Blog Categories: Politics | News | Do This! | Music | Chow | Media | Fun in General | Education | Community Info | Cinema | Arts and Culture | Sports | more categories»
Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Tucson City Council Votes To Appeal Ruling That Election System Is Unconstitutional
Posted By Jim Nintzel on Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:27 AM
The Tucson City Council voted 5-0 yesterday to appeal the recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that the city's election system is unconstitutional. Council members Shirley Scott and Paul Cunningham recused themselves from voting on the decision because they are the targets of a lawsuit filed in Pima County Superior Court to strip them of their seats because, even though they won the citywide election, they lost within their wards.
Meanwhile, Arizona Republic conservative columnist Rob Robb says the Ninth Circuit got it wrong and chides Republicans for celebrating the victory:
Meanwhile, Arizona Republic conservative columnist Rob Robb says the Ninth Circuit got it wrong and chides Republicans for celebrating the victory:
State Republicans cheered a recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision striking down the city council election system in Tucson. In reality, however, the decision reflected the sort of judicial activism GOP orthodoxy decries.More from Robb:
Now, there is a great question in municipal governance about how city councils should be elected. Should they be elected by district, ensuring diverse geographical representation and greater attention to local concerns? Or should they be elected citywide, to ensure that parochial interests don’t overwhelm what’s best for the city as a whole?
Some cities try to create a blend, electing some city council members by district and some at-large. And some use a so-called hybrid system such as Tucson’s, with nomination by district and election at-large. That, theoretically, results in all members of the council being attentive to both local and citywide concerns.
Political scientists can debate all day about which is best in what circumstances. But the notion that a hybrid system is per se unconstitutional, and cities can’t even consider using it, would strike the framers of the 14th Amendment as a perversion of their handiwork.
Comments (3)
Showing 1-3 of 3
Previously in the Range
More by Jim Nintzel
-
Southern AZ COVID-19 AM Roundup for Tuesday, Oct. 20: More Than 1K New Cases Today; UA Increases Number of In-Person Classes; Total AZ Cases Close in on 233K; Free Testing Available
- Oct 20, 2020
-
Southern AZ COVID-19 AM Roundup for Monday, Oct. 19: Total AZ Cases Close in on 232K; Free Coronavirus Testing Available
- Oct 19, 2020
-
Southern AZ COVID-19 AM Roundup for Friday, Oct. 16: Total AZ Cases Top 229K; Fourth Avenue Winter Street Fair Canceled; More Restaurant Closures; Top News of the Week
- Oct 16, 2020
- More »
Popular Content
- October Horror Show: Photos Show Border Wall Built Across San Pedro River (The Range)
- Trump stops in Prescott, Tucson draw GOP crowds, Democratic jeers (The Range)
- A country club for racing enthusiasts, Inde Motorsports Ranch in Willcox ups its game (The Range)
- Tucson, other Arizona cities defend progress after slipping in clean energy ranking (The Range)
- Claytoonz: Flock Together (The Range)
