Follow the money, or as much as you can find, anyway. Always good advice.
The University of Arizona recently responded to a records request from Kochs Off Campus to list all funders of the Freedom Center since 2008 and the amount each contributed. It doesn’t appear to be a complete list, but it paints a picture of the political and economic leanings of the people whose money makes the Center’s existence possible.
The UA response to the Kochs Off Campus request lists 14 donors whose contributions total $8,325,000. That number is far short of what Michael McKenna, then the director of the Freedom Center, wrote in a November 2, 2017, response to my column about the high school course created by the Center. McKenna wrote,
According to [David Schmitz, founding director of the Freedom Center], since 2004 the Center for the Philosophy of Freedom has received $16 million dollars from roughly two dozen donors.
The reason for the discrepancy could be the dates. Kochs Off Campus asked for a list of donations beginning in 2008 while McKenna begins in 2004. David Schmidtz is in the best position to reconcile the two figures. In an article in UA’s paper, The Wildcat, the reporter said Schmidtz promised to share a donor list with the paper, but at the time of publication, she had not received one. Maybe Schmidtz is ready to share a complete list now.
Here’s the list of Freedom Center donors supplied by the UA.
Templeton Foundation: $2,900,000
Randy and Ken Kendrick: $1,500,000
Charles G. Koch Foundation: $1,345,500
Thomas W. Smith Foundation: $1,326,000
Donors Trust: $380,000
Jerry Fullinwider: $380,000
Karl and Stevie Eller: $350,000
APGAR Foundation: $67,000
Garland and Carolyn Cox: $31,000
Michael Kasser: $25,000
Nancy and Jack Weiss: $10,000
Gerry Ohrstrom: $5,000
Jim Click, Jr.: $5,000
Irv Mindes: $500
I looked into some of the major funders to find their political and economic leanings. Not surprisingly, they tilt to the political right. Many of them tend toward libertarianism, and their contributions, along with their ideology, follow closely on the heels of the Koch brothers. Here’s what I found.
Charles G. Koch Foundation: $1,345,500
Charles, half of the Charles-and-David Koch brothers team, is well enough known not to need any introduction. People in the Freedom Center point to his reasonably small contribution to the Center as an indication that he doesn’t wield much power and influence, but other donors’ ties to the Koch brothers indicate otherwise.
Randy and Ken Kendrick: $1,500,000
Ken is a co-owner of the Arizona Diamondbacks. His wife Randy is a lawyer and a one-time Goldwater Institute board member. The two of them are million-dollar-plus contributors to the Koch Donor Network. Randy was the prime mover behind the anti-Obamacare campaign mounted in conjunction with the Kochs. She helped create the Center to Protect Patient Rights, which consisted of a mailbox in a Phoenix-area post office. By 2010, the CPPR amassed a $62 million war chest.
Templeton Foundation: $2,900,000
The Templeton Foundation’s $2.9 million grant funded the creation of the high school course, “Ethics, Economy, and Entrepreneurship,” created by the Freedom Center and currently offered in four local school districts as well as a number of private and charter schools. The statements on the Foundation’s website concerning entrepreneurship and “economic freedom” mirror those espoused in the high school course.
Thomas W. Smith Foundation: $1,326,000
The Thomas W. Smith Foundation is “dedicated to supporting free markets, [and] has started paying for scholarly centers on campuses,” according to a member of its board of trustees. One of its contributions was $600,000 to Wake Forest University’s School of Business in North Carolina. According to the University, the money will be used for “the exploration of the proper relation among business, government, and society.” According to the executive director of the BB&T Center for the Study of Capitalism, “This gift will sponsor courses to explore what the moral purpose of business in a just and human society means to us and future generations.”
Donors Trust: $380,000
According to its website, the Donors Trust makes grants to groups which “promote the foundations of civil society: limited government, personal responsibility, and free enterprise.” Since it was founded in 1999, it has granted “over $900 million to over 1,600 charities.” The Trust keeps its donors’ identities confidential, which is why a Mother Jones article refers to it as The Dark-Money ATM of the Conservative Movement. The Koch brothers contribute to the trust, which turns around and grants money to Koch brothers-connected organizations like Americans for Prosperity, the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation.
Jerry Fullinwider: $380,000
Fullinwider is a major contributor to the Koch Brothers Network. He also supports SMU’s O’Neil Center for Global Markets and Freedom in Dallas, Texas, a free market think tank.
APGAR Foundation
The APGAR Foundation donated $165,000 to Strata Policy, which promotes fossil fuels at the same time it advances an anti-renewable energy agenda. The Charles Koch Foundation also gave to Strata Policy—more than $2 million. APGAR contributes to Florida Gulf Coast University which specializes in the ideas of free-market capitalism, where “every student who majors in economics and finance gets a copy of Ayn Rand’s novel, Atlas Shrugged.” The Charles Koch Foundation also contributes to FGCU.
This article appears in Apr 5-11, 2018.
Mr. Safier: What are the aims of your reporting here beyond trying to smear Prof. Schmidtz and his efforts to provide students at UA with opportunities that they wouldn’t have had otherwise? Because of Schmidtz’s efforts, UA’s philosophy graduate program is widely recognized as one of the best in the country in political philosophy. Instead of trying to cause him grief, why not praise his entrepreneurial efforts that have brought better opportunities to students in Arizona? Lots of centers, departments, and individual faculty members at UA have sought external funding to support their programs. That you have focused on Prof. Schmidtz seems rather telling to your motives.
His aim is to indoctrinate the angry left because they continue to fail at controlling little more than young untested minds. Trashing Karl Eller proves that theory.
Wow, are you really that stupid?
AllisonM, thank you for your comments. In answer, I recommend you read “Dark Money” by Jane Mayer. My concerns aren’t with David Schmidtz as such, who by all accounts is a strong academic and, in my one phone conversation with him, a decent guy. I’m concerned about the pernicious, calculated efforts by the Koch brothers and others of their ilk to further an agenda which I believe is dangerous to the economic and political future of the country.
If the Freedom Center existed in isolation, I would shrug and move on. No big deal. But it’s another of hundreds of incursions into academia purchased by extremely wealthy ideologues, as well as another way the Koch brothers are inserting themselves into Arizona’s political and economic life, to the state’s detriment.
Useful context: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/books/r…
I was at the recent UA lecture about the Freedom School. I wish you had discussed the frightening terms of the donor agreements which UA signed. Some strings attached to these funds include donor approval of faculty and donor approval of dissertation topics. Some approved topics include “The Ethics of Price Gouging” and “Positive Outcomes of Eugenics.”
Interesting how liberals who used to defend freedom of ideas are now those that want to stop any ideas that don’t align with their agenda. This is exactly what totalitarian communist regimes like the USSR, North Korea, China and Cuba did when they imprisoned their intellectuals and killed those that would debate.
How is donor approval of ideas freedom in any sense of the word? How about taxpayer freedom, as the “freedom school” will be funded by taxpayers for 25 years after donor money is gone? How is funding a press (Sagent Press) run by the professor’s wife as their personal address is on the LLC a “free press” when none of its contents is juried or scientific in any way? Freedom to deny science is actually fascism, Mr. Martin.
Wow, people with money are the largest contributors? Egads, stop the presses. I expected all the money to be supplied by people who don’t have any money.
And heaven knows we need to reduce economic freedom and entrepreneurship.
Sabasabas. One of the presenters talked about the hiring restrictions, but I haven’t heard about dissertaion topic suggeations. If you have some information, please add it to the comments or email me at the address above.
I am not sure why the reference to “The Ethics Of Price Gouging” by Matt Zwolinski was made but not shared. I encourage you to look it up and see if you do not agree 100% with it.
Positive outcome of eugenics?…” the government should not have such power as to decide who should reproduce and who should not. that would border upon Nazi like tyranny”
Is that in some way unreasonable or offensive?
David Safier writes, “Follow the money, or as much as you can find, anyway. Always good advice.”
I believe questions have been raised in these comment streams and elsewhere about who funded the expensive, NY based, multi-attorney legal team arguing that the legislation used to ban MAS should be declared unconstitutional. And there was a protracted outcry over the long delay in production of campaign finance records for Adelita Grijalva’s 2014 TUSD Board campaign.
I don’t recall reading any compelling cries for transparency in this venue in those cases.
Tim Steller has just published a piece advocating that we bring on millions of dark liberal money to combat the dark conservative money. At least he’s honest that “turn about is fair play” is about the most exalted principle his side can come up with these days. To the extent that they are incapable of effective advocacy for the right principles being applied uniformly to all comers, their inconsistency destroys their own credibility as advocates for transparency.
Some who call themselves “liberals” still understand that mind control and elimination of ideological opposition through any means possible are not the right goals to be striving for in a free society, but they are increasingly an endangered species.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/education/edlife/middlebury-divided-campus-charles-murray-free-speech.html
Any Professor that would “punish” a student by lowering their grade based on political opinions should be removed from teaching as they are a fraud.
Tim Steller is a mindless captive of the mainstream media mantra that a journalist should essentially never really take a side (even if he is writing an opinion piece), which is why his “opinions” are really just a tedious mush of corrosive false equivalencies, embarrassing political distortions and “he said/she said” dissembling.