, Kinder-2nd grade tutor, 3rd -5th grade tutor

On the topic of how that permission was obtained, one of the well-connected fundraisers involved with the Hughes efforts gave the impression that part of the trick was supporting campaigns "the district" was running by knocking on doors and persuading constituents to vote for them. Were these just campaigns for bonds and overrides (and, more recently, perhaps for the dubious Ducey-concocted initiative, Prop 123), or were they also political campaigns supporting certain candidates for the district's Governing Board? Who knows -- though it's interesting to note that Ann Eve Pedersen was Jen Darland's campaign manager when she ran for the TUSD Board in 2014. Darland is a Democrat who gave the appearance during her campaign of being closely associated with sitting Board members Adelita Grijalva and Kristel Foster. During Darland's campaign, questions were raised about whether Pedersen had improperly used a district employee e-mail contact list to invite people to a Darland campaign event at her home.
http://tucson.com/news/local/education/multiple-campaign-violations-alleged-in-tusd-board-race/article_5686d533-8c07-5c28-951a-0651164dba82.html

2. Jen Darland's family, like former Superintendent HT Sanchez's family, used TUSD's Fruchthendler Elementary. Not just once but twice during the 2013-2016 period when the TUSD Board was controlled by the majority Grijalva-Foster-Juarez, proposals were passed by the TUSD Board that would create a pipeline directly from Fruchthendler Elementary to Sabino High School, allowing Fruchthendler parents to bypass Magee Middle school, a middle school serving a more socio-economically diverse population than the Fruchthendler neighborhood. Evidently Magee was good enough for other TUSD students, but not good enough for the friends, neighbors and classmates of the children of Ms. Darland and Dr. Sanchez. The desegregation authority twice vetoed the plan as one that would increase inequity in the district. No doubt the desire to install the Fruchthendler-Sabino direct feed pipeline was one more reason the Superintendent and Board majority 2013-2016 used desegregation funds -- the main purpose of which should be to improve services to underserved students -- to pay expensive lawyers to try to resolve the desegregation case and get out from under court oversight. If they could get rid of oversight, there would be no one to say "No" to plans like the Fruchthendler-Sabino pipeline.

3. Wasn't it Senator Bradley who introduced the idea of public school tax credits in the AZ legislature? Did his family utilize a private school K-8, and then University High School, the TUSD school with competitive admissions, extremely high test scores, and (after public school tax credits were passed by the legislature) the highest public school tax credit net in the district?

Do your internet research, David Safier, and phone some of your well-connected friends to fact-check. Research ALL the obstacles to and perversions of EQUITY (and who is responsible for them) and inform the public. That's your goal here in this blog, right?

So, bottom line: is the sadly misled, factually inaccurate commenter #1 above correct in stating that we should sign the SOS petition to save the public schools that "belong to us all"? One could say that TUSD schools like Utterback, a very "flawed at the moment" institution serving a low-SES population which recently lost its magnet status in part because of the poor quality of its programs and deficiently qualified staff, may "belong to" anyone who wants to enroll it: it will always have plenty of open seats. But schools like Fruchthendler, Sam Hughes, and University High do not belong to anyone who wants to enroll. The first two belong first to people who live in their designated neighborhoods, which have prohibitively high home values. After that, if there are spaces, they are open to those who apply to "open enroll." Through what mysterious process or algorithm TUSD's central office authorities determine how some who apply get in and some do not, we do not know. What we do know is that there are not enough spaces in the "good" schools in TUSD like Sam Hughes and Fruchthendler for all those who would like to attend. As for University High School, it is only available to students who have high GPAs and high scores on tests of cognitive aptitude. It serves a lot of relatively affluent, relatively well educated Tucsonans, including several well-connected Democratic "Supporters of Public Schools!" who sent their kids to more affluent public districts and / or to private schools K-8 and would only condescend to enroll a child in TUSD if the child passed the admissions test to University High School. You know: the sort of people who scream "EQUITY!" and "WELFARE FOR THE RICH!" when less affluent families want to take their their per-pupil funding out of some of the low functioning schools in TUSD and, through ESA legislation / SB1431, transfer it to the kinds of private schools many of these equity-concerned (?) folks used for their own children.

Perhaps Ms. Pedersen and Ms. Darland might want to give a pass on ESAs to those TUSD residents who have applied to "open enroll" in Hughes and Fruchthendler, but did not get in. Perhaps Senator Bradley might want to give a pass on ESAs to those who have applied for admission to University High School, but did not get in. Perhaps not. Do they actually care about TUSD residents who don't happen to be able to access the little enclaves of privilege some TUSD constituents have managed to carve out for themselves in the midst of a massive dysfunctional district where only the privileged and people with "pull" get their advocacy goals met, a district which, nevertheless, serves primarily people without "pull," the children of the poor? Their opposition to SB1431 would appear to suggest not.

6 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Opposing SB1431 is not supporting "EQUITY." on 06/22/2017 at 10:36 AM

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation