The morning after a good desert rain, when the low winter sun pierces the remnant clouds and warms the saturated soil, you can see the steamy breath of the Earth exhale into the humid air.
In my backyard, barren just a few weeks ago, a fresh veneer of tiny seedlings glistens with dew each morning. Seemingly convinced that this winter’s rains are for real, innumerable seeds have rolled the biological dice and committed to expending the energy sequestered within them. The bet is that the abundant moisture will persist long enough that they might rise up, bloom and, despite a very late start, put down seed for future generations before the return of withering heat.
Hopefully, that bet will pay off, and you certainly can’t blame the seeds for taking it. Lifelong weather nerds like me probably pay more attention to this stuff than anyone whose title doesn’t end in “-ologist,” but the meteorological events of this past month have been hard for anyone to ignore. Officially, Tucson was drenched with nearly three inches of rain in just a few weeks, leaving us at double the average rainfall for this point in the year. The storm system that raged through Arizona around Jan. 21 was one of the most intense ever to hit the state, producing hurricane-force winds, the first tornado watch in memory and some of the lowest barometric pressure readings ever recorded here. A Salt River Project official said that the storm threw down more moisture on the Salt and Verde River watersheds than any other on record, and even the dusty Santa Cruz and Rillito flowed for days. It is safe to say that this year’s El Niño has not been a bust.
Duly noted, but you don’t have to look back very far or search very wide to determine that the recent bluster is really just a splash in a very dry bucket. Counting back to the first of October (the beginning of the water year as measured by people who get paid to measure such things), we’re still at only 75 percent of normal precipitation in Tucson. Last year was the fourth-driest ever recorded here, with less than half of normal rainfall. Moreover, our single soggy month comes on the heels of our driest and warmest decade ever, one that ended with a cumulative rainfall deficit of more than 30 inches.
If the amateur math doesn’t give you pause, consider the professional version. Scientists who measure the weather tell us that, with increasing frequency, things are happening that have never happened in 125 years. Scientists who measure tree rings tell us that our climate is experiencing shifts on the order of centuries and millennia. Scientists who measure ice cores at the poles of our planet tell us that we are distorting the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere in ways that have not occurred in hundreds of thousands of years. There is no doubt: Our climate is undergoing an epochal change.
Alas, science no longer has much traction with a cynical American public. It’s easier to believe the naysayers who want to pretend that a month of rain, or a couple of blizzards, or even a record-breaking Washington, D.C., winter somehow disproves the fundamental paradigm shift at work. What the willfully benighted blowhards on Fox News and the petroleum pimps in the U.S. Congress are not talking about is the warmest January ever in Vancouver, British Columbia, and the serious challenge it has presented to the viability of this winter’s Olympics. Nor do they acknowledge that for many years now, climate scientists have predicted increased storm intensity as a function of climate change, or that record-breaking snowfalls actually help prove the point. The naysayers prefer to ignore a vast body of evidence and a nearly universal scientific consensus and instead sensationalize isolated errors in data and minor disagreements among scientists regarding the precise details of the projected catastrophe.
But you needn’t listen to my propaganda any more than theirs. Look it up for yourself—or just look around. Look at the vast stands of dead conifers at the tops of our mountains, massacred by beetles that no longer die off in mild winters and fried by infernos intensified by heat and drought. Look at our rivers and streams disappearing underground. Look at the trucked-in slush that is passing for snow at the Olympics.
And then look with me at the wisps of vapor escaping the sodden soil the day after a rain, and tell me why it’s anything other than an ephemeral anomaly, a beautiful but tragic metaphor for an unfolding ecological disaster that threatens to wring the life out of our fair Earth.
This article appears in Feb 18-24, 2010.

“Scientists who measure the weather tell us that, with increasing frequency, things are happening that have never happened in 125 years. Scientists who measure tree rings tell us that our climate is experiencing shifts on the order of centuries and millennia”
Don’t you know hyperbole when you hear it? Why is it that every short term weather event is a sign of the apocalypse? Get a grip!
“There is no doubt: Our climate is undergoing an epochal change.” Now that’s quite an open-minded scientific approach to a complex problem.
“The naysayers … sensationalize isolated errors in data and minor disagreements …” So every body of data that disagrees with your thesis is isolated and minor.
This sort of uninformed editorializing is exactly why the public has become cynical. Science involves analysis of disparate data, not launching ad hominem attacks against anyone who disagrees with you.
The warm winter in Vancouver and the record cold and snowfall in Washington D.C. are both conclusive proof of epochal climate change. That seems to exhaust every possibility for showing any counter-example of global warming.
I think you should go back to pondering the seedlings in your back yard and leave editorial writing to someone who has the energy to do some balanced analysis and research.
You may be making the same error as those on the other side do to support their claim, that is, mistaking weather for climate. I have no doubt that human activity is changing the climate, but a month of severe weather that may be signaling an end to an extended, though not unusual drought, does not provide any proof to my position.
“…unfolding ecological disaster that threatens to wring the life out of our fair Earth” is on its way! (It has never been ‘our’ earth). The changes that are necessary to avert that will not happen until the disaster is in our living rooms. But do not worry about the planet, the earthquake in Haiti was Gaia scratching an itch. She will shrug her shoulders and cast off the parasite that is our species before it is too late. Enjoy the spring!
I will agree that we do have some changes going on. Question is, who is responsible and how much of that responsibility should the american taxpayer be burdened with? Al Gore would like everyone to believe that a true american should and will foot the bill for reform, it’s our duty. What AL forgets to tell us, is that the american taxpayer already pays for research of the H.A.A.R.P. Program. A program that puts in to question our leaderships real concern with global warming and/or climate change, not to mention other atmosphere/global concerns. Maybe thats why China and Russia are laughing at Al Gore, since they too are involved in Star Wars research. Now I do realize that the american taxpayer no longer is intitled to, have to foot the bill for such research, but then again no one is calling it “Star Wars.” Climate change is an important issue, but so is the deception of externalities that appear humane.
Randy:
I’m with you on cleaning up the environment and so forth, but the science behind the global warming hysteria is being exposed as fraudulent. You just wouldn’t know that from reading or watching most American media outlets. One of the best known researchers on GW has admitted to the London Daily Mail that there has been no global warming since 1995. This news and more damning news of academic fraud keeps coming out — just not in the US press. Broaden your horizons and read all about it.
Phil Jones admits that there has been no warming since 1995, it was warmer in the middle ages and the world didn’t end, and gee, I guess I lost all that original data. The IPCC admitted that their methodology was flawed, and has abandoned any claim that oceans levels will rise at all in the next one hundred years. It’s over Randy. It’s time to move from the denial phase, to the anger phase, through the depression, to ultimate acceptance. It will be O.K.
The weather is in cycles. As an engineer design is normally for 25, 50 100 or even 1,000 year events.
Guess what? Events show that the climate has been changing all the time!!! Poor man have little effect.