When Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu said during his press conference on Saturday, Feb. 18, that a lot of politicians and members of the media had already known that he was gay, he’s correct: I’ve had several discussions in recent months with politically in-the-know people who mentioned Babeu’s sexuality. So, yeah, it was out there.

The aspect of his outing that I find most stunning (aside from the accusations that led to his outing, which are in a whole other realm of “stunning”) is that Babeu apparently thought he would be able to skate through his congressional campaign without this coming out (literally) at some point.

There was no way.

Before the bombshell that led to Babeu’s coming-out, we had discussions here at the Tucson Weekly about covering Babeu’s sexuality. Ultimately, we decided against it, for all sorts of reasons, but the primary reason was this: Every gay, lesbian or bisexual individual should be able to decide for themselves when to make the intensely personal decision to come out. There are exceptions to this rule, in my book—hypocrisy, for example (I would not hesitate to out a gay, lesbian or bisexual individual if they were going around promoting anti-LGBT legislation)—but Babeu never did anything that we knew about to trigger any of those exceptions.

Now that he’s out, I hope Babeu does the right thing and stands up for his LGBT brothers and sisters when his fellow so-called conservatives say hateful things and push bigoted legislation. Of course, he should have been standing up for his LGBT brothers and sisters all along—but when it comes to doing the right thing, it’s better late than never.

5 replies on “Editor’s Note”

  1. Eloquently written Mr. Boegle. In a day and age when spewing vitriol has become the norm, it’s so wonderful to see someone take the “high road”. Thank you for maintaining the integrity of the Tucson Weekly and journalism in general.

  2. I’d be curious to hear more about his track record as a sherriff, and his qualifications to run for a legislative office. All I can find is a lot of very strong anti-immigrant material, nothing else.

  3. Hmmmm considering that nobody other than you “in the know” people actually knew this you should have reported it. If you are going to run for public office, yes you are expected to be honest about who you are. You also should be held to public standards (porn site pics anyone?) and those public standards are decided by, yes, the public, not journalists.

    You had no problem gossiping about other legislators private lives though did you?

  4. To use the phrase “his fellow so-called conservatives” is disingenious and deceitful. You should’ve just said all Republicans are evil and vicious bigots. Take the all-inclusive stance by over-generalizing about an entire political belief system next time. It shows more integrity with your editorials. Take pride in your fluff.

  5. sorry AZ_2_IP but most REpublicans are not evil or vicious bigots at all. Do they exist yes they do but they exist in both parties

Comments are closed.