Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: Guest Commentary: Last 30 Days

Re: “Guest Opinion

https://thebaffler.com/latest/the-handmaid… This is a solid perspective on the extent of the bias in the book being used, and not biased by financial conflict of interest.

11 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Tom Rhodes on 11/04/2017 at 10:39 AM

Re: “Guest Opinion

If ethics is truly embedded in this class, I think it should be aimed at AZ legislators instead of HS students.

11 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Pima Mujer on 11/04/2017 at 5:39 AM

Re: “Guest Opinion

Dr. McKenna is correct in noting that not all folks associated with the Freedom Center are libertarians. The problem, however, is that 100% of those involved with the high school economics course are. And they are eager to push their political agenda onto young students. Thats right out of the Koch/Kendrick playbook. Dave Schmidtz and his wife Cathleen Johnson control this course as well as the 3 graduate courses to train teachers. Dr. Johnson is not a regular faculty member hired through an open search requiring support across the whole department. Rather she is staff hired by her husband. My issue is that Schmidtz alone controls this course and hes teaching it from a slanted perspective. While hes a good philosopher (his PhD is in philosophy not Economics), the UA has a large number of actual PhDs in Economics. Our history department teaches history, our math department teacher math. Why is the Philosophy Department and now the Department of Moral Science teaching intro economics to high school students? The answer is simple: if the Econ department did, they would ensure a balanced approach and people from multiple perspectives would be involved. By allowing one personSchmidtzto control the course, only his perspective is presented. As McKenna says the course and the textbook lean in a direction favorable to libertarians and others who are right-leaning. See https://thebaffler.com/latest/the-handmaiden-of-entrepreneurship for a review of the text used in the class. Im happy to have the libertarian perspective included in a survey course, but intro economics needs to focus on mainstream economic ideas from multiple perspectives. It should be neither right nor left wing. Lets leave the teaching of economics to the Economics Department.

16 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Dianne Horgan on 11/03/2017 at 4:12 PM

Re: “Guest Opinion

Steve, you started your political life with a lie and then you have hidden behind the shirttails of all the old tired Tucson Demorats raising taxes at every chance you could get. You've help build monorails that run empty to nowhere, an expensive downtown that no citizens other that the rich, out of town visitors, or ignorant UofA students want to go to. You've promised street repairs which never happen and demanded we give up our 2nd amendment rights, and you've even defied State Laws for you pet peeves. You only represent those that have twisted liberal views such as your and you have never in your life been a conservative. You are just another ignorant tax and spend twit. Let some with big boy pants step and turn the horrendous city government around.

1 like, 10 dislikes
Posted by VetnamVet2 on 11/02/2017 at 11:24 AM

Re: “Guest Opinion

...and the Templeton Foundation is a conduit through which the Koch brothers route money to schools so they will teach the children that the EPA is bad for the environment, and that sweatshops are good for 3rd graders.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_pol…

21 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Jeffrey Patten on 11/02/2017 at 10:36 AM

Re: “Guest Opinion

Conscience dictates that one would be more horrified by the continuation of promoting liberal progressive ideology that is failing in every aspect of society. Instead of screaming "Koch Bros, Koch Bros", try doing some thinking on your own. And learn to accept the fact that the poor will never run the country. No matter how much you cry about it.

5 likes, 21 dislikes
Posted by Wayne Olson on 11/02/2017 at 9:21 AM

Re: “Guest Opinion

I think both Safier and McKenna protest too much. I'm simultaneously heartened that the there is some level of debate and awareness in such matters at the UA and horrified at the Koch's continuing attempts to influence universities, which is well documented by this time. I think if Safier stuck with the latter argument, there would be a solid story to cover here. But the point of journalism now being to sell papers/adverts, I notice TW likes to rouse the rabble in both directions...I assume TW pays better than the Sentinel, so you can't blame them for writing hot articles and staying employed I guess...

11 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by desertrat on 11/02/2017 at 9:07 AM

Re: “Guest Opinion

After two or three writers using gallons of ink on this topic, I still have no idea of the content of the course.

8 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by bslap on 11/02/2017 at 7:26 AM

Re: “Guest Opinion

The writer pretty well rebuts his own claims by his inability to conceal his polemical disdain for counter-libertarian ideas.

And while it is possible that he is not aware of the close ties between the Kendricks and the Kochs, it is not a well kept secret that Randy Kendrick is a central player in the Koch Donor Network. She is also the person that bankrolled APS to disadvantage solar power against dirty technologies, a favorite issue for the Kochs.

A simple Google search of "Koch" and "university" reveals lots of reporting on this topic.

24 likes, 13 dislikes
Posted by Jimmy Zuma on 11/02/2017 at 4:43 AM

© 2017 Tucson Weekly | 7225 Mona Lisa Rd. Ste. 125, Tucson AZ 85741 | (520) 797-4384 | Powered by Foundation