Cecilia Acevedo has come a long way since working 12-plus-hour shifts at the maquiladoras in Ímuris, Sonora.

She moved there from her hometown of Cananea—a mining city less than an hour away from Naco, Arizona—at the age of 15 to get a factory job. While working there, she met her husband, and 15 years after that, the couple immigrated to Tucson. They wanted their children to have better opportunities than the ones they ever got.

Acevedo remembers going to work at a ranch as early as 3 or 4 a.m., and bringing her youngest daughter, Belinda, along—wrapped in thick blankets during the winter, carefully tucked in a wheelbarrow. The couple’s job was to feed horses and other farm animals. They were undocumented at the time.

“For a long time, we would just work, work, work,” Acevedo says. “We never even knew Tucson because we were always locked up at the ranch.”

After years of hustling, Acevedo’s and her ex-husband’s income was enough to rent a home big enough for the family of four. But then the divorce came and Acevedo’s husband took off. “He just quit,” Acevedo says. Her daughter was 10, and her son was 16. Her ex never paid child support.

Acevedo could no longer afford rent, so she and her two children moved into a tiny apartment in South Tucson. That’s how it went—from small apartment to small apartment, trying to leverage a low income while trying to feed her kids and keep a roof over their heads.

Even after her son—who became a legal resident through marriage when he was still a teen—claimed Acevedo and helped her get a green card, it’s been tough to get by with little English and no high school diploma.

About a year ago, though, Acevedo heard about a program sponsored by the Primavera Foundation, a nonprofit that focuses on helping the homeless community and people living in poverty.

The Her Family program focuses on economically empowering single mothers and their daughters—everything from teaching them how to best manage even the smallest of incomes to striving to become homeowners and providing a pathway out of poverty.

Two weeks before Christmas last year, Acevedo and her daughter moved into a brand new, three-bedroom, two-bathroom home in the City of South Tucson. She jokes that no one else wanted to move there because of the location. To her, it’s all she ever wished for.

“There is a really high success rate. Having people support each other with their goals … sometimes they might be in the program for several years, but many of them have become successful first-time homebuyers,” says Peggy Hutchison, CEO of the Primavera Foundation.

Thanks to $30,000 raised by Primavera and several other partner organizations, Acevedo’s mortgage woes went from $75,000 to roughly $44,000. She pays about $400 monthly—including utilities—which is a few hundred dollars less than what she paid when she rented.

Acevedo still works seven nights a week for a company that cleans banks afterhours. And, during the day, she does other housekeeping jobs. But at least now she can save up to go on vacation with her family—something that a few years back was unimaginable.

“I can’t sit down, I have to work. My daughter tells me, ‘Mom, don’t go to work today, stay with me.’ But I tell her … working … that’s how I have accomplished this,” she says as she sits on a couch she just bought for her home. Her daughter sits next to her, smiling and looking at photos from their recent trip to Kino Bay, Sonora.

Affordability and a Better Life

The Primavera Foundation runs a handful of services promoting affordable homeownership and rent for families and single mothers like Acevedo. It’s also been the push behind housing projects like Las Abuelitas—low-income rentals for grandparents who are raising their grandchildren. In the case of Las Abuelitas, the land where it stands was donated by Pima County, and the apartments will remain low-income for three decades.

There’s also transitional housing, which is primarily for people who are getting off the streets. But, for long, programs either via Pima County or organizations like Primavera and the South Tucson Housing Authority, have been there to benefit the working poor. Plenty in the City of South Tucson spend more than one-third of their income on rent and utilities—as was Acevedo’s case in the past—or simply get by couch surfing.

As South Tucson struggles at every level, establishing a foundation for dignified living conditions is key to see the city improve economically.

“From our perspective, there is no equity of opportunities in our community and across this nation,” Hutchison says. “Our role as an organization is to partner with them, providing that opportunity for people to build their assets. They are strong, they are smart, they work really hard, but not everybody has an equal play field. If you look at poverty … women, families of color, working poor. They tend to be in that cycle [because] they don’t have the same opportunities.”

Housing Authority purely focuses on low-income rents—getting people back on their feet so they can move onto a better future. Under that umbrella, there are 50 family units—from one to four bedrooms—and 50 apartments for senior citizens and people with disabilities.

Despite the headaches of trying to maintain a facility like the Housing Authority, Executive Director Marilyn Chico is proud to be at the forefront of a place that makes a dent in people’s hardships. Without the Housing Authority, which gets very limited funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, hundreds of people would either remain on the streets or living in decrepit apartments paycheck-to-paycheck.

“I look at the kids and say, ‘Well, thank God I know you at least have a decent place to live in,” she says. Chico has worked at the Housing Authority for 20 years. “Since I have been here, I am seeing second generation going into public housing. That part to me is heartbreaking. We are seeing the poorest of the poor.”

But there are also the success stories—the young single mothers who, because of an affordable rent, could drop the second job to finish school, or save up for a down payment on an affordable home. “We have had young women who have gotten really good jobs, bought their own homes,” Chico says. “We provide self-sufficiency to help people get into the job market and better themselves.”

Relying on one source of funding—HUD—makes for an interesting rollercoaster. Whatever happens, though, Chico knows that low-income housing will always exist. However, she does wish that the City of South Tucson could count on extra money to invest in programs that benefit its residents. It’s frustrating to her to have several minds who want to do so much for this little city but have their hands tied. There simply is no money.

“Everybody is always fighting for grants. Everybody is looking for money, looking for revenue to come in and help the programs so we can service the residents of South Tucson better,” Chico says. “That is the goal for everyone here.”

It’s no news that South Tucson struggles—the same old but very accurate tale of the cycle of poverty and disenfranchisement experienced by the 80 percent of Latinos and Hispanics who live in the pueblo within a city.

In 2013, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco looked into the demographics of several Pima County towns and cities, including South Tucson— a 1.2-square-mile city that’s home to at least 5,500 people.

The report found that 22 percent of the city’s residents are unemployed, and those who do have a job have a median income of $22,000 a year. If you’re a single mother, which 13 percent of South Tucson’s households are, the figure may be less.

More than half of South Tucsonans live below the poverty line, and 84 percent of homes—even with one working family member, is on food stamps or some sort of government help. It’s no coincidence that, simultaneously, fewer than 5 percent of South Tucson residents have a college degree, and roughly more than half have a high school diploma or GED—compared to areas like Catalina Foothills, where less than 10 percent of residents are Hispanic or Latino, the average income is $80,000 a year, and way more than half of residents have bachelor’s degrees or higher.

Pima County and South Tucson are trying to promote homeownership in the city, a place where more than 70 percent of people rent. But without affordable options, it’s unrealistic to expect a person making $20,000 annually will even consider jumping into that route.

The deep-rooted issues only seem to get worse when there’s a local government that is drowning in deficit. With a budget in fiscal year 2015-16 of about $10 million, debt piles up—from the $300,000 the city owed Waste Management, which left the thousands of residents without garbage service starting in August of last year (South Tucson recently reached an agreement with the City of Tucson for the latter to absorb trash services in its sister city), to the roughly $1 million the city owns in jail bills to Pima County.

“Housing is one of our biggest infrastructure problems. There aren’t many options for improving housing and for creating affordable housing,” says Mick Jensen, a planner with the City of South Tucson. Every now and then, the city gets HUD money through Pima County. But that funding has gone from about $400,000 to $60,000—and it’s all been geared toward emergency home repairs, he adds. “We used to have a limit of $25,000, so that’s two houses. We have done emergency home repairing with a limit of $8,000, but once again that’s seven or eight houses that you can do some repair to. There isn’t much money out there.”

To pile up to the laundry list of disadvantages, there’s a pattern in South Tucson of property owners who are MIA, merely collecting rent money for properties they don’t even maintain.

“The housing situation makes our crime problems more difficult, too” Jensen says. “What you really would hope is that landlords would be more aggressive in taking care of their properties. Absentee landlords, who are willing to rent to people without background information … that invites all sorts of bad behavior.”

In May 2015, South Tucson’s Planning and Zoning Department presented an economic development plan that proposed to redevelop 37 acres of empty land and unused property, and morph it into a business center to generate more jobs, as well as property and sales tax. It’s all with the hope to hike the city’s revenue and get out of debt.

Planning and Zoning Director Joel Gastelum says the city would offer incentives to business and property owners, such as an eight-year property tax abatement.

But before this plan rolls out, the city has to persuade the yet unidentified people behind the acres and acres of undeveloped buildings and land.

Betty Villegas, program manager at the Pima County Housing Center, calls them slumlords. They, too, have been a major block in efforts to develop affordable housing in South Tucson.

There’s the Pima County Community Land Trust, which relies on landlords’ willingness to sell at an affordable price, or donate altogether, their land or establishment so that it can be “rehabbed” and then sold to low-income buyers.

The whole purpose of a community land trust is to provide residents the opportunity of owning a home for cheap—but the land remains property of the county or city.

“The home stays affordable for the long term. It is a 99-year lease,” says Maggie Amado-Tellez, executive director of Pima County Community Land Trust, meaning a mom could pass down the house to her daughter, without concerns of whether or not it can be afforded in the future.

“Home ownership is probably the biggest investment that most people of color will make. People want to own a home because they want to give their families security and safety,” Villegas says.

Amado-Tellez says that, sadly, there hasn’t been much progress in the program. The city doesn’t have any money to invest in it, or properties to donate, and the county has to stretch the fund it gets from HUD among all of its incorporated and unincorporated areas.

As of now, Amado-Tellez, and other collaborators, are trying to build up a list of abandoned properties, “contact the owners and see if they are willing to sell to us or give them to us,” Amado-Tellez says.

Women who go through Primavera’s Her Family program also learn about the land trust model. As Acevedo puts it, it’s not about the location of the home, or owning the land, it’s about what’s inside and having the satisfaction of decorating a home that’s yours for the long run.

But, just like the county, hunting for property owners is a big challenge.

“The city has a hard time locating the owners, [but] we can work together,” Hutchinson says. “It is also about keeping neighborhoods safe. Having healthy and affordable places to live.”

Part of building strong neighborhoods and cities is having more homeowners and people who care about improving their surroundings, Jensen says.

Despite criticism and ongoing propaganda that South Tucson should become part of the City of Tucson, Gastelum and Jensen have no doubt that South Tucson will see better days. They have faith in the economic development plan, which they see as the key that will open the door to other types of growth, including improved housing.

“At times it discourages us, [but] I am not going to let it put us down,” Gastelum says. “We still have to move forward and a lot of things are happening. The biggest thing is making South Tucson a destination point. Once we do a lot of things we want to get done here, I hope they will see how important we are and what a big asset to the overall community we are.”

Like many areas in Tucson, Gastelum and Jensen fear progress in South Tucson will come with gentrification. So, it’s very important for city officials to foster growth but take care of what’s kept the city’s soul afloat—its history and culture.

“South Tucson is one of the last neighborhoods that hasn’t been invaded …taken over by outsiders coming in, buying property and improving it to the extent that it is not affordable to most people here, so [residents] lose their housing options,” Jensen says. “There are good and bad news to gentrification. It obviously improves property, brings up the general demographic of the neighborhood, high-income people. What we would like to do is protect the folks who live here.”

“The cultural strength here is our biggest asset. I think that people don’t often look at the good that is South Tucson…yes, we have money problems right now, but every municipality has money problems,” Jensen adds. “Nobody in South Tucson thinks we should fold up and go away. The people in South Tucson are very protective of the city as an entity. We certainly can’t feel any different than that.”

I was born and raised in Guatemala City, Guatemala. I moved to Tucson about 10 years ago. Since I was old enough to enjoy reading, I developed an interest in writing, and telling stories through different...

16 replies on “South Tucson: The Pueblo Within the Problems”

  1. Send us your poor, your tired…..ok wait a minute here. This is a lesson on how to denigrate a nation of compassionate people. And the flow of illegals will continue.Immigration reform should not be about amnesty. It ought to be about HONEST enforcement and a process that we control.

  2. South Tucson is a small impoverished community that has been taken over by social agencies. We are a magnet for persons with drug and mental problems, due to the proliferation of these profitable nonprofits. (there’s money in poverty). We have six locations in our very small, one square mile community, helping persons with drug addictions and mental problems. As of now we are fighting Pasadera, a behavioral health agency which wants to locate a 70-person residential drug and mental rehab across the street from Mission View Elementary school. Our community sees this action as a form of child abuse.

    The principal of Mission View school was involved with Pasadera, running their meetings and apparently believed that a drug rehab across the street from an elementary school is a good idea. TUSD was informed about this and failed to take a stand against Pasadera. The Mayor of the City was recalled due to his coziness with Pasadera in trying to get this mega drug rehab into our town. Mick Jensen was at a Pasadera meetings and was upset because members of our community disrupted the meeting and asked questions as to why this, one more, drug rehab was coming to our community. Jensen could and should have prevented the Pasadera situation since by being a City Planner he should have known that the location Pasadera had selected for a drug rehab was not zoned for that purpose.

    Now Jensen and South Tucson’s Zoning Director Joel Gastelum are saying they fear gentrification? What is wrong with these guys. Our town has been allowed to go into extreme reverse gentrification for decades. Our town’s culture is not being perpetuated. This town is nothing like I remember in the 50s and 60s when mostly hard working families who had been here for generations populated the city and we were proud of our little corner.

    As for the problems we are having with Waste Management and with the illegal secondary tax for which the city is being sued, but was not mentioned in the article, both were due to the poor advice of a previous City Attorney who has now been rewarded with a County judgeship. In our politics it’s not what you know that counts.

    When families are moving to a community, most look into the quality of the schools. In South Tucson that would be” Strike one”, not even the school principal is interested in the safety and wellbeing of the children. The next thing they would look at is safety and quality of life, “Strike two” it’s a dark and dangerous place on 10th Avenue one of the main thoroughfares there are 20 “dead” street lights in a 14 block area. A family thinking of moving to South Tucson would also have to look at the capacity of the government to run the city and that would be the end of that inning, “strike three” if in doubt review the article.

    We need ethical, reasonably capable persons running our city, a better school, the one we have has proven to be a dropout factory (TUSD where are you?). and most of all we need more community involvement.

    Raul Green
    Comunidad Primero

  3. The report found that 22 percent of the city’s residents are unemployed, and those who do have a job have a median income of $22,000 a year. If you’re a single mother, which 13 percent of South Tucson’s households are, the figure may be less.

    Welfare mothers make better lovers — Neil Young

  4. The constantly seeking of Federal grants and public donations by its many promoters are not an all in one solution in helping to alleviate poverty, drugs, housing, prostitution, homeless, mental ill people walking the streets, transients, panhandlers, better City government , and for consequently having good results in people becoming independent, productive and conclusively more educated.

    It’s historical been factual that the City of South Tucson for over 40 years has continuously been inundated by its City government grossed mismanagement of money, including illegal taxes, resources and its people. It’s all time success has only been a grant, loan or a promise away. Billions of dollars that have throughout time been received by all these goody good shoes have not made a dent into these City’s problems, it’s just gotten worse.

    But what goes behind the curtains…….. Do we know, will they really tell us? In the mean time with all these so call social charitable good intentional community savers, while in reality life in the City of South Tucson has been made worse, especially for its resident’s quality of life, the tax payer’s cancer diagnosis is currently critically running its deathly course?

    Stay tuned for Pasadera behavioral Health Net Work VRS City of South Tucson, Superior Court Case set for hearing on March/07/2016. At 1:30 PM, will be argued for 90 minutes, the stakes are ultimately high for either party, tax payer’s attendance is highly recommended. The weak at heart please stay home.

    Besides of all the good they do, what we the public need to know is the numbers. A good neutra audit of their books, employees, their pay roll account and their handling of their in-house business in general, it can tell us lots of tales, BS will not suffice. The percentage of what really goes to the real needy people they are helping is in question, in all fair news interviews, we all need to know.

    Raymond Beltran
    City of South Tucson Business owner

  5. The constantly seeking of Federal grants and public donations by its many promoters are not an all in one solution in helping to alleviate poverty, drugs, housing, prostitution, homeless, mental ill people walking the streets, transients, panhandlers, better City government , and for consequently having good results in people becoming independent, productive and conclusively more educated.

    It’s historical been factual that the City of South Tucson for over 40 years has continuously been inundated by its City government grossed mismanagement of money, resources and its people. It’s all time success has only been a grant, loan or a promise away. Billions of dollars that have throughout time been received by all these goody good shoes have not made a dent into these City’s problems, it’s just gotten worse.

    But what goes behind the curtains…….. Do we know, will they really tell us? In the mean time with all these so call social charitable good intentional community savers, while in reality life in the City of South Tucson has been made worse, especially for its resident’s quality of life, the tax payer’s cancer diagnosis is currently critically running its deathly course?

    Stay tuned for Pasadera behavioral Health Net Work VRS City of South Tucson, Superior Court Case set for hearing on March/07/2016. At 1:30 PM, will be argued for 90 minutes, the stakes are ultimately high for either party, tax payer’s attendance is highly recommended. The weak of heart please stay home.

    Besides of all the good they do, what we the public need to know is the numbers. A good audit of their books, employees, their pay roll account and their handling of their in-house business in general, it can tell us lots of tales, BS will not suffice. The percentage of what really goes to the real needy people they are helping is in question, for a fair domocratically both sides news interview, we all need to know.

    Raymond Beltran
    City of South Tucson Business owner

  6. Interesting that the Weekly is deleting comments that did not in any way violate their terms.

    Is the fact that Michelle Obama was spending $6000.00 per night of taxpayer dollars for a vacation in Spain while South Tucson is impoverished deserving of censorship?

    Is the fact that this entire story is based on illegal aliens and a deadbeat dad throwing themselves on the taxpayers of Americans irrelevant and worth of censorship?

    Is the fact that people in the article are grateful that they are not being “invaded” by whitey worthy of criticism, yet sure to be censored?

    Welcome to the Tucson Weekly and a liberal utopia where only accepted thought is accepted and not censored.

    All lives matter, even…white ones.

  7. Maybe the Weekly should consider a name change – a name that truly represents their purpose.

    The Tucson Safe Room

    Where liberal thought is protected and never an offensive thought is allowed.

  8. In spite of some negative comments, this is a well written and very important article that deals with important issues (poverty, gentrification, neighborhood development and resident rights) that can affect our whole community, of which the City of South Tucson plays a unique and important part.
    It is true that the town has been used and abused in the past, but with the popular overthrow of the corrupt Eckstom machine by the voters of COST the people finally have a chance to improve the community for the benefit of the residents. Like everywhere, there needs to be a balance: over saturation of rehab centers and other agencies that could be detrimental to the neighborhood should be restricted based on need, while agencies like Primavera — which can help stabilize families — need to be supported. Casa Maria not only feeds the homeless, but hungry families in South Tucson as well. Small business — like the new St. Charles Bar or the Gloo Factory print shop — are starting to be drawn to the area which can help the tax base as well as local employment.
    South Tucson is a very special and unique entity which should be supported and cherished. Viva COST!

  9. Corrupt Eckstrom Is history now?
    But there are still roots hanging on,Evil versus Good, will always be with us,

    We have to always beware of existing Eckstroms and new Eckstroms to come
    ….the mystery of all time,
    MAY GOD HELP US…

  10. Pima County Community Trust, affordable
    Homes for the poor in COST? what a break,
    PURCHASING A HOME AT a 99 YEAR LEASE,
    Sounds like modern slavery to me,
    Very fishy in deed.

    I believe the parks,Would be a better option for the people. Some how somebody
    stands to gain out there.

  11. To prevent gentrification in Cost,
    subsequently in trying to prevent replacing the poor……….. for
    Well to do rich people, the Feds…
    Should continue to funnel millions
    Of dollars constantly in the hands of
    all these nonprofit Corporations,in COST.

    Mind you, COST is only one square
    Mile. Honestly, who would have thought
    So, with such an easy formula?

    There shall never be, no gentrification
    In COST…..Send us your tire, and your pooor…………..

  12. The City of South Tucson believes it’s driving towards progress, but they have not noticed their vehicle is going in reverse. They say they fear gentrification, but they are on the side of low-income housing and more drug rehabs. City Planner Mick Jensen has been in Favor of Pasadera drug rehab locating across the street from our school since May 2014, even though they are not entitled to be at that location. As a City Planner, he should have known that from the beginning,

    I believed Jensen worked for Pasadera, I recently found out he is a City of South Tucson Employee. In this case, he is largely responsible for the lawsuit we are currently facing. We are tired of City employees costing the city millions of dollars without there being consequences. This has to change.

Comments are closed.