Credit: Mari Herreras

You can’t say neighbors of Saguaro Ranch weren’t warned.

On the night of May 21, when the Marana Town Council voted to
abandon an easement that has caused much consternation for two years,
town attorney Frank Cassidy declared that “anyone walking or driving as
a member of the public on the portions of the easement located within
the town limits of the town of Marana will be treated as a trespasser,
and will be subject to arrest and prosecution at the discretion of the
investigating officer.”

Sure enough, several days later, Sharyl Cummings and Steven
Blomquist—neighbors of the 1,035-acre Marana
development—were warned by Marana Police when seen walking along
the easement. The next day, on May 27, they were out walking again,
this time carrying protest signs near the development’s
reservations-only restaurant, McClintock’s. The police issued each a
citation for criminal trespassing.

Cummings said she and Blomquist, her husband, did walk along the
easement to protest Saguaro Ranch owner Stephen Phinny’s development
and the town’s decision. Neighbors have argued all along that Phinny
knew about the public easement on his property, but ignored it in order
to develop the land according to his marketing plan—which touted
the gated community as so private that it has one entrance, an 700-foot
tunnel blasted out of a mountain off Thornydale Road.

“We believe they do not have the authority to (abandon the
easement),” Cummings said.

Cummings, her husband and two other neighbors are prepared to argue
that point and continue their fight over the public easement that many
in the area have used going back to the 1960s to access the Tortolita
Mountains.

The couple is expected to appear in Marana town court at 9 a.m.,
Tuesday, June 16, to address the trespass citations.

Meanwhile, their attorney, Stephen Weeks, who also represents two
other Saguaro Ranch neighbors—Tracy Chamberlain and Tim
Blowers—said he filed a lawsuit in Pima County Superior Court
against Marana on Friday, June 5, to keep the easement public and to
prohibit the town from handing out trespassing citations there.

Neighbors contend Phinny ignored what was a recorded public easement
by building his home, as well as McClintock’s, on top of the easement.
The dispute between Phinny and his neighbors began in earnest, however,
when Phinny blocked two entrances to the easement with boulders. The
neighbors, undeterred, used the easement and removed the boulders every
chance they could, despite warnings from Phinny’s attorney—even
though Phinny never filed for the easement to be formally
abandoned.

Phinny complained to Marana officials, but he was told that Marana
police could not cite anyone for trespassing until the easements were
formally abandoned. Meanwhile, when neighbors complained about the
boulders, Marana officials told them they couldn’t intervene unless a
court issued a judgment.

In May 2008, Cassidy told the Weekly that he hoped the
dispute would end once either the neighbors or Phinny got a court
judgment. In June, those neighbors took Cassidy’s advice and filed a
lawsuit against Phinny, asking the courts to determine if the easement
remains public.

Meanwhile, Phinny and Saguaro Ranch were beginning to feel the
economic woes, as Phinny faced dozens of lawsuits for outstanding bills
totaling more than $1 million.

The Weekly reported in October 2008 that a $50 million loan
Phinny received in 2006 from Kennedy Funding for development
construction matured in December 2008, and he was working on
refinancing and securing a new line of credit.

That never happened. By January 2009, Phinny had started bankruptcy
proceedings, and as a result, the lawsuit filed by the neighbors is on
hold by the court until the bankruptcy is complete. Weeks said he is in
the process of asking the court to lift a stay on the case and expects
the proceedings to continue in the next month.

The Weekly called Phinny attorney Craig Keller for comment,
but he did not respond as of our deadline.

The methods the town used to get the abandonment passed are
perplexing to Cummings. The abandonment was placed on the agenda as an
emergency item 24 hours before the meeting, and it was put on the
consent agenda, enabling the council to vote on dozens of items at once
without public discussion, she said.

“The first time they brought this before the council, they said they
were going to do a three-part study. But they never released the
results of the study,” she said.

Cummings said she was also troubled by remarks from Town
Councilmember Roxanne Ziegler at a Feb. 10 meeting. Ziegler reportedly
said that most of the people who wrote or spoke in support of the
public easement at a Feb. 3 meeting live beyond Marana’s city limits,
whereas Saguaro Ranch is within Marana’s city limits—and
therefore a true constituent.

“That’s not entirely true, but when I attended that meeting, I told
them that while not all of the people speaking out against the
abandonment are residents of Marana and may not be voting constituents,
their kids go to school in Marana; they use the banks in Marana; and
they shop in the stores in Marana,” Cummings said.

The Weekly e-mailed and called Ziegler for comment, but she
was out of town at press time.

Town Manager Gilbert Davidson said the three-part study was
completed and presented to the council prior to May 21. Staff members
looked at legal issues, Saguaro Ranch history and access to Tortolita
Mountain Park to provide a final recommendation that the easement be
abandoned.

“In this case, the council does not agree with what (Cummings and
her neighbors) are advocating for. (Council members) are looking at a
much broader perspective,” Davidson said.

Pima County, which owns Tortolita Mountain Park, doesn’t want
vehicular access and chose to develop foot access on the east side of
the park, according to Davidson. The neighbors respond that such a move
limits the park’s accessibility for the disabled and the elderly.

The area where Saguaro Ranch is located is in the heart of a resort
area designated in the town’s planning documents, Davidson confirms.
There is the Ritz-Carlton Dove Mountain, Saguaro Ranch and a third
resort community still in the planning stages called Tapestry.

“Look, in this case, the council does not agree,” Davidson
responded. “… That doesn’t change just because a few neighbors have a
different opinion.”

2 replies on “Access Wanted”

  1. I am Sharyl Cummings and would like to clarify a statement within this article. I have absolutely no objection to the existence of the residential community, Saguaro Ranch. I do, however, believe the law should apply to everyone. I, and others, have protested the blockage of the recorded public easement that runs through (in and out) of Saguaro Ranch and has been in use by the community at large for decades. I believe Saguaro Ranch/Stephen Phinny is the responsible party for the blockage and apparently has had the support of Marana since blocking a public easement is prohibited by law.
    Indeed I am protesting the actions of both entities.

  2. Thanks Sharyl. I assume you and your neighbors will be attending this and could use some company if anyone out there is interested:
    A peaceful protest will be held today to demonstrate the public’s opposition to Marana’s recent vote to abandon the public’s Tortolita access in favor of the Saguaro Ranch developer/development. This peaceful demonstration will be conducted near the corner of Moore Road and Thornydale Road intersection, in front of the Saguaro Ranch Sales Office. Efforts will get underway at 4 o’clock and will continue until dusk. Please tell your friends and neighbors, and plan on joining us! If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. You can also visit the website to share your thoughts and/or obtain the latest information and updates: http://tortolitamountainpublicaccess.com/

Comments are closed.